TX fires Herman

You know which program is starting to resemble quickly? Michigan.

If you look at the history of the two programs, there is a lot of myth around them. Not saying they aren't great programs, but both Texas and Michigan have a National Championship or bust mentality, but if you look at their histories, they are NOT Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma and even Notre Dame as far as national championships and consistent championship-level football. They each have a rival they hate (Ohio State and Oklahoma) that is and it drives them crazy.

I just don't think Michigan and Texas are these football factories anymore people think they are/should be. Still absolutely top-15 jobs, and they are always going to get recruits and will win games/put together a conference championship type of season with a national-title level season once every blue moon, but that's it.

Edit: @jdoggivjc beat me to it while I was typing this. Great thoughts man!

If Texas or Michigan got an elite coach they would be in the Alabama or Ohio State talk. The best talent in the country needs a coach that can change a culture of the program and get those 5 stars to play together. Alabama had a lot of old National Titles. If Saban went to Texas in 2007 where would Alabama be right now?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: flycy and motorcy90
What few college football fans there are in the Seattle area really liked Sark FWIW. I sat next to a UW grad and huge Husky fan, and he was really upset when Sark left. The media out here was pretty surprised too. Certainly some of that was the fact that he left for USC, but he was well liked at U Dub.
 
Option 1: Booster pushed this to do something for the sake of doing something, long-term strategy be damned.

Option 2: There was one or more off the field incidents with Herman.

So, basically this is like Nebraska pushing Pelini out after failing to win championships and being a **** or it’s like Nebraska pushing Solich out for not winning championships and some (rumored) off the field issues.

Either way, there’s zero reason Texas shouldn’t have nearly every coach falling over themselves to get this gig. Yet, that’s not the case. That can only mean there’s huge issues with the people behind the scenes, there’s simply no other explanation.
 
Option 1: Booster pushed this to do something for the sake of doing something, long-term strategy be damned.

Option 2: There was one or more off the field incidents with Herman.

So, basically this is like Nebraska pushing Pelini out after failing to win championships and being a **** or it’s like Nebraska pushing Solich out for not winning championships and some (rumored) off the field issues.

Either way, there’s zero reason Texas shouldn’t have nearly every coach falling over themselves to get this gig. Yet, that’s not the case. That can only mean there’s huge issues with the people behind the scenes, there’s simply no other explanation.
I can only imagine how insufferable the boosters and big donors are at Texas. Im picturing a bunch of drunk, racist Foghorn Leghorns.
 
I can only imagine how insufferable the boosters and big donors are at Texas. Im picturing a bunch of drunk, racist Foghorn Leghorns.

Im kind of in this group too. The donors are a good boys club and they want to be treated as such. They don’t want to get blown off or talked down to. Two things I’m sure Herman would do to these people. Herman is someone who doesn’t fit with that group and probably things he’s above them. That is not a good fit. Mac Brown was able to play that game and act like he belonged with the good boys club.
 
Andy Staples had a good story in the Athletic when the first grumbling started. That situation is kind of a mess

This was interesting
"Mack Brown’s run at the turn of the century obscured the fact that Texas hasn’t been a year-in, year-out superpower for most of its history. Herman is only the third coach in the program’s history — Brown and Fred Akers are the others — to win 25 games in his first three years. And as great as Brown was from 1998-2009 (128-27), the Longhorns only won the Big 12 twice in the period."
 
I’m trying to figure out the rationale for this. At this point, I don’t think they’re going to manage to flip back their legacy OL kids who already signed LOI’s with Bama.
 
Andy Staples had a good story in the Athletic when the first grumbling started. That situation is kind of a mess

This was interesting
"Mack Brown’s run at the turn of the century obscured the fact that Texas hasn’t been a year-in, year-out superpower for most of its history. Herman is only the third coach in the program’s history — Brown and Fred Akers are the others — to win 25 games in his first three years. And as great as Brown was from 1998-2009 (128-27), the Longhorns only won the Big 12 twice in the period."
A&M‘s success is driving them crazy.
 
What does it take to start a “coaching search firm?” I feel like me and a couple buddies could do a better job than some of these firms that get paid big bucks to assist in hiring of new coaches. This one makes no sense and doesn’t appear to be a good fit at all if it is Sarkisian.

I say the same thing on draft day about being an NFL GM. I watch ISU, highlights of other games, ignore the combine, and make just as good of personnel decisions.

Let’s start a coaching search & NFL GM advising firm. We can also serve BBQ.
 
  • Like
  • Funny
Reactions: Acylum and aauummm
A&M‘s success is driving them crazy.

A&M hasn't been that successful, though. Largely because they're in the same division as Alabama, and yes, more successful than Texas, but not to the point where you look in their direction and ask why they're not doing that.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron