Yes, 4 of the last 7 years finished the season in top 25.
They have finished top 25 in football twice in the past 35 years....
Hmm, well, one of these is wrong.
Yes, 4 of the last 7 years finished the season in top 25.
They have finished top 25 in football twice in the past 35 years....
Well, there’s always that Washington State fan’s plan to merge conferences plus bring in both SDSU and SMU. That oughta do it, right?San Diego State hasn't been relevant since Marshall Faulk. My point is the Big 12 needs to go after name schools this time and not glorified city community colleges, **** it up this time it'll probably be the last chance.
Hmm, well, one of these is wrong.
Once again no facts just BS.San Diego State hasn't been relevant since Marshall Faulk. My point is the Big 12 needs to go after name schools this time and not glorified city community colleges, **** it up this time it'll probably be the last chance.
I’m not trying to hate on SDSU… I mean we are long-time ISU fans here, but I think our sights are better set on literally anybody in the PAC 12 or ACC (if it ever came to that). Even OSU and WSU would be better gets.Yes, 4 of the last 7 years finished the season in top 25.
Well to start, your facts are made up.Once again no facts just BS.
Name schools - what does Colorado bring? What do they really bring. Your only legit answer iis Denver and San Diego is 1.5 X larger.
The SDSU athletic program is definitely better.
Go get your name brand Blockbuster, Radio Shack and sears. I will take up and coming program for longevity any time. Isn’t that what iSU is striving to be? Consistent winner?
I really hope I'm wrong, but said all along that if I were any of the PAC schools, I'd hold tight for now. Guessing nothing happens until off season next year.
You got a coupon code or something?
Once again no facts just BS.
Name schools - what does Colorado bring? What do they really bring. Your only legit answer iis Denver and San Diego is 1.5 X larger.
The SDSU athletic program is definitely better.
Go get your name brand Blockbuster, Radio Shack and sears. I will take up and coming program for longevity any time. Isn’t that what iSU is striving to be? Consistent winner?
If I'm being honest my wife handles the finances. I'm along for the ride. how much is it?
How is the ACC not already there? Is this a timing issue for the B1G & SEC? Due to media contract the ACC is sticking together for a while until it gets raided?Anybody that ever thought we were going to be in the B1G was delusional, just like anybody that thinks the Big 12 should be fighting for anything more than 3rd place is smoking something. And those thinking we should add SDSU or the like at this stage is guaranteeing the ACC and Pac 12 will have a higher than nothing chance of taking that 3rd place from us, something we can’t afford.
Once again no facts just BS.
Name schools - what does Colorado bring? What do they really bring. Your only legit answer iis Denver and San Diego is 1.5 X larger.
The SDSU athletic program is definitely better.
Go get your name brand Blockbuster, Radio Shack and sears. I will take up and coming program for longevity any time. Isn’t that what iSU is striving to be? Consistent winner?
You got a coupon code or something?
This is stupid. The CF tradition is to pay cash in full. Only suckers pay in installments.Now the thread gets interesting.
ACC is third, but they are very vulnerable because of their unfavorable TV deal. They are locked in for like $30 million a team until 2035. If they try to renegotiate, then that would probably absolve their GOR deal and teams could bolt. If they don't renegotiate, then teams like Clemson, FSU, Miami and such will be looking to leave because teams in their own state will be making $80 million plus. They are in a really bad spot.How is the ACC not already there? Is this a timing issue for the B1G & SEC? Due to media contract the ACC is sticking together for a while until it gets raided?
ACC is third, but they are very vulnerable because of their unfavorable TV deal. They are locked in for like $30 million a team until 2035. If they try to renegotiate, then that would probably absolve their GOR deal and teams could bolt. If they don't renegotiate, then teams like Clemson, FSU, Miami and such will be looking to leave because teams in their own state will be making $80 million plus. They are in a really bad spot.
Totally agree.I think that house of cards falls apart as soon as Clemson and FSU (and maybe Miami) get the go-ahead from ESPN and the SEC. It's never been tried in court and many contract lawyers on the interweb seem to think it would easily fail that test. I have zero contract law knowledge but the arguments made seem very logical.
In my opinion, getting 4-6 from the Pac 12 would cement us the unquestionable 3rd conference. ACC couldn't add anybody to overcome that. The question remains how viable the Pac 12 thinks they can be by possibly keeping Oregon and Washington. I would debate heavily that teams would be better moving now than having slots fill up elsewhere, but I also don't know that the Big 12 expands without them.