Beginning to transition to a smart home

We recently just bought a new house and we need a few things like a doorbell, possibly a security system and cameras. I figure since neither one of us has more than an echo dot, it's a good time to figure out what path we want to go down. I've looked at Nest and Ring but I'm just wondering what some of the experts think is the right direction to go here. Like I said, we have just about nothing invested so we are a blank slate.

Upper deck Camping World

I just called and asked about when they are going to open the upper deck for ticket sales.

They said not until the lower bowl is sold out.

I told her that fans would rather sit in upper deck than endzone. Maybe more of us need to call and get them to realize this. I am one, for sure, that doesn't want to drive 20 hrs one way, just to sit in the endzone. Especially since I am still on fence for going.

An interesting Iowa State vs. Notre Dame analysis

The following was submitted to me from a guy I have known from the Cyclone interwebs for years. He goes by Cygarin over on Paul Clark's board. I really enjoy his analysis. He said it'd be ok if I shared with you all. Enjoy.

Below you will find a comparison of performance between Iowa State and Notre Dame, broken down into opponent strength ranges.

Make note.....

All opponent’s power rankings have been adjusted for home field advantage.

The over/under performance of each game has been normalized by considering both Iowa State and Notre Dame as having an exactly equal power rating. Thus, all performances can be equally compared.



TOP 15 EQUIVALENTS


95.81 @ OKLAHOMA LOSS +18 POINT OVER PERFORMANCE
95.71 @ GEORGIA LOSS +12
92.84 @ MICHIGAN LOSS -16
88.25 @ BAYLOR LOSS +10

Summary:

Win-Loss....

Neither team had any success, and thus neither team showed an advantage.

Margin....

Iowa State clearly had advantage having two double-digit over performances.

Notre Dame suffered a double digit underperformance to Michigan mid-season.


TOP 16-30 EQUIVALENTS

84.20 @ KANSAS STATE LOSS -2
81.29 H TEXAS WIN +7
80.28 H IOWA LOSS +3
79.32 H OKLAHOMA STATE LOSS -4
78.11 H USC WIN +3
78.06 @ TEXAS TECH WIN +12

Summary:

Win-Loss...

Arguably advantage Iowa State by virtue of having two wins in this range to Notre Dame's just one.

Arguably advantage Notre Dame by virtue that Iowa State has three losses to Notre Dame's none.

Overall I would call this one slight advantage Iowa State due to Texas being a higher ranked win, and also that Iowa State beat Texas Tech on the road.

Margin....

A wash of sorts.

In one game, Notre Dame had a 3-point over performance.

Iowa State "averaged" a 3.2 over performance.

Almost impossible to discern is what Notre Dame would have done with more games in this range, but all indicators suggests that 50-50 success would be highly probable.

TOP 31-45 EQUIVALENTS


77.05 H VIRGINIA TECH WIN +1
76.52 H TCU WIN +25
75.23 H NAVY WIN +29
75.22 @ WEST VIRGINIA WIN +23

Summary:

Win-loss....

Tie

Margin.....

Slight advantage Iowa State by virtue of having two 20-plus over performances.

Notre Dame had one 20-plus over performance ,but also had just a 1-pointer


TOP 45-55 EQUIVALENTS


73.49 @ STANFORD WIN +17
73.45 H VIRGINIA WIN +11
73.03 @ DUKE WIN +26

Summary: None.....Iowa State played no games in this range.

TOP 55-75 EQUIVALENTS

70.06 @ LOUISVILLE WIN +10
67.80 H BOSTON COLLEGE WIN +23

Summary: None…..Iowa State played no games in this range.


SUB-75 EQUIVALENTS


60.40 H KANSAS WIN -6
55.31 H NORTHERN IOWA WIN -21
55.03 H ULM WIN +31
54.22 H NEW MEXICO WIN +28
42.73 H BOWLING GREEN WIN +17

Summary:

Win-Loss: Tie- all games were won

Margin: Huge advantage Notre Dame, but largely irrelevant.


GRAND SUMMARY:


What is most notable is that Notre Dame payed only three opponents in the 16th to 45th range....and all three of these were played at home.

This is a VERY small sample to assess Notre Dame’s performance against credible opponents outside the top-15, and the home advantage arguably skews things a bit...at least from the standpoint of not knowing how Notre Dame can do on the road.

Conversely, where Notre Dame played only three... Iowa State played seven opponents in this mid-range....giving ample data, and showing that Iowa State has been heavily battle tested in this range.

It does appear that Notre Dame fared better at home than on the road, but lack of data makes it difficult to validate that premise.

The only range where Notre Dame has a performance advantage over Iowa State is in the sub-75 equivalent range...where Notre Dame smoked all of their opponents, and Iowa State struggled. Both teams won all their games, and so far as the bowl goes, the data in this range is irrelevant.

Iowa State had by far the more difficult "upper half" and "last half" strength of schedule, and is difficult to say what impact season fatigue played on the season-long performance, when compared to Notre Dame's.

Indeed, the only time all season that Notre Dame played back-to-back top-30 opponents was USC followed by Michigan....which resulted in a royal arse-kicking by the Wolverines.

To compare....Iowa State had only one three-game stretch where they did not play a top-30 team.

More critically in Iowa State's last six games....the Cyclones played only one team not top-25.

Whereby Notre Dame played not single team top-30 in their last five games after Michigan, and that one was a relatively lightweight 30th ranked Navy at home.....a 45th ranked equivalent.

To conclude......

All indications are that this 10-2 team and 7-5 team are equals regardless of the record disparity.

The data not only shows that Notre Dame's ten-win season was biased by the schedule....it was a direct product of the schedule.

At worst, as can be clearly seen......both teams are pretty much equal in all performance categories in the top-45 ranges.

If anything, the data suggests that Iowa State has been the better performer based on margin performance, even in their losses.

Star Trek Universe Thread

https://screenrant.com/star-trek-2-new-films-confirmed-official/

After seeing this latest article where the newly merged ViacomCBS CEO stated there are currently 2 new Star Trek movies in development, combined with the major ramp-up of Star Trek shows on the CBS Streaming app, I figured it was high time for Star Trek to finally get its own ongoing thread for any fans like myself out there.

With that said, it really seems like things are looking super bright for Star Trek fans right now with the biggest brightest of which being the merger of CBS and Viacom. That merger finally effectively solidifies the decently long separated TV and movie rights of Star Trek under one roof, meaning there can be much better fluidity and continuity between the two. This is what I've been wanting for a long time and has been the biggest hindrance in my eyes to Star Trek truly thriving in the modern media landscape. Marvel and Star Wars are currently paving the way as to what the new high-budget shared universe concept can look like, and I think Star Trek can thrive itself in its own way under the same landscape.

Everyone, feel free to jump in with your thoughts on anything Star Trek related. Hopefully the Star Trek world keeps expanding and thriving, which would likely mean this thread could really thrive too. I've got lots of thoughts myself on Discovery, Picard, what I think these two new movies are..... etc, but I'll save that stuff for later posts.

Signing Day Prepper

Alright guys! One of my favorite days of the year is coming up: SIGNING DAY!

Here's a little information on the guys currently committed as of Sunday evening. I have included some information and analysis so you guys can understand "who" we are getting instead of random names that you will here about in camp in a year or two. I am releasing the offense tonight and the defense and SP tomorrow. Please note: We may see some commitment flips, guys holding on signing or other weird stuff happening between Wednesday and Friday. I don't see any likely, but who knows.

If there is any other information you would like me to provide for the recruits (40 times, where they are from, their best offers, etc.), I would be glad to. Just comment below and I'll provide it.

QUARTER BACK

Name:
Aidan Bouman
Height & Weight: 6'-5.5" 200lbs
Star Rating: 4 star on ESPN, 3 star on Rivals and 247
Play Style: Pocket Passer
Player Comparison: Joe Flacco
Early Enrollee: Yes
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS So
Strengths: Arm Strength, Pocker Presence, Vision
Areas of Improvement: Scramble Ability, Speed/Strength
Verdict: It seems like Aidan doesn't get as much attention as the guy below on the list, but I think we are getting a solid player with Bouman. You can tell that his father/coach is an NFL QB; he just looks like a NFL QB when he plays. He'll need to work on tuning up his accuracy, but it's not an issue as of now.

Name:
Hunter Dekkers
Height & Weight: 6'-2.5" 225 lbs
Star Rating: 4 star
Play Style: Dual Threat Bulldozer
Player Comparison: Tim Tebow
Early Enrollee: No
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS So
Strengths: Arm Strength, Scramble Ability, Strength/Speed, Leadership
Areas of Improvement: Accuracy
Verdict: Dude is a gamer. Out of the player comps, I think this is the closest. Both left handed. Both the same size. Both will plow you over. Both will control the game. Dekkers has an absolute CANNON for an arm (go look up some twitter videos, they are nuts). He will need to work on his accuracy, but I think the college coaches will do wonders for his accuracy that 1A ball couldn't teach him. Mark my words, if he wins the job after Purdy goes pro, he will be a legend quickly. If he doesn't win the job. I see him moving to tight end.

RUNNING BACK

None committed. If we have attrition this offseason, I can see the staff going after a HS guy and/or a transfer. If no attrition, I doubt they go after a HS guy.

WIDE RECEIVER

Name: Aidan Bitter
Height & Weight: 6'-3" 175 lbs
Star Rating: 3 Star
Play Style: Possesion
Player Comparison: Keenan Allen
Early Enrollee: No
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS JR
Strengths: Route Running, Catching, Height
Areas of Improvement: Off the line quickness, Run after catch ability
Verdict: Another unsung hero of the class. He's not flashy, in fact, he's the opposite of Hakeem Butler. He's not going to outrun speedy DBs and probably won't have those crazy jukes and moves after the catch. He will be WIDE open a lot though. He has some of the best routes I've seen in an Iowa State recruit in a while.

Name: Xavier Hutchinson (JUCO)
Height & Weight: 6'-3" 190 lbs
Star Rating: 3 star

Play Style: Deep Threat
Player Comparison: Darren Wilson (ISU)
Early Enrollee: Yes
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS Jr or Jr year
Strengths: Speed, Height, Hands
Areas of Improvement: Separation
Verdict: Xavier is a clone of Darren Wilson. VERY fast and a tall receiver who will stretch the field. He has difficulty separating from corner backs, but that could be attributed to his JUCO having him frequently running go-routes. This guy is gonna be a beast.

Name: Daniel Jackson
Height & Weight: 6'-1" 209 lbs
Star Rating: 3 star
Play Style: Physical X
Player Comparison: Dez Bryant
Early Enrollee: No
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS SO
Strengths: Run After Catch, Physicality, Clutch
Areas of Improvement:Separation in routes
Verdict: It's obvious why USC wanted him. He's a physical receiver that will win contest passer and truck/stiff arm players in the open field. He looks to make a great pro prospect in the future


TIGHT ENDS

None. Unknown if staff is recruiting for this class.

OFFENSIVE LINE

(I am not going to give my verdict or player comps because I stink at evaluating O-Line)

Name: Tyler Miller
Height & Weight: 6'-9" 285 lbs
Star Rating: 3 star
Play Style: Balanced Run/Pass
Early Enrollee: Yes
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS So
Strengths: Size, Pass Protection
Areas of Improvement: Hips
Projected Position: LT (RT for Dekkers and Bouman)

Name: Hayden Pauls
Height & Weight: 6'-4"270 lbs
Star Rating: 3 star
Play Style: Balanced Pass/Run
Early Enrollee: yes
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS So
Strengths:Technique, Hips
Areas of Improvement: Strength, weight
Projected Position: RG


Name: Sam Rengert
Height & Weight: 6'-7" 290 lbs
Star Rating: 3 star
Play Style: Big Mauler
Early Enrollee: No
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS So
Strengths: MEAN DUDE, Pancakes
Areas of Improvement: Pass Pro
Projected Position: RT (Left for Dekkers and Bouman)


Name: Brady Petersen
Height & Weight: 6'-5" 275 lbs
Star Rating: 3 star
Play Style: Run Heavy
Early Enrollee: No
When He Could See Significant Playing Time: RS Jr
Strengths: Run Blocking, Technique
Areas of Improvement: Hips
Projected Position: LG



wood flooring. underlayment or no?

remodeling my 1930's home
tore up flooring to relevel the floors. Doubled up the joists as well.
the room is upstairs and i put soundproofing insulation (johns manville rockwool) in the 2x6 floor joists to help reduce sound transfering to main floor.

is there any reason to add underlayment before reinstalling the original heart pine? or just lay the flooring directly onto the brand new 3/4" subfloor? I don't see any reason for a vapor barrier as it is on second floor and the soundproofing insulation should do way more than an underlayment.

am i missing anything here?

CW Bowl watch in Ames?

OK, I have family commitment that day in north Iowa later in the afternoon. I can't stay home and watch the entire game and make the commitment. I would rather not drive the entire way before the game, which means I have to stop part way to watch the game. What better than watch it in Ames!

Are there any recommendations to watch the game in Ames? I figured Wallaby's maybe, or Jethro's. Are any places hosting a watch party?

  • Poll Poll
Poll: 2019 Big XII Bowl Predictions

Wuich Big XII teams will win their bowl game?

  • OSU vs ATM

    Votes: 63 47.4%
  • ISU vs ND

    Votes: 76 57.1%
  • OU vs LSU

    Votes: 16 12.0%
  • KSU vs Navy

    Votes: 89 66.9%
  • UT vs Utah

    Votes: 37 27.8%
  • BU vs UGA

    Votes: 40 30.1%
  • None of the above / Big XII will go 0-6

    Votes: 13 9.8%

Here is the Big XIIs 2019 bowl schedule:
https://www.espn.com/college-football/scoreboard/_/group/4/year/2019/seasontype/3/week/1

Believe it or not, the oddsmaker have the Big XII going 0-6 in the 2019 bowl season. Do you buy that?

How do you see this playing out?

OU is the biggest underdog, but are they this bowl seasons David Vs Goliath story? Or does that go to the ISU fanbase versus the national tradition of Notre Dame?

Note; The poll is public, and closes prior to the first game, OSU vs ATM on Friday, Dec 27.

Sunday forced ranking Only because it's cathartic - 12/15

Basis: What have you shown me so far.

1. Baylor - beat Butler, Arizona and Villanova after early loss to UW
2. Ku - no big wins after early loss to Duke
3. TxT - takes down Louisville
4. WVU - beats Wichita but loses to St. John's
5. Texas - lots of wins over nobodies with a loss to Georgetown
6. ISU - win over The Hall negated by a loss to hurky
7. oSu - two-game losing streak: Georgetown and Wichita
8. OU - loses to Stanford and yesterday to Wichita
9. TCU - Jamie should have taken the UCLA job
10. K-State - barely treading water - Beat Navy!

Filter