I posted it an hour after it was releasedLol you had double digit posts on the depth chart before most knew it was posted.
that’s literally what he said.
Newell is average.
Kirk has always said he doesn’t care what the depth chart says.I posted it an hour after it was released
Brian is a liar but so is Kirk so not sure who's lying here
Newell is better than average. Your fellow Hawkeye fan just compared him to Austin Blythe
See belowKirk has always said he doesn’t care what the depth chart says.
lol that’s silly. Blythe was an All American.
Newell is good. Seems to be on track for a career similar to Austin Blythe. Linderbaum is a monster and could be the best center in college football.
Wirfs had been good so far this year but man he was bad last night
Yeah Wirfs was a big reason the Bears won honestlyOdd part was, that Mack got the sack and Wirfs kept going at Mack and Mack just hip tossed him like a rag doll.
That's ridiculous.See below
Newell was hurt last year. I wouldn't be surprised at him be All Conference like Blythe was as a junior but I'm not the one who said itThat's ridiculous.
Blythe (playing in the best OL conference):
2012 - First team Freshman All-American
2013 - HM All Big Ten
2014 - Second team All-Big10
2015 - Rimington finalist; 3rd team All American; 2nd Team All American
Newell (Playing in the worst OL conference):
2017 - Scout Team Player of the year
I would hope so. Big 12 OL accolades are about as meaningless as their TE accolades.Newell was hurt last year. I wouldn't be surprised at him be All Conference like Blythe was as a junior but I'm not the one who said it
Wirfs wasn’t even that bad. He wasn’t great but he only gave up 1 sack and he was a rookie going up against Khalil Mack.Yeah Wirfs was a big reason the Bears won honestly
The Big 12 offenses are much better than Big Ten offenses. Lol what are you talking about?I would hope so. Big 12 OL accolades are about as meaningless as their TE accolades.
He only had 29 yards on 10 carries. The big reason he scored points is because of his lone touchdown. He also did have 30 receiving yards. RB’s always put up big numbers in fanasty that’s why they always are taken first.Where did you hear that? He put up 20 against me in fantasy
Wirfs wasn’t even that bad. He wasn’t great but he only gave up 1 sack and he was a rookie going up against Khalil Mack.
Big 12 OL’s are much worse the Big 10 OL’s.The Big 12 offenses are much better than Big Ten offenses. Lol what are you talking about?
He was playing against one of the best rushers ever and he’s a rookie.He had two holding penalties and he gave up another sack to Mack that was negated due to an unrelated penalty
So you didn't hear he had a bad game you just looked at the box score?He only had 29 yards on 10 carries. The big reason he scored points is because of his lone touchdown. He also did have 30 receiving yards. RB’s always put up big numbers in fanasty that’s why they always are taken first.
Big 12 OL’s are much worse the Big 10 OL’s.
So if you use this as the case, Nate Stanley played great against ISU this past year (which he didn’t) when he had the play of the game in the QB sneak for the TD. Well maybe it wasn’t the play of the game, but it was still big.So you didn't hear he had a bad game you just looked at the box score?
He had arguably the play of the game to set up the game winner, had a rushing TD and was running behind an already poor OL that lost some guy named James Daniels who's actually been solid this year after a tough year last season
No. You made up that you heard Montgomery was "awful". I corrected you. Stanley is irrelevant in college and professional football not sure what he has to do with thisSo if you use this as the case, Nate Stanley played great against ISU this past year (which he didn’t) when he had the play of the game in the QB sneak for the TD. Well maybe it wasn’t the play of the game, but it was still big.