Even if you go to OT and decide not to ever kick it you possibly get multiple opportunities at the endzone instead of just one.
Help Me Understand Going For Two
- Thread starter Thomasrickj
- Start date
Even if you go to OT and decide not to ever kick it you possibly get multiple opportunities at the endzone instead of just one.
That's an opinion, not a fact. I applaud Campbell's decision.
I agree. I was fine with the ball going to Pettway but there’s no excuse to drop that. Sucks he missed Kolar too
Newsflash: we aren't Alabama.
OU didn't score in the 4th quarter.
And are you calling for going for OT, but then saying ISU couldn't stop OU in the redzone?
I don't know that Kolar was ever an option for Purdy. Read #1 was Hall who they were hoping would be able to slip out and get the safety lost in traffic. The next closest read was Pettway. In Purdy's mind I'm guessing he didn't think he'd have time for a third.
Personally would have preferred to see the pocket move to give Purdy a run/pass option but have no issue with the call.
That was poor play design having Hall drag his defender right into the throwing lane. If Hall isn't there it's an easy toss and catch.
Oh I do as well. I thing it was a great call by Matt to go for it there. Brock should’ve hit his tight end. We’lol beat Texas next week.
That definitely shouldn't be considered a "drop". Defender was all over him and played the ball well.
OU was 100% in the redzone. The defense changes a lot with less field behind you and we couldn’t adapt to that tonight, let alone if the bad 25 yards behind us. I love Matt’s call for going for two.
I misread your last post, but our defense is not the reason we went for it. They were lights out in the second half.
Alabama should. They have more talent than nearly everyone they play. We don't. Talent tends to win in the long run. OU has the talent advantage. Take your shot.
I'm not sure a PAT was much more likely than the 2 point call.
How many FGs did we try tonight? That’s one reason why. Other reason is why the **** not? Pull your nuts out and flop ‘em on the table.
Could be. I think Matt trusted the offense more than the defense with 25 yards behind them though, which we struggled at tonight.
If we win the game on the 2 pt conversion that would be the greatest play ever and the right call.
I knew they’d score after the INT and hoped they’d go for 2. Sucks to lose like that but play better from the start of the game and it doesn’t matter.
Cool but OU didn't get to the red zone in the 4th quarter so the defense wasn't terrible all night.
They sort of were the reason ISU was in a position to win the game.
