They have loses @ Wake Forest, @ Clemson and home against Stephen F. Austin....
Thanks for listing three teams better than Nebraska
Last edited:
They have loses @ Wake Forest, @ Clemson and home against Stephen F. Austin....
40 for me.I survived 29 years so far. Still going strong. Very few of us though, let me tell you.
I was just pointing out that Bolton shoots under 40% from the floor. Maybe Jackson should take some of his minutes next year.Yeah I was just saying Jackson and Bolton were better 3 point shooters is all
I don't understand how any Big10 fan can sit there and say "their schedule has been brutal" or "Big 10 is a grind, its the best conference" blah blah when you don't even play every team twice. What a jokeI think they're just meh. But their schedule has been brutal. They have some decent talent but little depth is one of their main problems. Oturu is a beast but tends to wear out late. If he comes back next year they should be good. They're kind of a basketball version of the Cyclones football team.
That's how a ton of conferences work though.. Top to bottom the Big 10 is the toughest conference, but there looks to be a bunch of good teams and not any great teams.I don't understand how any Big10 fan can sit there and say "their schedule has been brutal" or "Big 10 is a grind, its the best conference" blah blah when you don't even play every team twice. What a joke
You think they should play 26 conference games? Then you'd ***** when 16 win teams get in the tournament ahead of 20 win teams with schedules loaded with cupcakes.I don't understand how any Big10 fan can sit there and say "their schedule has been brutal" or "Big 10 is a grind, its the best conference" blah blah when you don't even play every team twice. What a joke
Well put. The playing every team twice argument is just dumb. Arguing about conference size is also dumb. Just on quantity of teams in the tournament the BIG 10 might have 1 or two teams make a decent run in the tourney but we really don't have any threats at the title. Possible but I'd be surprised if any get past Elite 8 territory.That's how a ton of conferences work though.. Top to bottom the Big 10 is the toughest conference, but there looks to be a bunch of good teams and not any great teams.
Well put. The playing every team twice argument is just dumb. Arguing about conference size is also dumb. Just on quantity of teams in the tournament the BIG 10 might have 1 or two teams make a decent run in the tourney but we really don't have any threats at the title. Possible but I'd be surprised if any get past Elite 8 territory.
IDK. You're the gambler. Bet against them.How much does Iowa lose by tomorrow?
It's an ideal setup currently. I love the once in FB, twice in Bball.I love playing every team twice in basketball and every team in football. But obviously that isn't an option in bigger conferences so it is what it is.
IDK. You're the gambler. Bet against them.
How the Big 12 is currently set up combined with the usual strength of almost all of the teams leads to an incredibly tough conference schedule. This year that's not the case with the conference being down. Using that as an argument to say a conference isn't tough is not fair though considering we're one of the only P5 conferences that does it that way.Well put. The playing every team twice argument is just dumb. Arguing about conference size is also dumb. Just on quantity of teams in the tournament the BIG 10 might have 1 or two teams make a decent run in the tourney but we really don't have any threats at the title. Possible but I'd be surprised if any get past Elite 8 territory.
I'd guess the line is going to be Iowa (-1.5) or Iowa (-2.5).How much does Iowa lose by tomorrow?
No. But I think you should bet against them.You think they lose too?
I bet Iowa +8 @ Sparty.. I was screaming when Garza fouled Cassius at the end for no reason other than frustration. Thought there was no way he was going to miss his 3rd FT of the night there.No. But I think you should bet against them.