Well then you're just arguing syntax, which is irrelevant. The violation states that the guardian made an agreement WITH an agent.
From the ncaa news report: "According to the facts provided for purpose of the reinstatement request, De Sousa's guardian received payment of $2,500 from an agent and booster of the school. He agreed to accept additional payment of $20,000 from the same individual and an Adidas emplyee for securing De Sousa's enrollment at Kansas."
Sentence one explicitely states that the information provided on the reinstatement request (that the ncaa forced Kansas to include and claimed was "hypothetical only") was used as the determiner of the violation. Kansas was REQUIRED to name Gassnola an agent and booster for the reinstatement request to be considered and then they busted them for making an agreement with an agent and booster. It's beyond shady and absurd.
Sentence two is supported by zero evidence except for Gassnola's testimony. None.
No, I am not. It is what allows the NCAA to punish DeSousa for the guardian's actions. I don't why you can't understand that.
Yes, the NCAA is shady, but what's new? Until the universities get together and form something different, it is what they have to deal with. They can continue to screw kids year after year but that won't change without the universities doing something. But they won't do anything because they like the set up because they get the monetary benefits. So I don't see the NCAA going away until they really piss off some big players.