Does Pollard Belong On "CyRushmore"? Hell No*

[Kagavi]

Looks like somebody's been studying the Kagavi method of clickbait headline followed by "gotcha" post

For those who are unaware, I had a meltdown in 2022 about the idea of paying players, conferences/teams changing, too many bowl games, etc. I was filled with rage and it all came out. Sorry. I hope time has healed my standing within the ISU community

https://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/players-should-not-be-paid-probably-done-with-isu.271338/

 

[clonechemist]

I do apologize for maybe it not being as polished as I would have written 20 years ago on here, but it took half of Friday to write on my current meds. That’s why I was gone for the past month. Hoping to find something different.

But ultimately I wanted to say that what I’ve always felt - a person and their contributions are far more than a few words here or a topic there. I’m 44, I can tell you the last 22 years have been a hell of a lot more fun than the first 22 years (we’re limiting our discussion to ISU here, lol)

I’m 41 and couldn’t agree more.

The 90s had some great memories and flashes of brilliance.

But Jamie has built a rock solid foundation that outshines any prior accomplishments in sports in ISU history. The easiest way to see this is through the Chizik and Prohm periods. I have no doubt: in prior eras, those hires/fires would’ve led to at least a decade (probably more) of complete devastation for those sports. Jamie was miraculously able to work through those 2 ‘mistakes’ and keep moving forward without skipping a beat.

 

[Cycsk]

I get the point of the article, but I think it was an odd way to present it. Whether he deserves some other honor or not is irrelevant. Last time I checked, Washington was on Mount Rushmore, even though he has a “better” monument on the national wall. Perhaps it would be good to go back to the intention for Mount Rushmore, namely, to present oversized people who will make future generations interested in why they were commemorated. I certainly think Pollard fits that … and more.

The OP presented a dichotomy that isn’t necessary. Let’s just give Pollard his due in whatever ways we can.

 

[DRH]

We’re going to have to agree to disagree. What happens at the athletic department level matters just as much as what happens on the field. He is the reason that we were able to bring in coaches like Campbell and Otz.

Read the whole thing…

 

[DRH]

I get the point of the article, but I think it was an odd way to present it. Whether he deserves some other honor or not is irrelevant. Last time I checked, Washington was on Mount Rushmore, even though he has a “better” monument on the national wall. Perhaps it would be good to go back to the intention for Mount Rushmore, namely, to present oversized people who will make future generations interested in why they were commemorated. I certainly think Pollard fits that … and more.

The OP presented a dichotomy that isn’t necessary. Let’s just give Pollard his due in whatever ways we can.

It’s not that deep…the point is that pollard has been so important that his honor should standalone not be “squished” amongst others.