Pollard said what would be basically true about any conference. Remove the two tent poles, and the conference becomes a lesser conference. Washington States AD basically said his school is getting the support as if it was already in a lesser conference. Big difference.
I've always felt the super conference idea is extremely short-sighted from a financial standpoint. With actual viewers starting to matter more, you need more high quality matchups. I think it helps the weaker teams more than the strong teams (could be wrong though...).
Didn't Saban and Fisher both say recently that college football needed to make scheduling more equitable. I think Saban went as far as saying the SEC should be playing 10 conference games with the other two vs P5 schools. If more coaches believe that, I think big changes are in store for college football at the next round of negotiations.
I can't remember who published it or who did the analysis but a couple years back some finance guru explained how breaking the country up into regional pods would optimize viewership and overall revenue. IMO this idea seemed to make the most sense.
Fundamental change seldom happens without a crisis. It will take a collapse of TV revenues for any sensible change to occur with realignment, perhaps yielding what your analysis suggests.I can't remember who published it or who did the analysis but a couple years back some finance guru explained how breaking the country up into regional pods would optimize viewership and overall revenue. IMO this idea seemed to make the most sense.
Thats how you can be 100% sure it will never happen.
Fundamental change seldom happens without a crisis. It will take a collapse of TV revenues for any sensible change to occur with realignment, perhaps yielding what your analysis suggests.
Fundamental change seldom happens without a crisis. It will take a collapse of TV revenues for any sensible change to occur with realignment, perhaps yielding what your analysis suggests.