Alert: PLEASE READ: Important site announcement

[peteypie]

My avatar is only a hotdog getting ketchup put on it and nothing more. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

 

[LindenCy]

Anyone remember excite and altavista?

Don't forget Webcrawler.

 

[SNEDDS3]

How is HN responding to this pictural crisis? Surely they are on the list too.

Wouldn't that mean someone would have to post over there?

 

[Wesley]

Does anyone else get the creeps from a billion-dollar company using the word "crotch"?

Hearing the word crotch, Michael Jackson Google videos come to mind.

 

[reaCY]

New law in Saudi Arabia bans alluring eyes.

http://m.indiatoday.in/story/new-saudi-law-bans-tempting-eyes-of-women/1/399382.html

This is the end of freedom!

 

[urb1]

Anyone remember excite and altavista?

Actually, altavista was very good for its time. Excite tried to be Yahoo but never made it. AskJeeves always sucked.

 

[urb1]

Does anyone else get the creeps from a billion-dollar company using the word "crotch"?

I get the creeps more thinking about how much Google knows about me.

 

[pourcyne]

Well, since people can ****** all types of obscenities on ******, and ****** willingly and deliberately shows you smutty stuff, this means that ****** cannot post ads on its own page. Ipso Fatso.

rolleyes:

 

[NorthCyd]

I'm pretty sure I've seen some ads on this site in the past that would fall under this very broad interpretation of mature content. Is google adds going to ban itself?

 

[Wesley]

I'm pretty sure I've seen some ads on this site in the past that would fall under this very broad interpretation of mature content. Is google adds going to ban itself?

How about those crotch snips?

 

[1100011CS]

So, the shirtless pictures of Georges seems to fall in this category? Or is Google sexist?

 

[GTO]

Actually, altavista was very good for its time. Excite tried to be Yahoo but never made it. AskJeeves always sucked.

Please. Netscape Navigator all the way.

 

[Rabbuk]

welp RIP cyclonefanatic. We had a good run.

 

[Farnsworth]

People make too big of a deal out of the requests to keep the site "family-friendly". It IS nice to be able to browse the forums at work without having to worry about someone seeing my screen at the wrong time and it's insanely easy to go see all that **** somewhere else.

That's why they need to install a Work Safe skin. This basically let's you browse without it displaying pictures or videos.

 

[Ciclone]

I'm pretty sure I've seen some ads on this site in the past that would fall under this very broad interpretation of mature content. Is google adds going to ban itself?

How else are we to acquire Russian brides?

 

[MNCyGuy]

Actually, altavista was very good for its time. Excite tried to be Yahoo but never made it. AskJeeves always sucked.

Hell, it's still the #1 search engine in Pawnee, IN.

 

[CLONECONES]

FYI, my experiences with using AdSense is they have something similar to a 3-strike rule when it comes to their TOS.

Once you get the violation email you've got one more shot before they cancel your account (and lock the Tax-ID so you can't just make a new one).

Be careful about it because once they're done with you, you're done and there is nothing that compares to the ease & PPC with adsense.

 

[Wesley]

Please. Netscape Navigator all the way.

Ah, the good old days. The intro was so pretty.

 

[Wesley]

FYI, my experiences with using AdSense is they have something similar to a 3-strike rule when it comes to their TOS.

Once you get the violation email you've got one more shot before they cancel your account (and lock the Tax-ID so you can't just make a new one).

Be careful about it because once they're done with you, you're done and there is nothing that compares to the ease & PPC with adsense.

What is this? A 90 day test to run clean? Does this mean you can get banished to the netherworld forever? Tough policy. They want to snip you off just like that. Tough sledding. Better make that one shot count.

 

[bluestarcyclone]

Yeah, I don't think any of them have actually been bad, but maybe google's video/pic recognition software(or whatever) knows those are straight out of the beginning of a pron video. :spinny: Or, so they seem...

That's the thing, while many know where the images may have originated from, ive kept all of them to ones that met the site guidelines. (theyre actually from a large collection of images made specifically for that purpose, and even then there's ones i havent used because they're a little over the line because the watermark might be offensive)