Big 12 Wrestling Expansion?

colbycheese

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2010
1,688
107
63
Kansas
twitter.com
Now that Nebraska is on its way out of the Big 12, the viability of such a small wrestling conference comes into question. Should the Big XII be looking to let other universities become affiliated with the Big 12 for wrestling purposes? If so, who would be good candidates? UNI perhaps?
 

cytech

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
6,480
242
63
Hiawatha, Iowa
Now that Nebraska is on its way out of the Big 12, the viability of such a small wrestling conference comes into question. Should the Big XII be looking to let other universities become affiliated with the Big 12 for wrestling purposes? If so, who would be good candidates? UNI perhaps?

what about boise state does the MWC have wrestling?
 

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,317
4,363
113
Arlington, TX
Now that Nebraska is on its way out of the Big 12, the viability of such a small wrestling conference comes into question. Should the Big XII be looking to let other universities become affiliated with the Big 12 for wrestling purposes? If so, who would be good candidates? UNI perhaps?

I would think it is something that should be investigated. UNI, NDSU, and SDSU come to mind. There are a number of smaller schools that are members of the Pac-10 for wrestling. Air Force is also currently an independent, and might be one for consideration.
 

Cyclone62

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2007
9,115
213
63
Oldpeopleville
Personally, I would like to pressure the Kansas schools to re-instate the sport first. Also, wrestling has been starting to gain a lot of traction down in Texas the past few years, so what is their take on getting into the ring?
 

isuno1fan

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2006
23,294
4,697
113
Clive, Iowa
There needs to be at least 6 teams wrestling.

5 was bad

4 is downright embarassing.

Go find 2 more somewhere as wrestling only schools.
 

RustyClone

Active Member
Dec 16, 2008
425
27
28
Hockenheim
Personally, I would like to pressure the Kansas schools to re-instate the sport first. Also, wrestling has been starting to gain a lot of traction down in Texas the past few years, so what is their take on getting into the ring?

I don't foresee KU ever having wrestling again but it would be a perfect fit at KSU. Quite a bit of talent in Kansas.
 

Cyclone62

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2007
9,115
213
63
Oldpeopleville
I don't foresee KU ever having wrestling again but it would be a perfect fit at KSU. Quite a bit of talent in Kansas.

I don't see KU joining in again unless KSU gets a lot of talent from the state. However, you get KSU on board, and possibly Texas (hell, they have the money to throw at it and get it started within a year), I can see KU looking into a re-start.
 

kucyclone

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2008
2,647
128
63
Seattle
What reason does KU have to start up wrestling? They have virtually no shot of ever winning anything. The sport would lose money, and lose even more money if they tried to actually be competitive. And most importantly, wrestling uses 10 scholarships, which means they would have to add 10 scholarships on the women's side, draining even more precious revenue.

Title IX has kind of forced a lot of tough decisions to be made in athletic departments. If I was AD, I would pretty much whittle my men's side down to football (85 scholarships), basketball (13 scholarships) and baseball (~12 scholarships), unless I had a big tradition in something else, such as ISU with wrestling. Then you just have to add women's sports to balance those men's scholarships, so you get basketball, softball, soccer, volleyball, etc., which all lose money for the athletic department. The more revenue losers you put on the men's side, the more you have to put on the women's side. It's the same reason why ISU isn't bringing back baseball.

It's been made quite clear over the past two weeks that to get a better place at the table of college athletics, one thing matters, and that is football. The more resources a school can devote to its football team, the better off that whole department is going to be down the line.
 

brett108

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2010
5,258
2,140
113
Tulsa, OK
What reason does KU have to start up wrestling? They have virtually no shot of ever winning anything. The sport would lose money, and lose even more money if they tried to actually be competitive. And most importantly, wrestling uses 10 scholarships, which means they would have to add 10 scholarships on the women's side, draining even more precious revenue.

Title IX has kind of forced a lot of tough decisions to be made in athletic departments. If I was AD, I would pretty much whittle my men's side down to football (85 scholarships), basketball (13 scholarships) and baseball (~12 scholarships), unless I had a big tradition in something else, such as ISU with wrestling. Then you just have to add women's sports to balance those men's scholarships, so you get basketball, softball, soccer, volleyball, etc., which all lose money for the athletic department. The more revenue losers you put on the men's side, the more you have to put on the women's side. It's the same reason why ISU isn't bringing back baseball.

It's been made quite clear over the past two weeks that to get a better place at the table of college athletics, one thing matters, and that is football. The more resources a school can devote to its football team, the better off that whole department is going to be down the line.

They wouldn't necessarilly have to add 10 scholies, but they would have to spend more on women's sports. Title IX, even though it has a participation clause, is not interpreted that way in the courts. The only interpretation that has been used is equal revenue. That means you need to spend as much on women's athletics as men's. That is why at ISU, you will find many more women on scholarship than men. For crying out loud, they sent a mass e-mail out to the students that women interested could try out for a new rowing team and get the opportunity to win full tuition scholarships when I was there. Bet that team was competitive.
 

mred

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2006
9,669
6,837
113
SE WI
bball.notnothing.net
Title IX, even though it has a participation clause, is not interpreted that way in the courts. The only interpretation that has been used is equal revenue. That means you need to spend as much on women's athletics as men's. That is why at ISU, you will find many more women on scholarship than men.

Not true.

Title IX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In 1979, the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare under Jimmy Carter's administration issued a policy interpretation for Title IX, including what has become known as the "three-prong test" of an institution's compliance.[14][15]

  1. Prong one - Providing athletic participation opportunities that are substantially proportionate to the student enrollment, OR
  2. Prong two - Demonstrate a continual expansion of athletic opportunities for the underrepresented sex, OR
  3. Prong three - Full and effective accommodation of the interest and ability of underrepresented sex.
A recipient of federal funds can demonstrate compliance with Title IX by meeting any one of the three prongs.[16]
Prong 1 basically means scholarship opportunities are proportional to the overall gender split.

