I find it odd that an Iowa State fan would be so against paying a coach their fair market value.
What's his fair market value in your opinion? Because in mine, it's not $3 million per year.
I find it odd that an Iowa State fan would be so against paying a coach their fair market value.
What's his fair market value in your opinion? Because in mine, it's not $3 million per year.
Then when he leaves, you should be on here defending that stance.
You act like Iowa State is in a stronger bargaining position than Hoiberg. The extension signed last summer said one thing to everyone. First, Fred is not looking at moving on to another college job, unless it's perfect (Kentucky, unc, duke, etc), and even then it is extremely unlikely he'd leave. Second, his agent is making sure that the nba knows he will talk to them.
He's already turned down overtures from the nba. And that's before this run, his phone will ring and ring this off season.
Then you have to account for all of the positive publicity he's brought to the university. Part of it is helping his bargaining position, but how much Iowa State merchandise, how many inquiries to the university from high school kids all over the country, how many new fans has he brought to Iowa State???
You see dollars in a contract, the reality is he's brought that to the university ten fold. People talk about Ferentz, how much money has he brought to the u of I?
So if we lose him because of unwillingness to compensate him at market value determined by what people are willing to pay, I expect you, and stormin to be here arguing it's ok to go back to McDermott era quality, because it's affordable.
Count me in to sell our souls to the devil and give every coin available to Fred.
Not sure how much each soul will fetch...
This won't be popular - but they need to strongly consider removing the upper deck student section. The students only fill it 3-4 times a year and those seats could be generating much needed revenue.
But those tickets are being sold for less to students than to normal people AND arguably more important is the loss of concession and apparel sales (though I don't know what percent of that equates to revenue).
There are several parts to this equation:
- How much is Fred worth to Iowa State?
- How much does Fred want to be paid?
- How much does Fred want available to pay assistant coaches?
- How much is the AD willing to pay Fred?
- How much is the AD willing to pay assistant coaches?
- How much is the AD willing to shell out for other improvements to the BB program?
- How much autonomy is Fred desiring to run his program?
- How much autonomy is the administration willing to give Fred?
- How large of buyouts is Fred willing to live with in his contract?
- How large of bonuses does Fred want in his contract?
- How large of bonuses is the AD willing to put in Fred's contract?
At this point way too much speculating over bullet #1 and #4 are taking place without considering all of the other factors. What does Fred want? is the most important question here. What if Fred's #1 priority is improvements to Hilton Coliseum? Should that money be put into a raise for Fred anyway to satisfy a bunch of fans instead? That would be really dumb if that is the case.
Did anyone consider that perhaps the conversation as to what Fred wanted occured prior to his previous contract and those needs were met. Perhaps he has other priorities at this point. How nice would it be to be able to give substantial raises to his assistants - whether he keeps them or has to hire someone else the money is nice to have the very best in those positions. Fred has a degree is finance, I believe. These realities are not lost on him.
The important thing is that the conversation happen after every season to make sure that Fred is happy and feels he is being treated fairly and the program and staff working for him are being treated fairly. If that is happening, we will find Fred succumbing to the lure of other opportunities less likely.
Then when he leaves, you should be on here defending that stance.
You act like Iowa State is in a stronger bargaining position than Hoiberg. The extension signed last summer said one thing to everyone. First, Fred is not looking at moving on to another college job, unless it's perfect (Kentucky, unc, duke, etc), and even then it is extremely unlikely he'd leave. Second, his agent is making sure that the nba knows he will talk to them.
He's already turned down overtures from the nba. And that's before this run, his phone will ring and ring this off season.
Then you have to account for all of the positive publicity he's brought to the university. Part of it is helping his bargaining position, but how much Iowa State merchandise, how many inquiries to the university from high school kids all over the country, how many new fans has he brought to Iowa State???
You see dollars in a contract, the reality is he's brought that to the university ten fold. People talk about Ferentz, how much money has he brought to the u of I?
So if we lose him because of unwillingness to compensate him at market value determined by what people are willing to pay, I expect you, and stormin to be here arguing it's ok to go back to McDermott era quality, because it's affordable.
Then when he leaves, you should be on here defending that stance.
You act like Iowa State is in a stronger bargaining position than Hoiberg. The extension signed last summer said one thing to everyone. First, Fred is not looking at moving on to another college job, unless it's perfect (Kentucky, unc, duke, etc), and even then it is extremely unlikely he'd leave. Second, his agent is making sure that the nba knows he will talk to them.
He's already turned down overtures from the nba. And that's before this run, his phone will ring and ring this off season.
Then you have to account for all of the positive publicity he's brought to the university. Part of it is helping his bargaining position, but how much Iowa State merchandise, how many inquiries to the university from high school kids all over the country, how many new fans has he brought to Iowa State???
You see dollars in a contract, the reality is he's brought that to the university ten fold. People talk about Ferentz, how much money has he brought to the u of I?
So if we lose him because of unwillingness to compensate him at market value determined by what people are willing to pay, I expect you, and stormin to be here arguing it's ok to go back to McDermott era quality, because it's affordable.
Does Fred even want to coach in the NBA? Lets not forget he left the NBA to coach at ISU and build this program. This is his baby, at a place and school he loves. You don't seek out this situation just to use it as a resume builder. The NBA season is a 8 month grind. The college season is half that, without the long road trips. He can coach for ISU as long as he wants, most NBA coaches don't last long at a job no matter how much previous success they have had.
Considering the small buyout if Fred takes an NBA job, perhaps. Fred had never been a Head Coach when he left the NBA. In fact, ISU took a leap of faith in giving an untested Fred Hoiberg, who had zero coaching experience, the Head Coaching job at a Big 12 school.
ISU is an ideal fit for Fred. And Fred is an ideal fit for ISU. It works both ways. Fred knows that. I actually can see Fred staying at ISU for a very long time. I can see him being successful. And making even more money........over time.
If he wanted to coach in the NBA he could have been sitting on a bench at anytime. He is respected in the NBA. IMO if his goal was to coach in the NBA, you don't seek out the ISU job. You help find someone to take the job that is a fit long term.