The money is close enough. If that's mostly streaming it won't be.It wouldn't surprise me if a deal cobbled together from the CW, Apple, and ESPN approaches 25 mil +. That would be enough to keep everyone where they are for one more cycle.
The money is close enough. If that's mostly streaming it won't be.It wouldn't surprise me if a deal cobbled together from the CW, Apple, and ESPN approaches 25 mil +. That would be enough to keep everyone where they are for one more cycle.
The PACN without a network partner to use its power to get the network on Direct TV was a horrible decision by the former commissioner. I understand his thinking, if the league owns the entire channel, they will get all the profit from the channel. But he didn't understand that he needed one of the large media companies pull to get it on many cable or satellite systems.The $17M is separate from the ACCN. Note sure about PACN but it's been a disaster. I imagine Apple will have the PACN do the heavy lifting in their media deal with Apple tv providing the broadcast.
Think we are about to have an answer to your question. Even though many have been laughing, GK probably has done about as good as anyone could considering what he has had to work with. The teams are still part of the PAC after all this time. If he gets a lesser deal signed it means BY could not close the deal.Is this real or is this a public shakedown of GK?
Think we are about to have an answer to your question. Even though many have been laughing, GK probably has done about as good as anyone could considering what he has had to work with. The teams are still part of the PAC after all this time. If he gets a lesser deal signed it means BY could not close the deal.
Lots of PAC people online feeling very confident it's at least 28mil
The money is close enough. If that's mostly streaming it won't be.
Lots of PAC people online feeling very confident it's at least 28mil
The only way George K presents the numbers and can get the conference to stay together is if it is with in 5 million of the Big 12. The PAC10 needs that to save face and not look like an inferior conference in the short term.
Pac10 maybe able to get there but if it is a heavy streaming package that limits visibility of games it still would be in the best of interest of individual schools to jump to the Big 12.
Changing a conference is a huge move breaking decade long partnerships so college's really need major incentive (money/viewership) to make the move.
Part of the reason I think Colorado isn't as "all in" on staying is due to having regrets on jumping from the Bi2 and not succeeding as they thought both on the field and off. CO doesn't have the long standing PAC brand and relationships to concern them either.
Lots of Utah, OSU and WSU peopleLots of PAC people online feeling very confident it's at least 28mil
Lots of PAC people online feeling very confident it's at least 28mil
I'd be surprised if that is the true number. The most optimistic calculations I could come up with only got to $26M per. And if it was truly $28M all this time, why string it out forever and ever?
I could easily believe that is gross, and the conference has to foot the bill for the PACN ($70Mish iirc) and then the net is more like $21M.
It would be nice to find out something today and put this to bed. It would be hilarious though if "the partnerships" are shared but not financials.
Sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. PAC 12 fans can hardly be bothered to go to games or watch them on the premier sports channels. How many of them are going to spring for Apple TV of all things to do that?I have zero doubts that Apple is willing to go $28-30M per school.
The problem is for that price tag, they're going to want more exclusivity and big time games on their platform rather than sublicensing it to someone else. Plus, as we know, the league is still going to be picking up production costs that will only increase over time.
Lots of PAC people online feeling very confident it's at least 28mil
And how does the PAC spin $28M into a win?
It's sure as **** not SEC money. It's not enough to "go shopping" for Big 12 schools
Their ass of a commish has put them into a wonderful lose-lose position even if they stay together
And how does the PAC spin $28M into a win?
It's sure as **** not SEC money. It's not enough to "go shopping" for Big 12 schools
Their ass of a commish has put them into a wonderful lose-lose position even if they stay together
If you read the Denver Post article, their chancellor repeated what some other PAC ADs and Presidents have said about being 3rd highest in revenue when it's over. Now have they seen preliminary numbers that they keep saying it? Or are they setting the expectations so they leave with less-than-ideal numbers? Altimore believes the first. Scheer believes the second. I've seen estimates by Twitter people from $19M each to $40M each, I really don't buy either extreme here. The slightly more sourced people (that still don't know crap) have been from $25M to $32M, and I believe these are possible. Guessing those pushing $28 are going with the law of averages. It sounds like we're gonna know soon. Even if Altimore wins this round, he doesn't seem to understand that all the speculation of teams leaving is going to return as the new contract gets closer to expiring.Thought it was a “layup” that they would beat the Big 12 deal?