saturdays referees

FYI, Below are the fouls called per team in games against ranked opponents.

K-State 24, I-State 23
Baylor 13, I-State 12
Kansas 20, I-State 14
Texas 20, I-State 18
Duke 19, I-State 17
Cal 17, I-State 14
UNI 14, I-State 14

And consider that in several of these games, the Cyclones were fouling late to stop the clock and they still were called for less fouls. The officials have had little to no impact on anything IMO.

good research but number of fouls called in a game is a worthless statistic. Not all fouls are created equal. Just because more fouls are called on team x doesn't mean that they didn't get the benefit of more calls throughout the game.

Referees usually keep pretty good track of the number of fouls and in most games the fouls end up being close to even (except for when the team is fouling late to stay in it).

I am not saying we're getting screwed by the refs. I thought the way the refs called the KSU game benefited them, but it wasn't the difference in the game. Officiating in general has become awful because they have allowed the style of play to get too physical.
 
I like when the KSU player slid across the length of the paint with the ball and out of bounds, then called a timeout.
I agree, the refs were really bad. There was one who continued to call fouls when he was clearly out of position and the ref nearest it didn't.
This is the one that came to mind for me
 
Exactly. This is one of the main things wrong with college officials. They are told to "even up" the fouls because it makes it hard to complain to the league commissioner afterwards. As stated, this screws over teams who try to play clean and actually helps those who naturally foul quite a bit.

I can't believe how many refs even in JH/HS have tried to do this in games I officiate. I never care who has what number of fouls, it's not like I purposefully am passing on things to call. If your team is dumb enough to be hacking all game then that's your problem...I have yet to see in the rules book where both teams are supposed to magically have the same # of fouls called on them.

Really? And how do you know this? Are you a big 12 official? Or are you just making random assumptions because you officiate JH games? :eek:
 
I like when the KSU player slid across the length of the paint with the ball and out of bounds, then called a timeout.
I agree, the refs were really bad. There was one who continued to call fouls when he was clearly out of position and the ref nearest it didn't.

Do you actually know what the primary coverage areas even are? Or what each official should be looking at when the ball goes into the post or when someone comes slashing through the lane? Probably not....
 
  • Like
Reactions: clones_jer
I watched 10 minutes of the Magic/Hornets game last night... and saw three traveling calls.

but don't let facts get in the way.

You know what's amazing? I was just over on a Hornet's message board and they were complaining about how bad the refs were in their game because of all of the traveling being called. Strange.
 
I justed hated that whenever a foul was called on KSU, we would drain a 3 or something similar. I am liking the way hockey does penalties more and more and more these days.
 
Oh, and for the third time in my life, I can remember seeing a ******* double foul called. All 3 against Iowa State now. Officials that call that are complete morons.

I asked about this...It's actually the correct and accurate call.

If two refs have different calls, they meet, call the double foul and it's a jump ball.
 
I asked about this...It's actually the correct and accurate call.

If two refs have different calls, they meet, call the double foul and it's a jump ball.
Except didn't the same ref (baseline) make both calls?
 
Except didn't the same ref (baseline) make both calls?


I really don't see anything wrong with the double foul from a rule stand point...Where it hurts ISU is with number of players available of who gets the foul. Opponent gets a foul, no big deal, go to the bench. Brackins gets a foul, damn it, we are in serious trouble.
 
I asked about this...It's actually the correct and accurate call.

If two refs have different calls, they meet, call the double foul and it's a jump ball.

I believe its point of interruption, not jump. But I'm not up to date on NCAA.
 
Nope...Jump, in the case of two refs who see and call different things. Charge vs block is most common.

You are absolutely wrong. A double foul is a point of interruption. The ONLY time it is a jump ball if there is no team control.

You can never have a double foul and have one call be a charge and the other be a block. In a case where you have simultaneous fouls (a foul from two officials at different spots on the floor), which is not a double foul, you still have point of interruption.

Knowing the rules helps a lot .
 
It seemed as if some of the fouls called on KSU took most of our momentum away which is what ****** me off the most. there were several but two distinctively stand out.

1. Colvin's dish to CB, which the defender got called for blocking. I don't think i'm the only one who didn't hear the whistle.

2. MG's 3/4 court pass to one of our guards that resulted in an away from the ball foul on KSU.
 
It seemed as if some of the fouls called on KSU took most of our momentum away which is what ****** me off the most. there were several but two distinctively stand out.

1. Colvin's dish to CB, which the defender got called for blocking. I don't think i'm the only one who didn't hear the whistle.

2. MG's 3/4 court pass to one of our guards that resulted in an away from the ball foul on KSU.

The announcers said the place was so loud that nobody heard the whistle. I remember games like that in Hilton were you couldn't hear the whistle because the place was going crazy. Hard to blame the official on that one.
 
You are absolutely wrong. A double foul is a point of interruption. The ONLY time it is a jump ball if there is no team control.

You can never have a double foul and have one call be a charge and the other be a block. In a case where you have simultaneous fouls (a foul from two officials at different spots on the floor), which is not a double foul, you still have point of interruption.

Knowing the rules helps a lot .

Its still a double foul. Simultaneous fouls would be two fouls at the same instant on differing players (i.e. A1 fouls B1 at the same instant as B2 fouls A2)

As the block and charge were called on the only two players involved it would ba a double foul.
 
You are absolutely wrong. A double foul is a point of interruption. The ONLY time it is a jump ball if there is no team control.

You can never have a double foul and have one call be a charge and the other be a block. In a case where you have simultaneous fouls (a foul from two officials at different spots on the floor), which is not a double foul, you still have point of interruption.

Knowing the rules helps a lot .

What is your problem? Not everyone on here has a referee handbook, they are merely stating that a double foul doesnt happen often and when it does it kind of catches ppl of guard because they do not understand what it is. You dont have to be a ****** about it, who are you to belittle someone.
 
Its still a double foul. Simultaneous fouls would be two fouls at the same instant on differing players (i.e. A1 fouls B1 at the same instant as B2 fouls A2)

As the block and charge were called on the only two players involved it would ba a double foul.

You can't have a double foul and one be a charge and one be a block. It's one or the other. If you do have different calls, one official is going to overrule the other official and make the call.

A double foul is intended for contact that is happening away from the ball (mainly post play, don't think I have ever seen it anywhere else).
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron