Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,167
27,158
113
So if they test me today and I'm negative, I'm in the clear? Good to know.
Actually, I believe Dr. Fauci said that in order to be completely sure you're good to leave isolation if you have tested positive, you should test negative two times. Test negative once, wait a week, and then test negative again.
 

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,167
27,158
113
Sounds like some of our company leadership just had a call that essentially boiled down to " Despite what the governor has said we still have stuff that needs to get done and cannot be done from home so those people are still expected to be here working"
Wait what did our governor say?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ruflosn

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,283
39,272
113
So if they test me today and I'm negative, I'm in the clear? Good to know.

Let's say we test everyone. Then the people with it with no symptoms will stay away from people and it is less likely they'll pass it on to you.

I realize we are too far gone for mass testing to work as effectively. But make no doubt, we are worse off because people didn't get tested and aren't getting tested.
 

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,283
39,272
113
I went for a walk today maintaining social distancing. Lots more cars out.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JM4CY

nfrine

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2006
9,820
11,988
113
Nearby
I went for a walk today maintaining social distancing. Lots more cars out.
582_T07.750x500.jpg
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,299
14,990
113
Would it be a good thing if we could have a way to do rounds of tests like bi weekly to monitor it?
That would be ideal, but we are nowhere near being able to do that. Eventually we'll get to the point where a majority of the population will have resistance/immunity, mitigating the chance of our medical infrastructure being overrun. This will probably happen before the ideal situation we're talking about occurs.
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,299
14,990
113
Let's say we test everyone. Then the people with it with no symptoms will stay away from people and it is less likely they'll pass it on to you.

I realize we are too far gone for mass testing to work as effectively. But make no doubt, we are worse off because people didn't get tested and aren't getting tested.

There's no point in testing asymptomatics right now. There's just not. I wish I could explain it better.
 

isutrevman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2007
7,372
9,952
113
38
Ames, IA
Yeah Trump shot this down again that he'd be implementing a country wide lockdown. I think it'd have to get worse across the entire nation for that to happen. More states my follow along with what others are doing and cutting down the employees in offices, but as far as an actual lockdown I doubt we'd end up doing that.
It makes much more sense to do it on a state by state basis.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Agreed! As someone who works in a school, we've had staff and students with pneumonia and other non-diagnosed respiratory illnesses over the past couple of months. In the staff cases, those individuals have shared that test results for influenza and strep were negative.

There have been a couple interesting articles coming out over the past couple of days regarding antibody testing. Here's a link to one: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/...ow-widespread-coronavirus-covid-19-really-is/

It would be interesting to know if any antibody testing (widespread or localized) has been suggested in Iowa, and if so, that could give us a better indication of how prevalent this new strain might be, imo...

I've been seeing a lot of this and I don't quite understand the logic.

There are probably hundreds (maybe thousands) of regularly spread viruses every winter that can cause symptoms without testing positively for flu or strep. It is incredibly common.

Given what we have watched unfold over the last couple months, how and where the disease has spread, how health systems worldwide can be overrun in less than two weeks, the culturally draconian efforts to contain the US population, etc, what makes people think the COVID-19 they are telling themselves they already "had" behaved differently when everyone was just walking about like everything was fine?
 

isutrevman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2007
7,372
9,952
113
38
Ames, IA
I've been seeing a lot of this and I don't quite understand the logic.

There are probably hundreds (maybe thousands) of regularly spread viruses every winter that can cause symptoms without testing positively for flu or strep. It is incredibly common.

Given what we have watched unfold over the last couple months, how and where the disease has spread, how health systems worldwide can be overrun in less than two weeks, the culturally draconian efforts to contain the US population, etc, what makes people think the COVID-19 they are telling themselves they already "had" behaved differently when everyone was just walking about like everything was fine?
Agree. If the virus has truly been here for months then 1 of 2 things has to be true:

1. Our healthcare system would already be overrun and we'd already have hundreds to thousands of deaths in Iowa alone.

2. Since #1 has not happened, then the virus is not very deadly at all.

I'm inclined to believe and flu-like symptoms people have in January, February or early March were something else, definitely not COVID-19.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,455
25,846
113
So I decided it would be a good idea to run to HyVee to get my weekend shopping done now before the weekend

Narrator: It was not a good idea

The wife went to the store to grab a few things yesterday. She came home with enough food to feed an army vowing not to set foot in the store again until this thing passes.
 
  • Winner
  • Funny
Reactions: MeanDean and cmjh10

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,193
65,965
113
Colorado
The wife went to the store to grab a few things yesterday. She came home with enough food to feed an army vowing not to set foot in the store again until this thing passes.

Ive got enough food to get through the next two weeks; I feel like the hysteria will continue until the end of March.

IL gov also just ordered a shelter in place, so if you think people are panicked now...
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Interesting. I honestly don't think the "shelter-in-place" order is much beyond what we have going on now in Iowa.

I agree but it gives the BuT mUH tESt KIts crowd something fresh to chew on, and makes government officials appear to be doing something when there is little they can do from a practical standpoint.
 

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
9,856
9,593
113
Rural U.S.A.
I think so too. And I am not trying to be insensitive about it or be a big conspiracy guy about it, but if it was here a while ago, and as a whole no one noticed it, what are we trying to gain or accomplish with our current shutdown measures?

Avoiding what is happening in Italy. That part hasn't come yet. Look for it in the next week or so. Hope it doesn't happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron