I think he would have made it more obvious in the thread that he knew something, if that was the case.He also might have gotten some clues and solved them.
Vote Vikes.
I think he would have made it more obvious in the thread that he knew something, if that was the case.He also might have gotten some clues and solved them.
Having re-read this thread I now realize that my vote change happened after the day was already over.Good try.
I definitely didn't solve the clue. During the past few games I've looked at the bad guys in the writeup and have come up with acrostics for my Day 1 vote. Stupid luck that oldman was actually mafia.I think he would have made it more obvious in the thread that he knew something, if that was the case.
Vote Vikes.
Stupid luck? Not good luck? Must be mafia...I definitely didn't solve the clue. During the past few games I've looked at the bad guys in the writeup and have come up with acrostics for my Day 1 vote. Stupid luck that oldman was actually mafia.
i fell asleep and forgot to. I'll get on that.Hey @Cy$ can you post the results of your game yesterday?
Sorry. That should be changed now.Hey @bsaltyman, can you not use black coloring on the player list on the first page? It's next to impossible to see in dark mode. Thanks!
I look forward to your paranoia of me going 4/4 on known and assumed innos.
results. My analysis of this next.
Can you blame me? I mean, I came under fire because I thought someone had a creative way of getting a private response without a PM!KCclone played the game in an interesting way, but she also was reluctant to play before she knew what the game even was so I think she is clear as of right now.
Lol ok. I stand by that reluctance to play that game. I’m not gonna participate in something that I don’t know the consequences of. I’ll continue to play that way if cash throws out more stuff like that too. There’s no way that late rescind of cash was gonna look good either way. By the time I got back on it was over. I don’t rescind, I look guilty. I do rescind and move to Oldman, I look guilty.I am skeptical of a couple people right now. PSYclone claimed to have solved the anagram puzzle saying Cleaver was inno, yet was reluctant to share said info.
The other side is him outing CTown, but I would think that a mafia member would keep that to themselves rather than sharing, so that takes him off my path for a while. (Although he thought there might be 2 mafias and outing the other one would be beneficial to his as well)
KCclone played the game in an interesting way, but she also was reluctant to play before she knew what the game even was so I think she is clear as of right now.
JM4CY was the 3rd vote for CY$ in the morning, almost starting a runaway. He was also very reluctant to play the game and only played after I said not playing would make him seem like mafia. Also had a late rescind off CY$ onto oldman after the runaway was over.
Vote JM4CY for right now. my mind is willing to be changed if he has a good case.
Gotta love the universal town read. Don't even need any scum reading to appear innocent it seems.
results. My analysis of this next.
You do realize one of the anagrams solved to "Cleaver is reg inno", right?Gotta love the universal town read. Don't even need any scum reading to appear innocent it seems.
Yes I'm aware. Going along with the chart and making a joke. Although I kinda wish I wasn't known so early. Adds pressure of knowing people are going to follow my leads and I haven't been all that great at finding mafia so far.You do realize one of the anagrams solved to "Cleaver is reg inno", right?