Wind Energy in Iowa...Your Thoughts

ArgentCy

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
20,405
11,148
113
The cool thing right now is there are some really, really smart people working on it. I took a group of students to Argonne National Laboratory last Spring and saw just a few things that they are working on. I'm not an electrochemist, and I haven't reviewed many of the things that they are working on, but it looks very, very promising.

In case you are curious:
https://www.anl.gov/tcp/energy-storage

That really isn't all that much different than what we were working on 20 years ago. Just some small iterative improvements to Li Batteries. Nothing that is going to scale to anything close to power grid levels.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,669
63,738
113
Not exactly sure.
Solar is way more cost effective than wind. I looked at both for a business I have and both wind and solar was me guessing if I could out think inflation and lifetime of equipment so I walked away from it.

I would prefer wind,oil and others went the way of ethanol. The subsidies are gone but the renewaable fuels standard keep them blending it in to make it competitive. This keeps them refining the process and improving it along the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY

crawfy54

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2006
1,993
368
113
Ames, Iowa
As a supply chain guy, this is where my mind goes as well. Windmills, contrary to popular belief, aren't grown from tiny windmill seeds.

*pauses for collective gasps*

There is a ton of energy being used to produce, ship, and construct these bad boys. They are expensive, the money they have to pay land owners is incredibly high, and the people that erect and maintain them are paid very well. As the link below states, each one is $3-4 million to build and install. Not sure on maintenance costs.

So, the question, to me, is how long does it take for each of these windmills to produce $3-4 million worth of energy? And for the record, I'm neither for or against them. However, if the ROI isn't anywhere near their cost, is it worth continuing down the same path or should those dollars and resources be better spent looking into something else?

http://www.windustry.org/how_much_do_wind_turbines_cost
A third-party maintenance contract could be anywhere from $10-50k/year/turbine, depending on the scope of work.

Many of the turbines in Iowa are producing 1.5-2.5 MW/hr at full capacity (usually need wind speed >10m/s) Average cost of electricity for consumers is $0.12/KWhr. Power purchasing agreements between wind farm owners and utilities vary from state to state and utility to utility. I would guess many of the newer contracts are around $0.04/KWhr. On a good wind day, wind farm owners are making about $2k/turbine.
 

Stewo

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2008
16,856
14,812
113
Iowa
A third-party maintenance contract could be anywhere from $10-50k/year/turbine, depending on the scope of work.

Many of the turbines in Iowa are producing 1.5-2.5 MW/hr at full capacity (usually need wind speed >10m/s) Average cost of electricity for consumers is $0.12/KWhr. Power purchasing agreements between wind farm owners and utilities vary from state to state and utility to utility. I would guess many of the newer contracts are around $0.04/KWhr. On a good wind day, wind farm owners are making about $2k/turbine.

So, roughly 15-20 years to make the money back?
 

crawfy54

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2006
1,993
368
113
Ames, Iowa
So, roughly 15-20 years to make the money back?
I'm not sure on total costs of shipping, construction, large-corrective repairs etc. Would have to think there is a massive savings per turbine when you build 100 turbines vs 1 turbine. Ive always been told the goal is to make money back after 10 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyclonePigskin

CtownCyclone

Midnight Rider
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 20, 2010
16,834
9,133
113
Where they love the governor
Solar is way more cost effective than wind. I looked at both for a business I have and both wind and solar was me guessing if I could out think inflation and lifetime of equipment so I walked away from it.

I would prefer wind,oil and others went the way of ethanol. The subsidies are gone but the renewaable fuels standard keep them blending it in to make it competitive. This keeps them refining the process and improving it along the way.

On that tangent...
One of the new parts of my neighborhood was developed in conjunction with a mini "Smart Grid" type application that has a solar field nearby. The houses are also highly energy efficient (2x6 construction, high SEER heat pumps, well-sealed for tightness, heat pump water heater, etc). The idea is that the people buying the houses give the electrical utility the right to determine how they get powered for the next however many years. They've done some interesting things with cycling power from main grid to gas generator to solar to battery backup to see the effects and help plan out how they want to do things in the future.

