Damn, forgot about both Victor Alexander and Abdul Aziz on my list. Time to edit...
While you have the eraser out, Bobby Stevens?!?!
Damn, forgot about both Victor Alexander and Abdul Aziz on my list. Time to edit...
Statistically there are better candidates.
That's not me. I have Barry Stevens. Northwoodscy has Bobby Stevens, whoever that is.While you have the eraser out, Bobby Stevens?!?!
What stats are you going off of?
He was the most dominant player for the most dominant team in ISU history.
Guy shot over 46% for two teams that were some of the lousiest in ISU history, followed it up with one of the most efficient seasons in our history with a PER of 121.2.
Here's a stat: 2000 was the only elite eight team in Iowa State history.
You can take your 4-year guys' stats and convolude the argument. Fact is, people that know basketball understand that Fizer is our greatest, with Tinsley and Grayer coming in a close second.
No Hercle = Hanging chad
Some of Hornacek's numbersYou lose points in my book by turning pro early. Sure they are good for mostly for themselves which eliminates Fizer & Royce White, what dude was her for 1 season.
With history on his side. Hoiberg has to be the man. Especially when you add his coaching, no single person has been involved in more success.
I was here for Grayer, the end of Hornacek, Victor was a stud. Hoiberg is my guy though.
Horny had the best pro career but he was only a walk on... not sure how many games/points he has his first several seasons. Fred was the ball boy when i was here and we knew he could ball back in 7th grade.
So its Fred but damn was Tinsley fun to watch & win with. Remember dude never lost a game at Hilton, nobody else can say it but he only played 2 years.... So its Fred
Zaid Abdul-Aziz Career:
22.3 PPG (#1 on ISU All-Time list)
13.7 RPG (#1 on ISU All-Time list)
54 career Double-Doubles (#1 on ISU All-Time list)
Marcus Fizer Career:
18.9 PPG
7.4 RPG
You wanna talk about being on lousy teams? Anything pre 1980s is the definition of lousy ISU basketball.
Zaid Abdul-Aziz was not a 4 year player, he was a 3 year player just like Fizer, as freshmen couldn't play.
Abdul-Aziz:
-One of two ISU players to earn First Team All-Conference honors three times (the other was Jeff Grayer)
-All-American 1968
-1968 Big 8 Player of the year
-1968 NBA Draft: #5 pick overall
-10 year NBA career
I'm absolutely NOT saying Marcus Fizer wasn't dominate, hell look at my original post. But to think that averaging a double-double over the course of your whole CAREER isn't dominate, I don't know what is. 54 double-doubles! Melvin Ejim only got 32 in 4 years while playing many more games in a season. I understand basketball, but it doesn't take a basketball wiz to see who was the more dominate player between those two.
http://www.cyclones.com/pdf9/2534266.pdf?SPID=4252&DB_LANG=C&DB_OEM_ID=10700
http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=10700&ATCLID=801789
This is dumb. If you gave both Fizer and Zaid a rating out of ten and their opponents a rating out of ten it would all equate. If Fizer scores a 9/10 and his competition is a 7/10 and Zaid was a 7/10 and his opponents were 5/10... it's all equal. This isn't Fizer going back and playing with late 1960s players or Zaid time traveling and playing with early 2000s players. You are trying to compare apples and oranges. They were both dominate for their time. Are you now going to try and tell me Babe Ruth isn't one of the greatest power hitters of all-time because he didn't face pitchers throwing 98 mph? Please...Zaid played against different competition. Different time, different game, different officiating, and especially different *ahem non-existent ahem* weight-lifting regimens. I tend to severely discount accomplishments of far yesteryear because the game was being dominated by men taking advantage of playing against frail pasties night in and night out.
Additionally, rebounding numbers are inflated by a by-gone era. See: http://www.encyclonepedia.com/?p=3344#more-3344
Old codgers, feel free to lose your $hit at that notion, but it's true.
Fizer was an undersized (6'7" maybe) power forward who physically imposed his will against taller, more physically-able players. I am positive the talent Zaid played against paled in comparison to Fizer's competition.
This is dumb. If you gave both Fizer and Zaid a rating out of ten and their opponents a rating out of ten it would all equate. If Fizer scores a 9/10 and his competition is a 7/10 and Zaid was a 7/10 and his opponents were 5/10... it's all equal. This isn't Fizer going back and playing with late 1960s players or Zaid time traveling and playing with early 2000s players. You are trying to compare apples and oranges. They were both dominate for their time. Are you now going to try and tell me Babe Ruth isn't one of the greatest power hitters of all-time because he didn't face pitchers throwing 98 mph? Please...