I am no expert but I have an Optoma HD142X in my basement. $550 on amazon and it's full 1080p. Works for me at that pricepoint.
The issue holding back 4k is a LOT of people stream stuff, and almost nobody has the bandwidth to stream 4k. IMO that's why it won't catch on.
When I bought my house I had A+ install our home theater system, and they installed some projector that cost like 2,500. We had a lightening strike that fried all of our electronics for the most part, and I bought an Epson. I can't recommend them enough, because no matter how dark you think your room is, there is always going to be light spilling into it, and people that just don't want to sit in total darkness.
I have a 120 inch screen too and I think it looks great. I'm not a crazy fidelity head though.
I disagree with this point about bandwidth challenges for 4k. A quick Google search has Hulu recommending 13 mbps for 4k. Amazon suggests 15, and Netflix is at 25. Found a USA Today article on the topic from 2017 indicating that about 80% of Americans had access to service at those speeds, and that number is only going up. 4k TVs have been the standard for years now, and their content and delivery is picking up too. This isn't 3D. It's here to stay.
How much data would you eat up streaming 4k? I think Cox starts charging you more once you hit 1 terabyte.I disagree with this point about bandwidth challenges for 4k. A quick Google search has Hulu recommending 13 mbps for 4k. Amazon suggests 15, and Netflix is at 25. Found a USA Today article on the topic from 2017 indicating that about 80% of Americans had access to service at those speeds, and that number is only going up. 4k TVs have been the standard for years now, and their content and delivery is picking up too. This isn't 3D. It's here to stay.
Just doing some browsing, the Epson 1060 is probably what I would buy. Good price and 1080p
What about screens; gray, white, black? I know nothing about what makes a good screen
True but all 4k is not created equal. This includes audio as well. From my experience, a 1080p bluray disc provides a just as good or better picture and audio than most 4k streaming content.
Seems to be that way and paying $8k for a 4k Sony projector would be idiotic.Is Sony still the only manufacturer producing a projector that is truly 4K? Last I looked, everybody else was doing some sort of 1080p upscaling or pixel offset/shifting trickery to simulate 4K resolution. I realize that's why prices have come down on these other brands while Sony's 4K is still priced so high...just curious.