I'm partially jealous that when a storm knocks power out, they stay on. But that's more on the power company maintaining their right-of-way.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CyclonePigskin

cydsho

Well-Known Member
Apr 10, 2006
4,371
5,829
113
Omaha, NE
We've been subsidizing farmers for decades and we just paid out more subsidies to farmers to offset negative impacts from tariffs we willingly put in place.
In fact, find pretty much any industry and the government has probably subsidized it one way or another. So yeah some subsidies suck and are stupid.
Subsidizing new renewable energy sources have a very positive effect for the country. Higher tech job in the renewable energy field that replace lost manufacturing jobs is a good thing. Not to mention more energy independence.
As people have mentioned, there have been some vast improvement in renewable energy efficiency that would have taken decades without some subsidized help.
I posted this link in another thread but it is interesting to see how the development of renewable energy has grown because of the subsidies.
http://rameznaam.com/2019/04/02/the-third-phase-of-clean-energy-will-be-the-most-disruptive-yet/
Not many really like government spending in the private sector (me included) but sometimes it can be used correctly to "prime the pump".
 

ISU22CY

Well-Known Member
Dec 15, 2012
5,118
6,737
113
Iowa
So you're against ethanol too right? This is always a tough subject for me because fiscally I don't believe in subsidies. However ethically, sometimes we the people need to invest in things that can't be sustained on their own for the benefit of our future. Works great for government (tax payer owned projects like NASA, DOT, etc) but I REALLY have a hard time subsidizing privately owned projects where someone else is profiting off of my taxes.

Something to consider; the government is not in the business of running a utility company. So, in all likelihood they would outsource the local management to a private company if they did "own" the turbines. They would likely be paying out the rear for the services to manage said projects, properties, utilities, etc. So, I'd be interested to see the cost difference of what these companies make in subsidies to run/own the projects vs what their projected revenue would look like if they were instead hired as a contractor to run the projects on behalf of a government owned entity. The government would still have substantial costs in leasing property, buying equipment, and then the additional fees of outsourcing the management. I mean, look at what the DOD spends on private contractors vs doing it themselves.
The ethanol subsidies ended in 2012 correct?
 

Beernuts

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2017
1,308
1,321
113
56
When I asked the question, I used the wrong word...hoax...my mistake.

What I meant to ask was if you think the industry is a positive or negative to our society.

One item that I haven't seen discussed is the disturbance to the farmland, and the changes the wind structures, electrical lines, service roads, substations etc do to our soil.
 

Bluffers

Active Member
Sep 16, 2009
187
139
43
Ames
Thorium would seem to me the path to our energy future. Relatively clean nuclear and very, very cheap. The big pushback is proliferation and inability to control who is making the stuff.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: hlb76 and crawfy54

AirWalke

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2006
7,040
1,625
113
Des Moines
Crowing about the subsidies that wind energy products is a waste of time. Let's ditch all subsidies for gas, oil, nuclear, etc. Then we can truly see how expensive energy actually is without government support.

As far as the eyesore comments, I think it all depends on how you view renewables. I live right by a wind farm and often see those red blinking lights at night as I'm driving home from work. Doesn't bother me one bit. During the day all those turbines moving as one is an impressive sight to see. I'd much rather be looking at dozens of turbines than pillars of smoke from a coal plant.
 

AirWalke

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2006
7,040
1,625
113
Des Moines
The sound would drive me crazy. Friends who love about 1 1/2 miles away always have a sound whooshing from them. Even at that distance.

I wonder if it depends on the prevailing wind direction. I live about a mile from ours and cannot hear it from inside or outside of the house. Maybe it if it was pointed out to me, I might be able to hear it, but it's clearly not enough to bother me.

I do feel bad for the people living right around them on some level, though. I imagine the money is probably nice, as you'd have to give up portions of your land to have them built on, but for those of us that live close by instead of under them, it doesn't seem like much of a nuisance.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NoCreativity

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,803
3,686
113
Menlo, Iowa
It takes energy to obtain the materials, manufacture, ship, and install these. Energy produced by fossil fuels usually. I’d only be interested to see how long it takes to recoup that.. if it takes a year or two I guess it’s worth it. If it’s 10+ plus years it’s silly.

