stretching for understanding. your dismissiveness is a microagression. MODS! MODS!
You are seriously stretching.
You are seriously stretching.
Just because he was mean to people doesnt mean he treated people of different races different. While being a mean coach isn't necessarily something good, its not against the law. This is Division One Athletics.
She directly addresses the race issue. I thought she explained herself very well. I tend to lean in favor of Fennelly in all of this, but this made me think a little. It's certainly a lot more thought provoking than that crap the former prof wrote.
So why wrote support for someone who accused him of racism? I can understand if she writes to someone who sues for his behavior. That's why it's confusing to me.
She included the following, which if true, could be damaging I would think.
I don’t know if Fennelly is racist in the conventional sense, but I do know if you are not a favorite, he has no compunction about attacking you in racial terms. I witnessed it and others did as well.
She included the following, which if true, could be damaging I would think.
I don’t know if Fennelly is racist in the conventional sense, but I do know if you are not a favorite, he has no compunction about attacking you in racial terms. I witnessed it and others did as well.
Just because he was mean to people doesnt mean he treated people of different races different. While being a mean coach isn't necessarily something good, its not against the law. This is Division One Athletics.
Nikki was never Academic All Conference 1st (3.2 GPA and above) or 2nd (3.0-3.19GPA) team in her time at ISU and she was never an ISU Scholar Athlete.
I'm sorry but you need far better than a 3.0 to even have a remote chance to get into Vet School and it appears she did not have above a 3.0 GPA in Communication Studies.
Yeah, that doesn't sound good, but it's still not clear. It does raise curiosity.
As far as anyone knows the law firm representing Moody help write that. She left Drake because of a coaching conflict and then writes this. Maybe she has an issue with authority figures?
You're wrong. And that's a fact
The only way you could know that is if you wrote it. Did you?
Pretty sure I didn't say she didn't write it. I suggested she might have had help.Nope. But it's a fact she wrote it. Keep your conspiracy theories going though...this is good reading.
My current prediction after reading through all this. If this gets by the judge as worthy for trial, I think they will get into depositions. Attorney's will see a chance to settle along the way where no one is at fault, and they all get paid. Of course Moody will get some but not as much as she'd like. Giving up that to not run the risk of losing her case. Both sides will go their separate ways as you do with settlements. BF will "decide" its time to retire, and a new day will come to the ISU WBB program, good or bad.
Nope. But it's a fact she wrote it. Keep your conspiracy theories going though...this is good reading.
I may not have to advise top girls basketball players in SD that they do not want to play for that guy anymore. I contacted the coach of one player, and soon found out that she already knew enough to not consider it.
Edit: For those that are adding to my comment, I did not say there are a lot of D1 players from SD, I did not say I contact every player. If I heard of a D1 recruit that was possibly considering ISU, I would try to let them know. Has been only one so far.