Explosions at Boston Marathon

The news channels are doing it all the time, why can't we discuss it here? Honestly, this is how society works now. With social media, everyone wants to jump on anything to be the first to report it, weather it's true or not. I told my wife last night when they were talking about the third bomb that I'd bet just about any amount of money there was no third, undexploded bomb. That's what sucks about 24 hour news and 24 hour message boards. We have to fill the 20 minutes of real information we get into a 24 hour day. So, when you run out of new stuff to report on, you grab an expert and have them, "Speculate" on what the findings will be, what the next move will be, "What if this would have a nuke?" It's really gotten out of hand.
I don't think "but the news channels do it" or "but people on facebook do it" is necessarily a strong point to make. Regardless of the news channels or facebook I don't think it serves any purpose other than it lets us all point our fingers in the same direction.
 
I don't think "but the news channels do it" or "but people on facebook do it" is necessarily a strong point to make. Regardless of the news channels or facebook I don't think it serves any purpose other than it lets us all point our fingers in the same direction.
It seems more productive to start from a standpoint of it could have been anyone, and then eliminate possible suspects as more information becomes available. Then people saying things like it was definitely al qaeda, or it was a crazy tax-hater militia type.
 
That's a good point, but I personally don't mind the conjecture, even considering the poster involved. I'm obviously interested (as we all are) in the identities of the perpetrators and as you said there is very little conjecture in the media. I'd love to see a little analysis of what's known so far by someone reputable in the intelligence community. Almost 24 hours later, it's a little frustrating to still be so in the dark on this. (It also reveals that I am spoiled by the 24-hour news cycle.)

Yes, but mesa is not this person..... I just found it amusing to the level of mesa's conjecture..... and at that point, these were media statements.... at the rate of unreliable statements made by the media over the past couple of days.. I am not putting any stock on these until there are some official statements made by the FBI.
 
I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's a domestic terrorist, some nutjob who is ****** off at the government. Yesterday was Tax Day.

It seems more productive to start from a standpoint of it could have been anyone, and then eliminate possible suspects as more information becomes available. Then people saying things like it was definitely al qaeda, or it was a crazy tax-hater militia type.

That's not what I said.
 
Yes, but mesa is not this person..... I just found it amusing to the level of mesa's conjecture..... and at that point, these were media statements.... at the rate of unreliable statements made by the media over the past couple of days.. I am not putting any stock on these until there are some official statements made by the FBI.

You link me somewhere that I posted that Mesa was a reputable person in the intelligence community, and I'll eat my shoe.

In the meantime, this is a forum, where people share opinions. Why don't you attack his position instead of trying to silence him?
 
Somebody has got to have seen something or gotten this person in a picture.

It is very likely that someone saw the person(s) responsible and didnt know it or realize it at the time. Think about the size of the crowd both racers and spectators in such a small area. It is my understanding that these bombs were likely in backpacks and it would be very common for both racers and spectators to have a bag of some sort with them so this would not be out of the ordinary.

My point is it would be nearly impossible without time lapse video focused directly on the areas where the bombs went off to have any conclusive evidence that would indicate a suspect. Even then if the person were smart they probably had a hat or hood obstructing their face and the clothing would likely be hard to identify as "unique"
 
I need to learn how to make a legit tourniquet, I think.

I noticed that the guy in the wheelchair who lost his leg - you all know the pic - was being escorted by a guy in a cowboy hat who appeared to have applied a pretty darn effective tourniquet - he even had his hand on it. Despite the gore, it didn't appear that the wound was bleeding anywhere near as much as it should have been. I couldn't help having instant respect for those in that photo.
 
I noticed that the guy in the wheelchair who lost his leg - you all know the pic - was being escorted by a guy in a cowboy hat who appeared to have applied a pretty darn effective tourniquet - he even had his hand on it. Despite the gore, it didn't appear that the wound was bleeding anywhere near as much as it should have been. I couldn't help having instant respect for those in that photo.
That guy is being profiled pretty heavily, he lost his son in Iraq and is being hailed as one of the heroes of the day.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/16/newser-boston-marathon-iconic-photo/2087515/
 
I doubt it was a terrorist group, or at least an organized one. If so, they would have spoken up and taken credit for it. You don't just do something like this, you also want people to know that you (the group) did it, and that you (the group) could do it again
 
I noticed that the guy in the wheelchair who lost his leg - you all know the pic - was being escorted by a guy in a cowboy hat who appeared to have applied a pretty darn effective tourniquet - he even had his hand on it. Despite the gore, it didn't appear that the wound was bleeding anywhere near as much as it should have been. I couldn't help having instant respect for those in that photo.

I think they did an interview with him and he said that was holding an artery. Back and forth on all over the internet, but I thought he said it in a video. Can't watch video at work to confirm if that is true.
 
Yes, but mesa is not this person..... I just found it amusing to the level of mesa's conjecture..... and at that point, these were media statements.... at the rate of unreliable statements made by the media over the past couple of days.. I am not putting any stock on these until there are some official statements made by the FBI.

Just showing where you yourself said from someone in the know..... you questioned why I said stop to mesa..... cause(and I'm going out on a limb here) he is not in the know...

I think it's a little political at this point to be pointing fingers in any specific direction, and at this point we really don't need to be saying it was this group or that group.

i just thought the level of conjecture was a little toolish....and it was vectoring the discussion in a direction that was going to get political very fast. We have the cave for that.
 
Rip a section from your shirt a few inches wide. Find a strong stick. Fold the shirt section over (but make sure it isn't really thin) and then place it above the wound (between the wound and the heart), several inches away from the wound. Put some padding between the skin and the tourniquet. Tie a half knot, put the stick on top of it, then tie a full knot over the stick. Twist the stick until it is tight enough to stop the bleeding.

And write down somewhere (preferably on the tourniquet) when you did that - in applying the tourniquet, you're killing the limb and elapsed time is something that the docs need to know.
 
And write down somewhere (preferably on the tourniquet) when you did that - in applying the tourniquet, you're killing the limb and elapsed time is something that the docs need to know.

yeah, that's what we were taught in Boy Scouts. Also, that it was something to be sure about, because, like you said, you're basically killing the limb, if it's on there for too long. Not something to mess around with unless you're sure.
 
yeah, that's what we were taught in Boy Scouts. Also, that it was something to be sure about, because, like you said, you're basically killing the limb, if it's on there for too long. Not something to mess around with unless you're sure.

Also, you need to ensure you don't try to apply a tourniquet on or at a joint. I believe it needs to be a certain distance from a joint as well, but I can't specifically remember.
 
Based on the pressure cooker information I'd say we can safely narrow the list of suspects down to anyone who can use Google competently. Lucky for me this eliminates my grandma from consideration.