You could just not pay attention to it. So far they seemed to have done a good job with this one.I'm not an "it's a bust guy" I'm more of a "why are we trying to forecast so far out" guy.
You could just not pay attention to it. So far they seemed to have done a good job with this one.I'm not an "it's a bust guy" I'm more of a "why are we trying to forecast so far out" guy.
Maybe it's my not understanding what "enhanced", "moderate" and "high" risk means? 2 days ago the whole state was enhanced and moderate risk and you said that high risk wasn't a stretch.(Quiet voice) All along in this thread the local NWS has been pretty clear that it was going to be pretty iffy (conditional) in Iowa, regardless of what some of the sexy AI stuff was cranking out.
They forecast for a week all hell was going to break loose statewide today. Schools got dismissed early and all extracurricular activities were unnecessarily canceled because of the week long doom and gloom build-up.
Maybe it's my not understanding what "enhanced", "moderate" and "high" risk means? 2 days ago the whole state was enhanced and moderate risk and you said that high risk wasn't a stretch.
High risk doesn't mean that it is a certainty that a certain area will have severe weather.
The moderate risk area then, and where it was left today was at the top end for tornadoes. One click more and it would have been high, and with 2 days to go, not a stretch. But that sword cuts the other way too if things don't eventually line up. (Area could grow, or shrink, or have one part downgraded, and the other half upgrade).Maybe it's my not understanding what "enhanced", "moderate" and "high" risk means? 2 days ago the whole state was enhanced and moderate risk and you said that high risk wasn't a stretch.
Is everyone dead yet?
All these extra models etc... when I want a forecast I just go to NOAA and type in the name of the town or the zip code. It doesn't have the hype of all this other stuff, but it usually is pretty accurate at least for now.(Quiet voice) All along in this thread the local NWS has been pretty clear that it was going to be pretty iffy (conditional) in Iowa, regardless of what some of the sexy AI stuff was cranking out.
Then just go there and get that forecast. There are a lot of us who a super interested in the nuts and bolts of what goes into it and the nuances of it.All these extra models etc... when I want a forecast I just go to NOAA and type in the name of the town or the zip code. It doesn't have the hype of all this other stuff, but it usually is pretty accurate at least for now.
EF5 or GTFOAaaaand cue the iT wAs A bUsT crowd. Honest question, why do you folks even bother coming into these threads and/or watching the weather?
You don't think the forecast was served with a little bit of hype?...Geez CW did a podcast on Sunday devoted to todays weather based on the week long forecast of severe weather for Monday.But they didn't. If you listened and read, you'd know exactly what they were predicting.
You don't think the forecast was served with a little bit of hype?...Geez CW did a podcast on Sunday devoted to todays weather based on the week long forecast of severe weather for Monday.
Chris Williams or hassel aren’t meteorologistsYou don't think the forecast was served with a little bit of hype?...Geez CW did a podcast on Sunday devoted to todays weather based on the week long forecast of severe weather for Monday.