After being around a wind farm project this past year I can tell you there is a lot more that does into it than at first glance. You have to move soil to put these up. You have to build road after road after road to get them to the site. You have to rebuild county roads to get them to site. You have to build more roads to drive the cranes down. You have to have paths for the cranes helpers to go down. There is another path the lines are buried in. The best part of this all that exposed soil has washed like crazy the past year and it wont be right for years to come if ever. There is cement that has to manufactured and hauled to site. There is rock that is mined, put on trains, unloaded, put on trucks and taken to the site. There are turbine parts that are made in China, hauled to a port there, put on ships, boated to the West Coast, put on trains, unloaded in DSM, put on trucks, and hauled to the site. There is no little environmental footprint to putting these up. To top that off the crews working on them seem to have no regard for others property or the environment. Someone must be making major money putting these up because there seems to be no shortage of cash being spent.
 

kingcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 16, 2006
22,803
3,686
113
Menlo, Iowa
I would not want one in my back anywhere close to my house. Having them 5 miles away is bad enough and all I have to do is look at them, not live in there shadows or listen to them run.
 

crawfy54

Well-Known Member
Dec 28, 2006
1,993
368
113
Ames, Iowa
After being around a wind farm project this past year I can tell you there is a lot more that does into it than at first glance. You have to move soil to put these up. You have to build road after road after road to get them to the site. You have to rebuild county roads to get them to site. You have to build more roads to drive the cranes down. You have to have paths for the cranes helpers to go down. There is another path the lines are buried in. The best part of this all that exposed soil has washed like crazy the past year and it wont be right for years to come if ever. There is cement that has to manufactured and hauled to site. There is rock that is mined, put on trains, unloaded, put on trucks and taken to the site. There are turbine parts that are made in China, hauled to a port there, put on ships, boated to the West Coast, put on trains, unloaded in DSM, put on trucks, and hauled to the site. There is no little environmental footprint to putting these up. To top that off the crews working on them seem to have no regard for others property or the environment. Someone must be making major money putting these up because there seems to be no shortage of cash being spent.
Which wind farm do you live near, if you don't mind me asking. Every construction site I have been on has 3rd party environmental staff on site to mitigate as much damage as possible.
 

CyJack2299

Active Member
Mar 26, 2019
60
101
33
51
So moving soil for millions of feet of tile lines is ok, but the second you put in a 100x100 foot pad of concrete, it's not?

Edit: Never mind the 16th of an inch of topsoil we erode every single year.
 

Skyh13

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2006
7,460
4,372
113
When I asked the question, I used the wrong word...hoax...my mistake.

What I meant to ask was if you think the industry is a positive or negative to our society.

One item that I haven't seen discussed is the disturbance to the farmland, and the changes the wind structures, electrical lines, service roads, substations etc do to our soil.

I suggest you go back and read the existing posts, because there has been at least some substantive discussion. If you're actually looking for it. I'm skeptical. You don't start out asking if something is a "hoax" looking for a real discussion.

My bet is that it's a net positive, based on generating some energy in a renewable way as well as the investments into technology which will further our ability to head towards more renewable energy in the future. Does this mean we should stick with wind energy forever? Not necessarily. It doesn't have to be perfect to be good, and if it isn't perfect, that doesn't mean it's bad. EMBRACE NUANCE.
 

throwittoblythe

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2006
3,931
4,636
113
Minneapolis, MN
I don't even understand how this happens:
Windmill-Wind-Turbine-Explosion.gif

Looks to me like a very windy day. At high winds/rotational velocity, the tips of the blades start to flex backward. That GIF looks like blades bent backward far enough to come in contact with the tower. You see the one blade start to come apart right after it goes by the tower. Then you see a small "explosion" about 2/3 way up the tower, right where the blades cross it.

I think the threshold is typically something like 30mph winds, max. That's why on crazy windy days, the turbines aren't rotating. They put them in "wind vane mode" which means the blades are turned 90 degrees so they don't resist the wind and then the top of the tower is free-turning so it matches whatever direction the wind is coming from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crawfy54

Help Support Us

Become a patron