I bet the exterior. A section of the parking lot will be closed and they won't have that entrance open.
Release: SCHEMATIC DESIGNS FOR SOUTH END ZONE PROJECT RELEASED
- Thread starter ChrisMWilliams
- Start date
I bet the exterior. A section of the parking lot will be closed and they won't have that entrance open.
I like my .bmp I did in paint a while back and it got deleted from this site. :smile: It was the same idea but better quality I thought. The actual stadium should be great.
As a person who currently sits in the SEZ, I am really excited about this!! Now my next question is how much are the rest of the seats going to cost?? I'm probably not going to get the $750 club seats.
I didn't think they would outdo the renderings from 5+ years ago. I thought that plan was perfect.
I was wrong.
What they plan on building is legitimately bad ***.
I was wrong.
What they plan on building is legitimately bad ***.
They're adding a bunch of seating...i'd have to look at the numbers but that seems like to much work right now...but doubt they'll be "losing" any of the current end zone seats. You might be off in the corner though instead of straight on. Anyone have numbers on current End zone seats?
I like it!!!! Well done!! It's going to be pretty intimidating going into that SEZ! Nicely done JP!
Looks good, will add a lot to the current stadium and look great coming in on University. Will be interesting to see what the green space, parking , and possible/rumored tunnel/bridge will look like together with the stadium addition now. I'm guessing those plans (green space, parking, etc.) will be completed this fall so they can bid late fall and start construction right away in the spring (march/april).
Last edited:
"In addition to the new club section, there will be more permanent seat location options and price points for fan consideration."
Wonder where the seats will be for those of us with price points of the current $175 for the endzone?
Wonder where the seats will be for those of us with price points of the current $175 for the endzone?
More awkward is telling all of us about it too. Do like the rest of us do, untuck your shirt, don't say anything and think about Kathy Bates in a bathing suit until you can take care of it in a private place.
Where did this tunnel/bridge stuff come from? Is that an AD statement?
I always thought that University (Elwood if you an old timer like me) is meant to act as a bit of a levy from Squaw creek - so a tunnel would be tough. And a bridge even more so.
Am I the only one disappointed in the design? I was really hoping for something that integrated better with the curved sideline portions of the stadium. The wedges of seating that form the transitions from the SEZ seating to the sidelines don't do it for me. I was expecting to see something more fluid and more similar to the schematic design that was released in '08. I understand the need for the club seating and the monster video board and they need to be worked in somehow also, but the overall package should be considered.
Now, don't get me wrong. I'm thrilled that the project is approved and moving forward. It has been years in the making, but I'm a bit disappointed in the design.
Now, don't get me wrong. I'm thrilled that the project is approved and moving forward. It has been years in the making, but I'm a bit disappointed in the design.
I'm not really sure what else could've been done to maximize the space for seating, while keeping the seating within a reasonable distance from the field (the whole curved sideline thing).
I'm not sure if these are what you're talking about or not
One thing I don't like about this is the angle on the lower corners. I remember this from a game I went to at Kinnick before their renovation (don't ask, don't ask).
I got a scalp ticket on in the endzone on those old crap bleachers they had. Back during the Fry era when they just jammed seats in there. And the seat - even though I was in the endzone corner - and my seat angle was as though I was on the side line. I literally was looking across the bleachers and watched the game with my head turned at a near 90 angle to see the field.
I think these designs provide a better sight line to the field.
And again - they're just renderings and the inside one leaves A LOT to be desired. It may look quite a bit different in the end.
Come on man. You joined the site four months ago and your first post is criticizing the SEZ renderings. At least say hello first before you start trolling.
