Gonzaga has had tons of great multi year players in their program for a long time. Closest they have come to winning the championship is because they had Suggs and Chet Holmgren to go with the solid foundation.
Obviously you need good 4 year players to have a good program, but mixing in NBA lottery talent with your roster is a fun "problem" to have. Oh, and we do have a good 4 year player in this class. I'll take him with Omaha.
![]()
Milan Momcilovic, Iowa State Cyclones, Power Forward
Milan Momcilovic is a 6-8, 205-pound Power Forward from Pewaukee, WI.247sports.com
Gonzaga has had tons of great multi year players in their program for a long time. Closest they have come to winning the championship is because they had Suggs and Chet Holmgren to go with the solid foundation.
Just a reminder, Jordan McCabe beat out Tyler Herro and Tyrese Haliburton for Wisconsins Mr Basketball in 2018.I see Sandfort won Mr. Basketball. Is that a surprise over Biliew?
Saying Pryce is a very good high school basketball player who put up better stats which determines Mr. BB would be a rational argument and make sense. Saying Pryce is a better basketball player than Omaha is flat out wrong lol. I'm not the one who brought the irrationality to the argumentI’m sorry, I forgot where I was. I was thinking of a rational discussion. Forgot you guys can’t do that. See ya.
I'd take Pryce because who knows what he could mold into at a different school but at Iowa, he's going to end up shuffling around the 3 pt line throwing up as many threes as possible while not playing a lick of defense.I may be in the minority, but I wouldn't want Sandfort. I wouldn't want the older one either.
No one questions Omaha has the far better potential In the long term (both college and pro), hence his 5 star rating. Better player in HS isn’t based on potential. In HS it’s all about the stats and winning In determining Mr. BB. Pryce has the edge in stats in virtually every category including rebounding and they won 2 of 3 in head to head. So to blame his winning on “voters who are old Iowa fans” Is like blaming officials for every loss (and yes we fans all do that). But, give Pryce his credit — he deserved to win. Additionally, Pryce will most likely be at Iowa for 4 years, Omaha a max of 2. So who is likely to have the better college career?
Which one is more likely to play in a Sweet 16?No one questions Omaha has the far better potential In the long term (both college and pro), hence his 5 star rating. Better player in HS isn’t based on potential. In HS it’s all about the stats and winning In determining Mr. BB. Pryce has the edge in stats in virtually every category including rebounding and they won 2 of 3 in head to head. So to blame his winning on “voters who are old Iowa fans” Is like blaming officials for every loss (and yes we fans all do that). But, give Pryce his credit — he deserved to win. Additionally, Pryce will most likely be at Iowa for 4 years, Omaha a max of 2. So who is likely to have the better college career?
Show me the stats that prove that because you are wrong.Which one is more likely to play in a Sweet 16?
Where did I say Pryce was a better player?Saying Pryce is a very good high school basketball player who put up better stats which determines Mr. BB would be a rational argument and make sense. Saying Pryce is a better basketball player than Omaha is flat out wrong lol. I'm not the one who brought the irrationality to the argument
We've heard a lot of funny basketball recruiting arguments over the years from Iowa fans. Not wanting to land 5* prospects is one of the weirder ones.
Plus if Pryce didn't get it, then the McAssrey bros would be counseling him on how to be a **** and to tweet jealously about the guy who did.No one questions Omaha has the far better potential In the long term (both college and pro), hence his 5 star rating. Better player in HS isn’t based on potential. In HS it’s all about the stats and winning In determining Mr. BB. Pryce has the edge in stats in virtually every category including rebounding and they won 2 of 3 in head to head. So to blame his winning on “voters who are old Iowa fans” Is like blaming officials for every loss (and yes we fans all do that). But, give Pryce his credit — he deserved to win. Additionally, Pryce will most likely be at Iowa for 4 years, Omaha a max of 2. So who is likely to have the better college career?
Where is Pryce transferring to so he can play in a Sweet 16, and I mean NCAA Sweet 16.Show me the stats that prove that because you are wrong.
If length of stay is what defines a better college career, then Jordan Bohannon is the greatest college basketball player of all time.No one questions Omaha has the far better potential In the long term (both college and pro), hence his 5 star rating. Better player in HS isn’t based on potential. In HS it’s all about the stats and winning In determining Mr. BB. Pryce has the edge in stats in virtually every category including rebounding and they won 2 of 3 in head to head. So to blame his winning on “voters who are old Iowa fans” Is like blaming officials for every loss (and yes we fans all do that). But, give Pryce his credit — he deserved to win. Additionally, Pryce will most likely be at Iowa for 4 years, Omaha a max of 2. So who is likely to have the better college career?
"Better player in HS isn’t based on potential." is what you said right after saying Omaha has more potential (obviously).Where did I say Pryce was a better player?