Not trying to be a debbie-downer here but ISU's football program hasn't won more than 6 games in the regular season and the basketball program hasn't been to the NCAA Tournament under Pollard's watch. I don't care about wrestling, women's hoops, or any of the other programs. They don't matter to me and they don't matter to very many people across the country.
I don't particularly care how much revenue has been generated. I don't get to see a penny of that. I care about success on the field. That hasn't happened. In fact, ISU was better in the revenue sports under BVD.
To me, he's been a miserable failure as an AD because he's hired 4 coaches in the sports that matter. 2 of them were failures (Chizik, McDermott). 1 of them seems like he's likely going to be a failure (Hoiberg). And the other has a losing record (though I do realize that is a misleading stat).
In all likelihood, Rhoads won't come close to living up to that contract. It's just the way it is. We don't have the resources to win in football. That's not me having a loser mentality. It's reality. Let's face it, we are lucky we weren't 2-10 or 3-9 this year. A few bounces of the ball the other way and we would have been. And there have been far too many blowout losses to justify this contract.
I just don't see it, guys. I love Coach Rhoads. I hope he's here for 20 years. But I think regular 6-6 and 7-5's is all we can expect. Is that worth $2 million per year over 10 years?
I guess I don't understand all the love for Pollard. Maybe I'm too much of a realist. Like I said, I just don't care about how much revenue ISU is generating. As long as they have enough to keep Hilton and The Jack looking good, I don't care. The money isn't going to us. You guys realize that, right? Win football and basketball games. That's what I care about. Under Pollard, they have not been. Sorry, but it's the truth.