ISU offense must be truly inept to only score 17 pts if that were true.
Without the phantom holding we score 20 or 24
ISU offense must be truly inept to only score 17 pts if that were true.
They were better at being lucky and having biased refs. I will admit their Special Teams were better. But our offense and defense are both significantly better than Iowa's.Iowa State may have looked like the better team in some facets of the game, but where it counted (turnovers, mistakes) we were not. In close games like that, games will be decided on the little things and Iowa was better at the little things.
We were not significantly better than Iowa. Had we been, we would've won the game and won the game by more than one point. Iowa was not significantly better than us either, however they were better enough to beat us. We also need to stop dwelling on the holding call. Yes it was not the best call, but it does not guarantee victory had it not been called. We had an opportunity to still win the game and did not because we made a ginormous mistake.They were better at being lucky and having biased refs. I will admit their Special Teams were better. But our offense and defense are both significantly better than Iowa's.
I refuse to give a team credit that was just flat lucky and had officiating on it's side.We were not significantly better than Iowa. Had we been, we would've won the game and won the game by more than one point. Iowa was not significantly better than us either, however they were better enough to beat us. We also need to stop dwelling on the holding call. Yes it was not the best call, but it does not guarantee victory had it not been called. We had an opportunity to still win the game and did not because we made a ginormous mistake.
Move on from this game.. it's over. Give Iowa credit because they deserve it. They came into Jack Trice on a weird day and found a way to win.
I agree, Iowa had a huge advantage getting that extra game in. Nothing substitutes for live action. Even with that advantage, if the refs call 25% of Iowa’s holds, we win by 10+ points.
So it goes
1. Ojemudia
2. Hankins
3. Moss
4. Brents
5. That Johnson kid that got torched?
You must be on drugs. Go sleep it off little brother.
I would flip Hankins and Brents and if Brents was healthy all camp, I would maybe even have Brents #2.
Lord people are being testy
Iowa lost Hankins during the week 2 game. Who knows if ISU suffers any injuries in week 2 if they had to play a game.
I haven't seen that guy around for a long time. Why are people on here so obsessed with him? It's weird.1976 isn't happy after predicting another ISU blowout win in the CyHawk game.
1976 isn't happy after predicting another ISU blowout win in the CyHawk game.
You should be flattered to be compared to the legend that is @1976I haven't seen that guy around for a long time. Why are people on here so obsessed with him? It's weird.
Guy doesn't sound very smart to me, so I'm not flattered.You should be flattered to be compared to the legend that is @1976
Might have lost your Punter and had to pick up somebody from the intramural soccer team. Oh wait. That might have helped.What a huge loss lol
There are lots of people where I work, and on this board that feel exactly the same way I do. But some of you want to look cool to Iowa fans or something and give them credit they don't deserve. It's weird. Do you really think they are better than us? If you know anything about football, you can't possibly think that.For the love of god. I think you are a hawk sock puppet.
You have lost 5 times in a row. You need to get over the more yardage crap.There are lots of people where I work, and on this board that feel exactly the same way I do. But some of you want to look cool to Iowa fans or something and give them credit they don't deserve. It's weird. Do you really think they are better than us? If you know anything about football, you can't possibly think that.
Might have lost your Punter and had to pick up somebody from the intramural soccer team. Oh wait. That might have helped.