Why not throw LA in the poll too?
Randy Newman presents a good case.
[video=youtube;0b5LzCOc98E]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b5LzCOc98E[/video]
Why not throw LA in the poll too?
I've lived in LA and Chicago, visited New York 5 times for work and vactation. I like New York but I find the 2nd and 3rd largest cities much more livable to the average person.
Just my opinion but LA and Chicago are the big cities to live in and San Fran and NYC are the best to vacation...although a Chicago or LA vacation can still be good.
The thing is, whatever huge city you live in, you need to be comfortable with the idea of either really embracing your neighborhood or spending your life in cars, trains and buses. It can be amazing if you do and a real chore of you don't. The things LA has to offer combined with the climate make it pretty awesome, I thought I'd miss the concrete jungle feel of Chicago a lot more than I actually do. I go surfing on the beach or hiking in mountains almost every weekend and I live smack in the middle of LA.
The Central Park vs Millennium Park argument.....Griffith Park is 100x better than either. Absolutely stunning nature and views in the middle of our second largest city and comparatively nobody knows about it. Hiking up Griffith park is more of a life experience than the Empire State, Hancock or Willis Tower.
I currently live in Chicago and have lived in Kansas City, Des Moines/Ames, Omaha, and grew up in a smaller town in western Iowa. Chicago is hands down the best place I have lived and I have enjoyed it the most, from a city perspective. First time in a while I haven't been looking to where I will move next.
I find it funny how many people make a judgement on a city or area without ever actually living there. I often hear that the "big city elitist" judge the fly over states and have never been there where as small town people have never actually lived in a city like Chicago or New York and make a judgement on what it would be like to live there.
Btw-- Vising somewhere and actually making a life and living there are twe different things.
Disagree. Driving through Chicago suburbs is like driving down a 55mph 4 lane high way with strip malls on both sides.
I've never been to NYC and I've never had any desire to visit there, so it's difficult to make a comparison. I will say that I've been to most other large East Coast cities (Boston, Philly, DC) and while they're each fine in their own way, they're just too crammed together and congested for me. I'm thinking since NYC has such a small footprint, it would be similar. Chicago has a lot that I like, but it's so spread out and the traffic is nearly always terrible, it's difficult to say I "like" it much. But I guess I'd choose Chicago, but only by default because I don't have a basis of personal comparison.
Chicago, come for the food, stay because you got murdered.
I had to look this up...(Violent Crime rates and murder rates). Yes Chicago is higher than New York... but not even in the top ten. That was surprising. St. Louis on the other hand..
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/10/22/violent-crime-statistics-for-every-city-in-america/