Help Me Understand Going For Two

IcSyU

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2007
28,294
6,950
113
Cool but OU didn't get to the red zone in the 4th quarter so the defense wasn't terrible all night.

They sort of were the reason ISU was in a position to win the game.
The defense wins that game if they can convert one of the touchdown passes Hurts tried to hand them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: VeloClone

Aclone

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2007
26,870
23,380
113
Des Moines, Ia.
I don't like the result but love the call to go for 2. One play to take the lead? Hell yes.

Over the long run more talented teams tend to win. We had no business being in the position we were in. See if you can make one more play.
I love our quarterback and our offense, but OU’s offense has loads more talent across the board. Going from the 25, they had the decided advantage—including a reliable placekicker.

Just for an example, look what happened once Baylor managed to get TCU into overtime.
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,433
6,941
113
49
I don't like the result but love the call to go for 2. One play to take the lead? Hell yes.

Over the long run more talented teams tend to win. We had no business being in the position we were in. See if you can make one more play.

I agree with going for 2, but there is zero reason ou should ever have been ahead by that much, the piss poor offense in the first half against one of the worst defenses is the country really put us in a hole. People act like ou has 5 stars everywhere, that ou defense is atrocious, and we did nothing for the first half against it.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: VeloClone

CapnCy

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2010
6,199
3,067
113
Loved the call.

What everyone else has said....Hurts in short field, kicking woes for us, etc.

And, you know how this game went we.would.have false started a couple times in OT and drive ourselves.out of FG range, lol.
 

jcisuclones

Well-Known Member
Nov 23, 2011
4,817
5,096
113
Ames, IA
Cool but OU didn't get to the red zone in the 4th quarter so the defense wasn't terrible all night.

They sort of were the reason ISU was in a position to win the game.
Overtime periods start at the 25, smaller field, I don’t trust our defense, especially our sencondary.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,786
24,884
113
I agree with going for 2, but there is zero reason ou should ever have been ahead by that much, the piss poor offense in the first half against one of the worst defenses is the country really put us in a hole. People act like ou has 5 stars everywhere, that ou defense is atrocious, and we did nothing for the first half against it.

As they said on the broadcast, OU goes for the haymaker in the first quarter. Most teams fold. We struggled to get going in that environment. Once we settled down, we were able to play with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aclone

Thomasrickj

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2012
7,870
5,773
113
Arlington, VA
Alabama should. They have more talent than nearly everyone they play. We don't. Talent tends to win in the long run. OU has the talent advantage. Take your shot.
Oklahoma also had 7 points compared to 20 in the fourth quarter. Their secondary needed to make one play when we went for two, but would’ve needed to string together a bunch of good plays to stop us in overtime. They were trending down and we were the better team in the second half, so I respectfully disagree with you.
 

Urbandale2013

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2018
4,789
5,930
113
30
Urbandale
It was the right call and the right play and they freaking made it if there wasn’t horrendous pass interference.

I’m so sick of “let them play”. Not calling penalties is the exact opposite of letting them play. That’s deciding who wins by letting obvious penalties go.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 83cy and Aclone