Another Female Teacher 'Incident'

cowgirl836

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2009
51,156
42,778
113
This is obviously wrong and illegal. At the same time, most 16-17 year old boys will f**k anything that moves. I’m not sure how much they’re “victims” here.


Do you feel the same way about men in their 30/40s having sex with 16-17yr old girls? Are those girls victims or no?
 

twincyties

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
4,564
6,925
113
Do you feel the same way about men in their 30/40s having sex with 16-17yr old girls? Are those girls victims or no?
I would say it depends. In all cases - both men and women. Again, I understand the age of consent makes this and open and closed case from a legal perspective. And I’m surely not condoning it.

My point is that 16-17 is old enough to be manipulated, but it’s also old enough to do exactly what you’re doing.

It also appears in this case that they were paying her which raises some additional questions.
 

cowgirl836

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2009
51,156
42,778
113
Doubt many 16/17 y/o girls would pay to have sex with 40 y/o men.

Plenty of the stories in this thread didn't involve payment but the sentiment remains. There is a belief that it's somehow different if it's a coerced 16yr old boy vs 16 yr old girl.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: isufbcurt

twincyties

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
4,564
6,925
113
Plenty of the stories in this thread didn't involve payment but the sentiment remains. There is a belief that it's somehow different if it's a coerced 16yr old boy vs 16 yr old girl.
I am not sure as many people think that as you may think. The question about payment in this case does raise some questions about whether or not their was coercion.
 

Cyforce

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2009
17,162
13,035
113
Des Moines
Plenty of the stories in this thread didn't involve payment but the sentiment remains. There is a belief that it's somehow different if it's a coerced 16yr old boy vs 16 yr old girl.

My only point is if you're paying for sex I have difficulty seeing you as a victim.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: cowgirl836

cowgirl836

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2009
51,156
42,778
113
I am not sure as many people think that as you may think. The question about payment in this case does raise some questions about whether or not their was coercion.

They have **** for pre frontal cortex. They were making decisions they cannot accurately comprehend and consent to. That's why the laws exist.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: IsUaClone2 and MJ29

twincyties

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2009
4,564
6,925
113
They have **** for pre frontal cortex. They were making decisions they cannot accurately comprehend and consent to. That's why the laws exist.
Understand why the law exists. And again, the idea of legal age of consent is therefore clear cut. The idea of coercion is not. And I’m sure that even you would agree that the prenfrontal cortex doesn’t magically switch on at your 18th birthday party nor does it develop at the same rate for everyone.
 

cowgirl836

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2009
51,156
42,778
113
Understand why the law exists. And again, the idea of legal age of consent is therefore clear cut. The idea of coercion is not. And I’m sure that even you would agree that the prenfrontal cortex doesn’t magically switch on at your 18th birthday party nor does it develop at the same rate for everyone.

Of course not, it isn't fully developed until mid 20s. Which gives credence to the fact that these teens were making decisions they were not capable of and taken advantage of for that fact.
 

scyclonekid

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2008
9,413
3,878
113
Whatever happened to just giving the teacher an apple or students getting a sticker? It’s terrible teachers are preying on students sexually. Mentally sick people.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,937
20,827
113
It's interesting that people assume teenage girls are asexual or something. The difference is our culture celebrates and promotes the open sexuality of one gender and suppresses and shames it in another. And that has ramifications.
I think it might be partly this, but maybe more a view that boys in their teens typically do not have the emotional tie to it to the extent girls do, and as a result can just think it's awesome and move on without emotional damage.

I'll admit I do tend to think of a boy that age to be more likely than a girl to not be emotionally damaged by that type of relationship, but there's probably a healthy dose of social conditioning rather than actual fact leading me to that opinion.
 

besserheimerphat

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
11,422
15,176
113
Mount Vernon, WA
I think it might be partly this, but maybe more a view that boys in their teens typically do not have the emotional tie to it to the extent girls do, and as a result can just think it's awesome and move on without emotional damage.

I'll admit I do tend to think of a boy that age to be more likely than a girl to not be emotionally damaged by that type of relationship, but there's probably a healthy dose of social conditioning rather than actual fact leading me to that opinion.
It certainly reinforces an unhealthy attitude towards sexual relationships, and is likely to impact their future relationships. So it may not reach the level for you to consider it "emotional abuse" but it still shapes the young person's developing worldview.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: cowgirl836 and MJ29