So I decided it would be a good idea to run to HyVee to get my weekend shopping done now before the weekend
Narrator: It was not a good idea
Narrator: It was not a good idea
Actually, I believe Dr. Fauci said that in order to be completely sure you're good to leave isolation if you have tested positive, you should test negative two times. Test negative once, wait a week, and then test negative again.So if they test me today and I'm negative, I'm in the clear? Good to know.
Wait what did our governor say?Sounds like some of our company leadership just had a call that essentially boiled down to " Despite what the governor has said we still have stuff that needs to get done and cannot be done from home so those people are still expected to be here working"
Until we test everyone we don't know who can pass it on to people. See South Korea.
So if they test me today and I'm negative, I'm in the clear? Good to know.
By testing everyone, you mean 1%. They've tested 1% of their population. 1%
And yet they are doing better than we are.
I went for a walk today maintaining social distancing. Lots more cars out.
That would be ideal, but we are nowhere near being able to do that. Eventually we'll get to the point where a majority of the population will have resistance/immunity, mitigating the chance of our medical infrastructure being overrun. This will probably happen before the ideal situation we're talking about occurs.Would it be a good thing if we could have a way to do rounds of tests like bi weekly to monitor it?
Let's say we test everyone. Then the people with it with no symptoms will stay away from people and it is less likely they'll pass it on to you.
I realize we are too far gone for mass testing to work as effectively. But make no doubt, we are worse off because people didn't get tested and aren't getting tested.
It makes much more sense to do it on a state by state basis.Yeah Trump shot this down again that he'd be implementing a country wide lockdown. I think it'd have to get worse across the entire nation for that to happen. More states my follow along with what others are doing and cutting down the employees in offices, but as far as an actual lockdown I doubt we'd end up doing that.
Agreed! As someone who works in a school, we've had staff and students with pneumonia and other non-diagnosed respiratory illnesses over the past couple of months. In the staff cases, those individuals have shared that test results for influenza and strep were negative.
There have been a couple interesting articles coming out over the past couple of days regarding antibody testing. Here's a link to one: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/...ow-widespread-coronavirus-covid-19-really-is/
It would be interesting to know if any antibody testing (widespread or localized) has been suggested in Iowa, and if so, that could give us a better indication of how prevalent this new strain might be, imo...
Agree. If the virus has truly been here for months then 1 of 2 things has to be true:I've been seeing a lot of this and I don't quite understand the logic.
There are probably hundreds (maybe thousands) of regularly spread viruses every winter that can cause symptoms without testing positively for flu or strep. It is incredibly common.
Given what we have watched unfold over the last couple months, how and where the disease has spread, how health systems worldwide can be overrun in less than two weeks, the culturally draconian efforts to contain the US population, etc, what makes people think the COVID-19 they are telling themselves they already "had" behaved differently when everyone was just walking about like everything was fine?
So I decided it would be a good idea to run to HyVee to get my weekend shopping done now before the weekend
Narrator: It was not a good idea
The wife went to the store to grab a few things yesterday. She came home with enough food to feed an army vowing not to set foot in the store again until this thing passes.
Ive got enough food to get through the next two weeks; I feel like the hysteria will continue until the end of March.
IL gov also just ordered a shelter in place, so if you think people are panicked now...
Interesting. I honestly don't think the "shelter-in-place" order is much beyond what we have going on now in Iowa.
I think so too. And I am not trying to be insensitive about it or be a big conspiracy guy about it, but if it was here a while ago, and as a whole no one noticed it, what are we trying to gain or accomplish with our current shutdown measures?
Interesting. I honestly don't think the "shelter-in-place" order is much beyond what we have going on now in Iowa.