The Nick Babb Complex

Babb brings experience. He will get his playing time because he should bring maturity to a very young team. We are going to need him to be improved over last year for us to do well. We need him to score more. We are all excited about Wigginton, Lewis, and Lard. They all appear to be great talents, but still they are only freshmen. We have had a lot of really good players over the years, but rarely have they been impact players as freshmen. There have been some, but having three in one year would be really special. I think they are going to have their ups and downs, so we are going to need some constants too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thefullmonte
The number of players that have scored 4.0 ppg or less to the number of players who scored 10 ppg since 1990 in the ISU program totals zero. I might have missed one but that big of a jump is huge.
I don't know exactly how many were 4 to 10 but there several even recently that have made big jumps in production.
 
One big factor will be just how much he ends up having the ball in his hands. I could see him playing "PG" like Naz did at times last year when Monte would run off screens to the wing or baseline and either try to make a play or a lot of times run PnR with Solomon. I expect a lot of those types of plays being run for Jackson and Wigginton next year. Babb seems to be the logical guy to set those up. That might mean looking at his rebounding and assist numbers would be a better indicator of his contributions. Averaging 5-6 rebounds might be a bigger deal than scoring double figures.
 
Carefully choosing a time frame of since 1990 so that no player has hit those parameters is misleading since I found 4 players in a very cursory search of the decade before.

Ok. So 4 in basically 40 years. Count me as assuming it's pretty unlikely.
 
Babb reminds me a lot of Diante. I don't think he ever really turns into a great scorer, but he can be a solid starter. I see Babb playing a lot of the point next year with Wigginton and Jackson playing off the ball. I think that plays to each of their skill sets.
 
He was a new roll player on an established veteran team. He never had a chance to score a bunch of points. It's normal for a sophomore to "look bad" with limited minutes then look better with more experience and playing time.

You also don't have to be a good shooter to score. But it's easier to become a good shooter when you get enough shots to find your groove.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ajg515
Not sure this is a great analogy and it will probably get criticized but I'll give it a go.

NWB is like Joel Lanning, hasn't shown to be an elite player but can get the job done at the Big 12 level with the right pieces around him. Luckily for NWB, we have a lot better pieces around him than Lanning had. In usual CF(all sports fan) fashion, the backup QB is always a better option. Everyone is anointing Lewis as our Jacob Park.


Interesting comparison to Lanning. I would add that both have had their best moments when it wasn't really expected. It just happened.
 
He was a new roll player on an established veteran team. He never had a chance to score a bunch of points. It's normal for a sophomore to "look bad" with limited minutes then look better with more experience and playing time.

You also don't have to be a good shooter to score. But it's easier to become a good shooter when you get enough shots to find your groove.

I swear he's good at getting to the rim with the ball...gets a few more finishes and it's another legit threat.

Not sure what Prohm sees as that much NBA potential but I NWB's a player I'm excited to see play.
 
See Thompson's compilation video from Sunday for a nice glimpse at NWB, especially the powerful move that he makes to tie the game with 12 seconds left. Outstanding.
 
Babb is a really good role player because he can rebound, pass and defend but unless he starts shooting better I see him more as a good bench guy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyTwins