That's just crazy to see at a 2A school though. Oelwein has some serious challenges in that community though.see that quite often in 8 man
Stanton, who once was a pretty good football program in 8 man, has had to cancel games this season.
That's just crazy to see at a 2A school though. Oelwein has some serious challenges in that community though.see that quite often in 8 man
Stanton, who once was a pretty good football program in 8 man, has had to cancel games this season.
I think they lost kids going out again when they went back up. They have a very good group of Juniors out for football, and very few seniors. I saw them play Colfax at the start of the season and they looked a lot better than the game I saw them play last season. They are fighting for a playoff spot, but they have to win this week or beat Madrid next week to get one, and they will not beat Madrid.It worked.. sorta.
They had 3 winless seasons when they went back up. Probably another adjustment period.
Agreed.That was a good start but if you look back at how many schools switched classes in was in the single digits if I remember right. Look at DSM Roosevelt or Lincoln, they've both won a single football game this year but they're in the top 10 schools by BEDS numbers.
I know that no matter what you do there will always be winners and losers but the state needs to do something with those schools. It's a viscous cycle, the teams suck because they can't get kids to go out but why would the kids go out if they don't think they have a chance to be competitive.
Wayne was horrible before they went to 8 man, struggling to win a game, they were hoping that by dropping down they would play smaller schools and get some wins, and build back up their program. Looks like seeing their win total from those years it did work.
I think they lost kids going out again when they went back up. They have a very good group of Juniors out for football, and very few seniors. I saw them play Colfax at the start of the season and they looked a lot better than the game I saw them play last season. They are fighting for a playoff spot, but they have to win this week or beat Madrid next week to get one, and they will not beat Madrid.
Good to know, I was told by a parent from one of the players that they were in position to get into the playoff, but they thought they had to win one more game to get in. Wayne should be pretty good next season, and then back to struggling to win games after that.They are in the playoffs. Looking at their standings, they should be the #4 seed out of that district.
There's some schools, like Waterloo East, who should be dropped down to 8 man. I don't care how big they are, they had 23 juniors and seniors total out for football this year. The school would be pissed, the opponents would be pissed but it'd be the right thing to do considering how small their roster is.Agreed.
I look at a Waterloo East and you didn't solve any of their problems by letting them move down to 4A. Getting blown out by West Delaware, Decorah and Western Dubuque doesn't do them any better than getting blown out by City West, Kennedy and Liberty.
Now you put them in 2A with Jesup, Iowa Falls and Vinton and, maybe, they have a chance to be competitive right up until those towns scream bloody murder about a school that size being in 2A.
The IHSAA is eventually going to have to be the bad guy in this and make a decision and policy that makes this more fair. There are hardly any competitive games Friday nights anymore.
That was a good start but if you look back at how many schools switched classes in was in the single digits if I remember right. Look at DSM Roosevelt or Lincoln, they've both won a single football game this year but they're in the top 10 schools by BEDS numbers.
I know that no matter what you do there will always be winners and losers but the state needs to do something with those schools. It's a viscous cycle, the teams suck because they can't get kids to go out but why would the kids go out if they don't think they have a chance to be competitive.
Good to know, I was told by a parent from one of the players that they were in position to get into the playoff, but they thought they had to win one more game to get in. Wayne should be pretty good next season, and then back to struggling to win games after that.
The problem with those schools isn't the size of the student body. Lincoln is the 3rd or 4th biggest school in the state, another 100 kids in the school isn't going to make them competitive in football.Make the schools more appealing to attend? Make kids and families say......
"Hey, I think we might pull our kids out of Waukee and open enroll them to Hoover."
Easier said than done. Not sure what the answer is.
recently officiated madridI think they lost kids going out again when they went back up. They have a very good group of Juniors out for football, and very few seniors. I saw them play Colfax at the start of the season and they looked a lot better than the game I saw them play last season. They are fighting for a playoff spot, but they have to win this week or beat Madrid next week to get one, and they will not beat Madrid.
They are in the playoffs. Looking at their standings, they should be the #4 seed out of that district.
Good to know, I was told by a parent from one of the players that they were in position to get into the playoff, but they thought they had to win one more game to get in. Wayne should be pretty good next season, and then back to struggling to win games after that.
The problem with those schools isn't the size of the student body. Lincoln is the 3rd or 4th biggest school in the state, another 100 kids in the school isn't going to make them competitive in football.
I'm not sure what you are reading, but I'm pointing out that it's pretty easy for a coach to limit his participation and roster size through various means. If there's an incentive to do so, there are coaches that are going to do it. That could be through direct cuts, that could be setting up a situation where kids that do other sports have no shot to play (as in my example of a "weed out"), where your kids buried on the depth chart get pounded by the starters in practice, scream at kids until they quit, etc. None of those things are positive.You went from cutting kids is what you were suggesting to now a coach wanting kids to work out and not playing the kids that do, two totally different things.
The thing about sports participation is that in programs that win, the kids want to be part of the success. They are going to go that extra mile, summer workouts, going to camps to get on the field. At schools that are not winning and have little to no success in a sport like the DM metro schools, kids are not going to put in the time and effort without the reward at the end.
Its the same reason schools like BGM are playing 8 man when they could be playing 11 man, they can win more games in 8 man, get into the playoffs and maybe win a championship, which is never going to happen playing 11 man.
Oh, the school just needs to hire a coach to motivate the kids into coming out, that sounds great and easy, but kids today are not going listen. Hell most schools are struggling to hire a coach, and now we are going to hire coaching that are motivators also. Good luck with that.
That might be a bit extreme. Maybe make them play A or 1A 11 man. I bet 23 juniors and seniors is bigger than a lot of 8 man or A rosters, but I don't know that for sure.There's some schools, like Waterloo East, who should be dropped down to 8 man. I don't care how big they are, they had 23 juniors and seniors total out for football this year. The school would be pissed, the opponents would be pissed but it'd be the right thing to do considering how small their roster is.
It may not matter in Waterloo much longer if the community approves the merger of the two high schools.There's some schools, like Waterloo East, who should be dropped down to 8 man. I don't care how big they are, they had 23 juniors and seniors total out for football this year. The school would be pissed, the opponents would be pissed but it'd be the right thing to do considering how small their roster is.
There are plenty of kids at Lincoln, East, Roosevelt, North and Hoover that are or could be good at football. It's getting them to go out and not open enroll. Football is the most extreme case, but there are some other sports where it's similar.They might if a lot of those kids are good at football.
PC would like to get into the SCC but they don’t want them.
Under the BEDS count system there is no need to run kids off or limit participation for the sport. Since they are counting the total number of kids in grades 9,10 and 11, whether you have 50 kids out or you have run off 20 and now only have 30 does not matter, your classification would stay the same.I'm not sure what you are reading, but I'm pointing out that it's pretty easy for a coach to limit his participation and roster size through various means. If there's an incentive to do so, there are coaches that are going to do it. That could be through direct cuts, that could be setting up a situation where kids that do other sports have no shot to play (as in my example of a "weed out"), where your kids buried on the depth chart get pounded by the starters in practice, scream at kids until they quit, etc. None of those things are positive.
Like you said, a school like BGM can win championships in 8 man and would not be able to in 11 man. I think we are agreeing that there's a benefit to playing in a smaller class. And if a coach can weed out his roster through various means to keep only his best X players, there are going to be coaches that do that. Not every coach, maybe not most. But some are going to think that way. Some coaches already like to employ cuts and weed out numbers just for the sake of making practices more manageable and managing reps.
I'm not saying there's anything we're going to do to make schools with poor traditions or poor socioeconomic situations get good participation rates. What I'm saying is let's not provide an incentive where programs that do have high participation to want to reduce participation to be able to compete in a lower class. Le
They were in the conference when my oldest son went through school, and then left, no since letting them back in now. Hell they took Cardinal in the conference might as well add Van Buren as opposed to PC.Hell no we don't want them!![]()