Big 10 plays on Friday nightsI'd say Fridays are annoying. High school football is big in Texas and many other states. Feel like it would always be terrible ratings. Leave Friday night for the fun belt and aac.
Big 10 plays on Friday nightsI'd say Fridays are annoying. High school football is big in Texas and many other states. Feel like it would always be terrible ratings. Leave Friday night for the fun belt and aac.
Friday night might be a niche for a Big 12 west "after dark" - it could start late enough that it wouldn't overlap with Midwest HS game attendance ... go to the game, return & watch a 10:30-ish kickoff. It'd be like the first game of the CFB weekend.I'd say Fridays are annoying. High school football is big in Texas and many other states. Feel like it would always be terrible ratings. Leave Friday night for the fun belt and aac.
No one is leaving the Big Ten due to the Big Ten Academic Alliance. No one is leaving ever.I don’t disagree, but if there was change like this; the cream of the B10 and SEC wouldn’t kick teams out, the would leave to join each other in new blueblood conference.
I don't think we'd play every Friday. The Big 12 would probably have one Friday night game and one Thursday night game every week. So we might play on both nights once a season.Friday night might be a niche for a Big 12 west "after dark" - it could start late enough that it wouldn't overlap with Midwest HS game attendance ... go to the game, return & watch a 10:30-ish kickoff. It'd be like the first game of the CFB weekend.
Doing it every week, I don't know about that.
agree however, when OSU wants more money... do they and a few others get it?No one is leaving the Big Ten due to the Big Ten Academic Alliance. No one is leaving ever.
That was a very interesting podcast! Thanks for sharing!!This podcast from the Athlon Sports guys is a must listen. Start at the 28:00 mark.
![]()
Athlon U: The College Football Podcast
Football Podcast · Updated Weekly · Athlon U: The College Football Podcast presented by Athlon Sport previews and reviews every aspect of the greatest sport on the planet. Join Athlon’s college football expert Steve Lassan and sports p…podcasts.apple.com
The TLDR version:
B1G is currently evaluating Oregon/WA/Stanford/Cal
If B1G passes, than we get those four + the corners.
If B1G takes them, we still get the corners.
He spoke pretty confidently that
1. There is no way/no how the PAC survives.
2. CBS may be willing to over pay for an expanded and rebranded Big 12 (they’re in danger of being shut out of the SEC/B1G).
He went on to surmise, after speaking with industry sources, that the new look Big 12 could be playing Thur/Fri/Sat after dark games.
He sounded pretty confident in all this, and that we’ll probably learn about the next expansion moves within about a month.
Best case scenario for ISU is obviously for the Big XII to be the #3 conference once the ACC gets stripped. Worst case would be to end up with the PAC and Big XII leftovers in the #4 conference.We’d have room for both all of those imo. The chance those are available and the Big 20 hadn’t lost schools is very unlikely, but we’d have room for 4 ACC schools even if Big 20.
One unwanted school, Cal in this example, should not stop getting 90% of what is wanted. The difference between Cal and whatever school Cal would force out is immaterial in the big picture.
It is not just killing the PAC, it is removing the chance ESPN kills the Big 12. A Big 16/18/20 all make nearly certain the Big 12 survives. You don’t pass on that because of Cal inclusion,.
The Pac sticking together increases the chance ESPN exploits the big 12 schools in the east and Houston to get Big 12 dissolution in helping their ACC dilemma. The bait and switch odds high, but with unequal revenue sharing, they could maybe appease FSU and Co, adding WVU, Houston, and Cincinnati, getting the rest of the Big 12 to blink- some to PAC and some to ACC. Likely leaving ISU and KSU out
Dave Wannstedt never knew anything and everyone said so when he said that other than KSU and ISU fans who wanted to believe it. Wannstedt is an idiot who was talking out of his ass.Remember last year when Mike Wanstatt was saying that KU and ISU will go to the BIG? How do any of these guys know anything?
No, and they won’t ask. The academic money is worth billions. They aren’t going to jeopardize that in any way for an extra $10M-$20M for sports when they are already one it the very highest revenue athletic departments in the country.agree however, when OSU wants more money... do they and a few others get it?
Is that Dave’s brother?Remember last year when Mike Wanstatt was saying that KU and ISU will go to the BIG? How do any of these guys know anything?
Change in conferences doesn’t change their academic grant money one bit at allNo, and they won’t ask. The academic money is worth billions. They aren’t going to jeopardize that in any way for an extra $10M-$20M for sports when they are already one it the very highest revenue athletic departments in the country.
I don’t see a scenario where Pitt gets picked up by the P2. NC St and VA Tech will likely be left behind. Louisville is somewhat interesting, but there might a reason the Big XII passed on them before.I have zero interest in any of what will be the available ACC schools.
They are kinda gross and not appealing.
Thinking the hookers?I don’t see a scenario where Pitt gets picked up by the P2. NC St and VA Tech will likely be left behind. Louisville is somewhat interesting, but there might a reason the Big XII passed on them before.