The reason to push it back is to simply give more time to see how colleges are able to handle things before introducing the big variable of traveling football teams.
Big Ten and Pac 12 didn't want to wait any longer for what they felt was inevitable.
Big XII, SEC, and ACC are much more on the "lets give it as much time as we can to see if things somehow improve or don't get any worse when college is open" track. They realize the chances of actually playing are still less than 50/50, but they will also take a lot less slack if they let it go to the last minute and show they're trying everything they can to make it work.
Much of the flack the Big Ten and Pac 12 are taking, in my opinion, is more about the timing of the decision and not at least giving the appearance of holding out hope.
There is a lot of politics involved now and if this was a week ago, Big XII would have sided with the Big Ten/Pac 12 - regardless of one's opinions on if that would have been the right thing to do. I would say they are less adamant that there will be games than people are inferring from the latest activities.
Big Ten and Pac 12 didn't want to wait any longer for what they felt was inevitable.
Big XII, SEC, and ACC are much more on the "lets give it as much time as we can to see if things somehow improve or don't get any worse when college is open" track. They realize the chances of actually playing are still less than 50/50, but they will also take a lot less slack if they let it go to the last minute and show they're trying everything they can to make it work.
Much of the flack the Big Ten and Pac 12 are taking, in my opinion, is more about the timing of the decision and not at least giving the appearance of holding out hope.
There is a lot of politics involved now and if this was a week ago, Big XII would have sided with the Big Ten/Pac 12 - regardless of one's opinions on if that would have been the right thing to do. I would say they are less adamant that there will be games than people are inferring from the latest activities.