Chicago Bears bought Arlington Heights track only to build next to Soldier Field?

mustangcy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,905
1,011
113
Bloomfield
It’s a city of 3 million. Man up and visit. I’ve been here for years and shocker I’ve never been murdered.

It’s like me saying I’m never going to Principal Park because people have been shot on court ave. It’s a coward take

lol I'm literally taking my family downtown this summer and then to a Cubs game. I love Chicago, the point wasn't to never go, the argument is suburb vs downtown. Give me suburb all day long. But mainly give me the type of location of Arrowhead all day long.
 

cytor

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 20, 2011
7,926
12,665
113
Arlington heights would definitely be safer, possibly easier to get there, possible better parking, etc... I don't live in Chicago, so I will defer to the Bears fans as to what they are wanting. Sports is ever changing and it's all about the $. Teams will do what they do and the fans will have to adapt.
 

SleepyEyeCy

Member
Aug 5, 2023
115
-32
18
The problem with Soldier is that it only holds 61,500. The Bears could easily sell an additional 30,000 every game.
There was an article a few years ago explaining why stadiums were "downsizing" in capacity. Basically the most expensive seats to build are the cheapest priced seats to sell. The extra cost involved to put in just a few more rows which are the highest and furthest from the playing surface... That is when the trend switched to smaller capacity but with high dollar luxury boxes and suites. Obviously there are exemptions, like Jerry's World in Dallas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyCrazy

1SEIACLONE

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2024
2,389
2,222
113
63
Ames Iowa
There was an article a few years ago explaining why stadiums were "downsizing" in capacity. Basically the most expensive seats to build are the cheapest priced seats to sell. The extra cost involved to put in just a few more rows which are the highest and furthest from the playing surface... That is when the trend switched to smaller capacity but with high dollar luxury boxes and suites. Obviously there are exemptions, like Jerry's World in Dallas.
The reason that teams want to have more high dollar luxury boxes ands suites is that money is exempts from the league sharing laws. Teams currently have to share 34% of the regular ticket revenue, with the visiting team, but before got to keep all the funds from boxes and suites.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: SCNCY and NWICY

State2015

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 26, 2016
1,384
3,000
113
lol I'm literally taking my family downtown this summer and then to a Cubs game. I love Chicago, the point wasn't to never go, the argument is suburb vs downtown. Give me suburb all day long. But mainly give me the type of location of Arrowhead all day long.
Good to hear - we just have very different opinions on what we want out of a stadium. This past November for the KU game was my first time at arrowhead. Not a huge fan of walking thru 2miles of parking lot to get to the uber. If they had that baby within walking distance of the power & light that’s the best stadium in the country IMO
 

1SEIACLONE

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2024
2,389
2,222
113
63
Ames Iowa
Good to hear - we just have very different opinions on what we want out of a stadium. This past November for the KU game was my first time at arrowhead. Not a huge fan of walking thru 2miles of parking lot to get to the uber. If they had that baby within walking distance of the power & light that’s the best stadium in the country IMO
Stadium alike Arrowhead and JTS are set up to tail gate around your car, go into the stadium and then after the game, DRIVE home. Soldiers Field and others have little parking, which is great if you are Ubering to the game and then want to hit the bars afterwards. Two totally different experiences. Not saying one is better than the other, just different
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,673
31,951
113
Parts Unknown
Good to hear - we just have very different opinions on what we want out of a stadium. This past November for the KU game was my first time at arrowhead. Not a huge fan of walking thru 2miles of parking lot to get to the uber. If they had that baby within walking distance of the power & light that’s the best stadium in the country IMO

Hear me out.

What if a team moved to an area with ample parking and bars/restaurants close by?

What if the team owned the land, stadium, parking revenue, and was the landlord to the bars/restaurants/retail within walking distance?

Bear Down
 

WhatchaGonnaDo

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2011
7,493
2,532
113
My best friend and his brothers go to the opening game every year...stay in a condo downtown, very nice neighborhood. 2 years ago a guy got shot to death right out front of the place the night they were there. So...yeah I get what your saying on traffic, but I can tell you for a fact dudes be getting murdered down there.

Also, parking would be a MAJOR improvement. The ease to get to a game would go from insanely difficult to going to a Chiefs game.
People get murdered everywhere. Guess you better not leave the house at all if that's what you're worried about.

Prioritizing cars is just so American, so I guess the shoe fits.

Why not stay in a hotel in the safety of the burbs and take the train downtown? Oh right, the poors are on the train and we don't want to have to see them.
 

