The date cutoff is intentional since just a couple of years before Lafester went from scoring 2.8 to 22.5.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Umm,
Umm, Naz Long.
Also, how many players have played with 4 senior NBA prospects.
And the year before that Tom Schafer went from 4 to 18.The date cutoff is intentional since just a couple of years before Lafester went from scoring 2.8 to 22.5.
And the year before that Tom Schafer went from 4 to 18.
And two years before that Sam Hill went from 2.1 to 10.1
And a few years before that Ron Falenschek went from 3.0 to 10.5
I agree with this. Problem is, the kid is a poor shooter. He will play a role, I think he may start, but he has limited offensive skills.Nick is handy to have around. He has shown he can fill in at spots 1-4. That's pretty valuable with a short roster and fouls/injuries.
Carefully choosing a time frame of since 1990 so that no player has hit those parameters is misleading since I found 4 players in a very cursory search of the decade before.There is a difference between possible and likely. If it happens, we will benefit greatly.
Carefully choosing a time frame of since 1990 so that no player has hit those parameters is misleading since I found 4 players in a very cursory search of the decade before.
I guess I don't remember every post in this thread, but I find it highly unlikely that anyone suggested that all players make that kind of jump.You found examples, it is possible. Not all players make that kind of jump.
I'm sure that stat will change. Heck you have already changed it because he wasn't 4 of 16.I just think 4/16 at the 3 will make it difficult to do better than 8ppg unless that stat changes.
The number of players that have scored 4.0 ppg or less to the number of players who scored 10 ppg since 1990 in the ISU program totals zero. I might have missed one but that big of a jump is huge.
It seems like this offseason a good majority of our fan base (and a lot of posters who I respect) have an inferiority complex with Babb and I'm curious to hear why... and it's not just because "Prohm said he had the most NBA potential." Early last season Naz was shooting TERRIBLE and a good lot of you were calling for Babb to start over him. To me his biggest problem was finishing whilst moving at the speed of light... ALWAYS missed hard off the glass. He can get by anyone at will, doesn't make silly mistakes, plays great D and can play/guard 1-4 if needed. IMO the development of his shot will have the biggest impact on the success of our season. Wigginton isn't a great shooter yet, I don't have confidence in DJ to run an offense or finish in the lane. I do with Babb. For this season I have visions of Babb, LW and the occasional Lard running a blazing fast break with a trailing DJ, Lewis and maybe even Solomon for 3. So I guess the question is: Why do the greatest fan in the country **** on him and why does everyone condone it?
I'm sure that stat will change. Heck you have already changed it because he wasn't 4 of 16.
He was 8 of 26. I don't think he will be a career .300 shooter. He finished the season (February and March) hitting at a .500 clip (4-8). I don't think he is a .500 shooter either.
I agree with this. Problem is, the kid is a poor shooter. He will play a role, I think he may start, but he has limited offensive skills.
I didn't read the OP, but if Nick can lead us to two straight national titles, I'd put my name on a petition to rename Sukup Basketball Complex to the Nick Babb Complex.
It's catchy
45% overall and 30% from 3 is nowhere near poor. Not incredible, but not poor.