Click bait. Where is the report about Iowa being #7 with the most athletic related debt?
College football championship opponents Michigan and Washington owe $263 million and $244 million, respectively, in athletics-related debt.
www.sportico.com
View attachment 153141
Here's the thing about all this, and it also ties to the recent CF pod about program values by the Athletic.
All this business and financial stuff, you can't simplify it to just one number, or even two numbers. A&M with $279M debt -- but if they have $750M in revenue annually, that's a lot different than say Arizona St with just a little more debt, but maybe half the revenue. A&M can afford to service and payoff that debt over time, where ASU will never get out from under it.
Similar to the Athletic article. You can't value a business just as a multiple of revenue without looking at other factors. If KU has $400M in revenue but $350M in costs, they are not worth the same as KSU with $400M in revenue but $250M in costs. It's pretty easy to understand.
You need to know debt level, costs and thus profit, cash flow. And that's not even to talk about trying to value the "brand name" which is also a significant factor in what a program would be worth. But you get these dumb articles because it's easy to get one simple number. And because there is A number given, laypeople take it like its handed down by from Mt Sinai.
And I get it, its hard to do a real analysis- you have to tease out costs and debt by program, financials get massaged and you have to sort that out, private schools may not release any info, and there are just a lot of schools to do this for. Its a months' worth of work. No journalist is doing that for an online article. But I bet a nickel the PE folks have done it. Heck, if the data was relatively easy to get, I would do it for fun.
Sorry for finance rant.