He’s had four months to watch film. If you think he’s just throwing **** at the wall, you’re not very bright.
Link to him saying he watched film on the Fumbler?
He’s had four months to watch film. If you think he’s just throwing **** at the wall, you’re not very bright.
Lol yeah that's it.
Serious question. You have two options, which one do you pick. Better college QB, worse NFL prospect or better NFL prospect and worse college QB?
Is he saying he's bad or is he saying Kempt is better?Lol. You just can’t accept the fact that Stanley is a potential first round prospect. With as much equity as you have put in here talking about how bad he is, I don’t blame you.
I’ll take the better college QB who just so happens to also be a better NFL prospect, i.e. Nate Stanley.
Link to him saying he watched film on the Fumbler?
Kempt was the better college QB last year. That's a fact, not an opinion. If you think Stanley will be better this upcoming year you're entitled to your opinion but you can't go back and pretend last season didn't happen
The NCAA and NIT tournaments have been around longer than the AP poll but you think the AP means more than banners that hang in arenas.Considering the Maxwell Award has been around for 40 years longer than the Davey O’Brien Award, and is awarded to the best all-around college football player, I don’t think there is any question that it is the much more prestigious award.
Derp.
If you read his evaluation of Stanley it would be rather obvious. Would be very strange for a scout to list a player’s strengths and weaknesses without watching any film on them. How exactly would that work? Maybe he just reads CycloneFanatic to develop his Iowa player evaluations.
The NCAA and NIT tournaments have been around longer than the AP poll but you think the AP means more than banners that hang in arenas.
It’s literally not a fact.
This is what he said on Mitch without watching film on him
Got it, so ISU was better in football last year.Ive been told from CyFan that the AP Poll is the best way to determine which team is better.
Exactly- there is nothing of substance there. “He’s a big guy that can run. Let’s see if he can improve his stats next year”
Lmao at thinking that is the same thing as his evaluation on Stanley. You are realllly reaching here.
So what metric should we be using to evaluate QB's? You don't seem to like any stats at that position
Apparently use weight.
Please explain to me how anything I said is inaccurate. If you think this is the same thing as McShay putting out a mock draft the day after the NFL Draft you are objectively an idiot.
Please explain to me how anything I said is inaccurate. If you think this is the same thing as McShay putting out a mock draft the day after the NFL Draft you are objectively an idiot.
Me: Stats say Kempt was better
Benji: I look at advanced stats when judging a player
Me: Advanced stats say Kempt was better
Benji: Well I don't like advanced stats in this instance
Are you McShay? Have you asked McShay how much Stanley film he has watched?
If you answer no to either of those, it is not a fact.