So the first 50% of our first 10 throws were for 10+ yards and you're saying we didn't attack down the field? I remember almost every one of those throws and they were not swing passes by any means. We were finding holes in the middle of the zone coverage and picking up chunks of yardage. We took our shots down the field as well. To start the second half we threw a 73 yard TD and then an 18 yard pass to Pettway that was also not a dump off.
YEP.
Lol it's pretty funny the "best D-lineman in the nation" couldn't touch Brock Purdy with Iowa State's bad o-line in front of him.
I know I'm just messing around. We schemed essentially perfectly and Purdy did a great job of knowing how much time he had.
Easy now. I'd like to think he is one of the best defensive lineman in the nation and we just did a good job with him.
The elephant in the room appears to be the Clones inability to put points on the board. They scored 17 pts. That's 30 pts in regulation in the 1st 2 games. Clones have broken 30 once in their last 8 games. Should be very concerning. Hawks clearly have some redzone issues as well but clearly are more efficient at putting points on the board.
We've moved the ball well the last two weeks we've just shot ourselves in the foot in critical situations that diminished our scoring chances.
Is that the guy that said only two Iowa players would be playing on ISU's defense?