WhatchaGonnaDo

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2011
7,493
2,532
113
PuskfW7rndNJ2PzgiZT1vJBMe0Lb65h1WJhv6lbQvHM.jpg

American football vs European soccer. Same capacity stadium. Different priorities.

We must cater to the rural folk afraid of cities and give them a car-dependent safe haven!
 

CyJeans

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
2,357
2,864
113
Beaverdale, IA
It’s 100% a nightmare getting out of soldier. There’s a lot of room for improvements for sure. But it will be even more of a nightmare getting out of AH as everyone will be driving, rather than folks walking or taking the train at soldier.

I understand the appeal to some for a suburb stadium but I can’t stop thinking about how boring it’ll be for visitors, especially at big events
There is a Metra stop at the site of the stadium today plus it will be much easier to extend the blue line out to the site vs re routing the red to be closer to the current site. The location is also located by 90/290 and is very close to O'hare. It will be easier to get to in AH arguably considering how much of a pain in the ass it is today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigJCy

BMWallace

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Sep 11, 2011
1,527
2,907
113
Chicago, IL
There is a Metra stop at the site of the stadium today plus it will be much easier to extend the blue line out to the site vs re routing the red to be closer to the current site. The location is also located by 90/290 and is very close to O'hare. It will be easier to get to in AH arguably considering how much of a pain in the ass it is today.
I do not see them extending the blue line at all. To me it would be easier to add a green line spur that follows the Stevenson over to McCormick Place and up to the museum campus. Plus that would actually have reason to operate year round. A blue line extension to AH doesn't have that same benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: State2015

State2015

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 26, 2016
1,384
3,000
113
There is a Metra stop at the site of the stadium today plus it will be much easier to extend the blue line out to the site vs re routing the red to be closer to the current site. The location is also located by 90/290 and is very close to O'hare. It will be easier to get to in AH arguably considering how much of a pain in the ass it is today.
Just wait for the incompetence of metra to have 1 train running every 45mins on game days. At least soldier is within walking distance to the red line which runs every 5min usually. Zero chance they’ll extend the blue line

If they expand metra service I agree it would be a good middle ground tho
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: CyJeans

State2015

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 26, 2016
1,384
3,000
113
PuskfW7rndNJ2PzgiZT1vJBMe0Lb65h1WJhv6lbQvHM.jpg

American football vs European soccer. Same capacity stadium. Different priorities.

We must cater to the rural folk afraid of cities and give them a car-dependent safe haven!
Adding to this - what are the most popular baseball stadiums? Wrigley and Fenway. What do those have in common? Both built into a neighborhood with plenty of fun stuff to do nearby. If you NEED to drive you can park within a 15-20min walk

Ever wonder why no one is itching to go see a royals, angels, or rays game? Look up those stadiums (RIP Tropicana tho)
 

CyJeans

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
2,357
2,864
113
Beaverdale, IA
The point being missed in all of this is that there was not a realistic plan forward at the Soldier field site or the Michael Reese site. The Soldier field site is owned by the park district not the bears, and I believe was going to cost around $5 billion for the stadium, to reroute the red line, move lake shore underground, and I think it included a Metra stop. The state said there is no funding available for stadiums for the foreseeable future. So, they would pay $5 billion to essentially not own any of it. The Michael Reese site had a lot of the same issues except they would own the land I believe. In Arlington Heights, they already own the land, they will own everything, and the infrastructure is already in a better spot with a Metra line bordering the property. Regardless of what you feel about billionaires and taxpayers funding their vanity projects, the bears are one of the poorest ownerships in the league, their wealth is the Bears. AH makes more sense for them dollars and cents wise period.

I get the nostalgia behind Soldier Field, and it is a beautiful view, but those two things don't generate revenue in the same way as the new AH site would.
 

CyJeans

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
2,357
2,864
113
Beaverdale, IA
Just wait for the incompetence of metra to have 1 train running every 45mins on game days. At least soldier is within walking distance to the red line which runs every 5min usually. Zero chance they’ll extend the blue line

If they expand metra service I agree it would be a good middle ground tho
Yeah I grew up by a Metra line, on a normal work day they run quite frequently and have many express lines, I find it very unlikely they would do what you suggest.

The blue line extension has been proposed for a long time, there just hasn't been a big enough need to until this point. If they build in Arlington Heights, that is as good of reason as any. The red line is not close to soldier, I have done that walk many times before, it is brutal in the winter. Rerouting it in the heart of downtown to the stadium would be way more difficult to do vs AH considering the blue line already hugs 90 for the majority of the way.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron