Westworld

Tied to a horse, naked and released at what William referred to as the edge of the park. My take was this would be outside of park surveillance/security and management and he would die out there without rescue. It was pretty clear to me William was killing him and taking the company over per their conversation.

I thought he was dead initially, but that makes no sense that someone could just wonder out of the park and just disappear. They would have that place monitored every which way. I'm of the opinion he was just humiliating him, leaving him tied up and naked to be picked up by security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bos
I thought he was dead initially, but that makes no sense that someone could just wonder out of the park and just disappear. They would have that place monitored every which way. I'm of the opinion he was just humiliating him, leaving him tied up and naked to be picked up by security.


Kind of how I feel about it too. We may see him yet.
 
An after-show interview with the producer and they said nobody is really gone. When asked about Ford, they only said his sacrifice was real.


Well yeah, hes in the new Bay-Transformers movie. Robots to robots. ;)
 
After talking to my wife and some of my co-workers I think I am the only person with this opinion, but I didn't think the show was that good. Just reminded me of an M Knight Shyamalan movie where people are confusing good writing for Plot Twists
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclones_R_GR8
After talking to my wife and some of my co-workers I think I am the only person with this opinion, but I didn't think the show was that good. Just reminded me of an M Knight Shyamalan movie where people are confusing good writing for Plot Twists


We should put you all on an island. There is no room for you here.



;)
 
After talking to my wife and some of my co-workers I think I am the only person with this opinion, but I didn't think the show was that good. Just reminded me of an M Knight Shyamalan movie where people are confusing good writing for Plot Twists

The difference being, even if you think it is just plot twists, is that it is supported by some really good acting. A nice change from all of the wooden comic book acting in the usual network cop and drama tripe.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: bos and srjclone
Oh dear lord, I enjoyed the show. Loved it. I have no problem suspending disbelief and being entertained. That doesn't mean I turn my brain off afterward, though. It's possible to both enjoy something and recognize its boundaries.

Your logic is so intellectually dishonest. Your example of Santa is perfect evidence. You love Santa. Great, me too. It's magical to see my kids talk about him, and see how much joy it brings. I love my memories of being a child and experiencing it. I love every bit of it. But, that doesn't mean that I have to ignore the implausibility of it. That doesn't take anything away from it. I think it actually enhances it. And if it did take away, that would only be a measure of the smallness of one's own mind. Thank goodness I don't have that problem.

C8CCK8jr1w1Y4.gif

I've never been accused of being a deep thinker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bos and Mr Janny
The difference being, even if you think it is just plot twists, is that it is supported by some really good acting. A nice change from all of the wooden comic book acting in the usual network cop and drama tripe.

I can't tell good acting from bad (lucky for YOU Costner) but I do appreciate a character growing throughout the season. And for a bunch of pre-programmed robots, there was BUTTLOADS of growth for almost every character. In fact, the only characters that didn't seem to grow were the humans but I think the writers had that as a goal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bos
I can't tell good acting from bad (lucky for YOU Costner) but I do appreciate a character growing throughout the season. And for a bunch of pre-programmed robots, there was BUTTLOADS of growth for almost every character. In fact, the only characters that didn't seem to grow were the humans but I think the writers had that as a goal.
Agreed. The show goes out of its way to show humanity in a terrible light. The staff are mostly all corrupt, unethical, and scheming. The human guests, outside of a few, are depicted as bumbling tourists. That's not a coincidence. It's basically the whole point.
 
Thandie and Rachel were spectacular in this.

Really loved Theresa and Elsie as well.

Great time for female actors especially considering the subject matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Angie
I think the acting is good, and I enjoy the show, but some of the groundhog day, repeated looping got a bit tiresome for me.

Also - I think it would have been cool to see some of the current "real" world, and also had a few more guest storylines.

I found the singular message, "humans bad, hosts good" to be a bit too simple.

I'm not trying to be critical, just things I think would have made it more interesting.

If it was possible to create such "real" people and animals, think of the money some would spend to have a family member, friend, or pet that passed like Hopkins did for his old family. I think there would be way more money in that, then creating a "park."
 
I think the acting is good, and I enjoy the show, but some of the groundhog day, repeated looping got a bit tiresome for me.

Also - I think it would have been cool to see some of the current "real" world, and also had a few more guest storylines.

I found the singular message, "humans bad, hosts good" to be a bit too simple.

I'm not trying to be critical, just things I think would have made it more interesting.

If it was possible to create such "real" people and animals, think of the money some would spend to have a family member, friend, or pet that passed like Hopkins did for his old family. I think there would be way more money in that, then creating a "park."
Me thinks we will see this more in Season 2
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Angie
I think the acting is good, and I enjoy the show, but some of the groundhog day, repeated looping got a bit tiresome for me.

Also - I think it would have been cool to see some of the current "real" world, and also had a few more guest storylines.

I found the singular message, "humans bad, hosts good" to be a bit too simple.

I'm not trying to be critical, just things I think would have made it more interesting.

If it was possible to create such "real" people and animals, think of the money some would spend to have a family member, friend, or pet that passed like Hopkins did for his old family. I think there would be way more money in that, then creating a "park."

I think that was on purpose to show how it affected the hosts. Ford (I think it was him) even said that the majority of the hosts ended up going insane because of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoxsterCy and Angie



Thought this was good.

Yeah, that was good. And his other video about timelines was good, too. Really puts a bow on the whole thing. I'm looking forward to going back through and watching again to see how much foreshadowing I can pick up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bos
I thought he was dead initially, but that makes no sense that someone could just wonder out of the park and just disappear. They would have that place monitored every which way. I'm of the opinion he was just humiliating him, leaving him tied up and naked to be picked up by security.

This is pure spitballing, but might Logan be Wyatt? He's become a completely unhinged human leading hosts in a reign of terror in the fringes of the park.