Also:

Unequal aggregate expenditures for members of each sex or unequal expenditures for male and female teams if a recipient operates or sponsors separate teams will not constitute noncompliance with this section, but the Assistant Secretary [of Education for Civil Rights] may consider the failure to provide necessary funds for teams for one sex in assessing equality of opportunity for members of each sex.


I'll add up the number of scholarships available for men and women at ISU shortly...
 
Last edited:

mred

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2006
9,669
6,837
113
SE WI
bball.notnothing.net
ISU sports and scholarships available:

Men
Basketball 13
CC/T&F 12.6
Football 85
Golf 4.5
Wrestling 9.9

Total 125

Women
Basketball 15
CC/T&F 18
Golf 6
Gymnastics 12
Soccer 14
Softball 12
Swimming 14
Tennis 8
Volleyball 12

Total 111

Of the 236 total available scholarships, 47.2% are for women.

According to this, ISU is usually around 43.5% women. By my math, ISU could add as many as 15-20 men's scholarships and still be in Title IX compliance.
 

eclone

Member
Apr 10, 2006
91
2
8
Grimes
Boise State, Cal Poly, Cal St. Fullerton, and CaL St. Bakersfield all wrestle in the Pac-10 as one-sport associate members. I don't see why the Big 12 couldn't invite in a couple of schools for a similar agreement.

The "Western Wrestling Conference" is a wrestling only conference that UNI is in and has for its members: UNI, Air Force, ND St, No. Colorado, SDSU, Utah Valley, and Wyoming. Invite a couple of those programs and make the Big 12 a real sized conference. Although I don't know how badly those schools would want to wrestle ISU, OSU, OU every year and to qualify for nationals. I think there are some independent schools out there too, but I can't seem to find a listing off hand.
 

cyinne

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2009
2,086
623
113
O-town, Iowa
This is going to be a tricky subject.

There are rules in place (not sure if by NCAA or B12) that says you need at least 5 teams for a conference championship meet. With Nebraska leaving that only leaves the B12 with 4 teams which means no conference championship in the future.

Add more teams you say? That's not so simple.... There is a B12 bylaw that says that a school cannot join the league for certain sports. Which means those that want Boise State/Air Force/etc. to join for wrestling only it will not happen. The only way this happens is if the powers that be change the standards for the B12.
 
Last edited:

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,317
4,363
113
Arlington, TX
There are rules in place (not sure if by NCAA or B12) that says you need at least 5 teams for a conference championship meet. With Nebraska leaving that only leaves the B12 with 4 teams which means no conference championship in the future.

The Big 12 bylaws say that 6 teams are needed for a championship. Wrestling and and gymnastics were grandfathered in when the conference was formed. The wrestling championship will remain unless the conference votes to end it. There are no NCAA provisions that I am aware of which say that a championship cannot be held with only 4 teams. The Big 12 has been doing this for years with women's gymnastics.

See section 1.3.4.1 of
http://www.big12sports.com/fls/10410/pdfs/handbook/Bylaws.pdf?DB_OEM_ID=10410

Add more teams you say? That's not so simple.... There is a B12 bylaw that says that a school cannot join the league for certain sports.

Could you identify which section of the bylaws says this?

2009-10 Big 12 Conference Handbook - Big 12 Conference - Official Athletic Site
 

Three4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
4,254
2,881
113
West Des Moines
This is going to be a tricky subject.

There are rules in place (not sure if by NCAA or B12) that says you need at least 5 teams for a conference championship meet. With Nebraska leaving that only leaves the B12 with 4 teams which means no conference championship in the future.

Add more teams you say? That's not so simple.... There is a B12 bylaw that says that a school cannot join the league for certain sports. Which means those that want Boise State/Air Force/etc. to join for wrestling only it will not happen. The only way this happens is if the powers that be change the standards for the B12.

The current conference rules (12 team league) states 6 conference schools must offer a sport to offer a conference championship. However, wrestling and women's gymnastics, an men's swimming and diving were grandfathered in to allow conference sponsored championships with less than six teams. The problem becomes - Nebraska offers two of the sports (WR, GYM) that were grandfathered in, so do the championships continue to be sponsored by the B12, or do they become sports like rowing, and equestrian where the schools compete for the B12 champioship, the B12 provides a trophy and the use of the conference name, they just don't provide any support for the event. I wouldn't be surprised to wrestling continue as a sport sponsored by the conference. You have a 50/50 split North vs. South and to be honest, the Texas schools don't really care since they have never competed in the sport. The four remaining programs have all been solid and represented the B12 very well, so it would be in the best interest of the conference to keep it going. As for gymnastics, could be tough to justify a conference championship, but my guess is men's swimming will go on since it's aTm, Texas and Mizzou - and Texas dominates.

Conference Championship Sports Requirements.
In order for the Big 12 Conference to host a championship, that sport must include six institutions that satisfy “continuity of membership.” In order to meet the “continuity-of membership” requirement, a minimum of six institutions that sponsor the sport on a varsity intercollegiate basis must conduct conference competition together in Division I. Additionally, the NCAA must conduct a championship in the sport. (Note: The sports of wrestling, women’s gymnastics and men’s swimming & diving are “grandfathered” and retain championship status pending further review.)
 

trajanJ

Well-Known Member
Sep 11, 2008
1,463
242
63
If you don't already have wrestling you're not going to add it. Wrestling is a sport that is being eliminated not added. If you add it you would have to double whatever scholarships you add because of Title IV.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron