*** Official 2015-16 NBA Playoff Thread ***

Well saying Golden St has to win the title to set the wins record was wrong


The basically do. I thought that was understood. While technically they can get to the Finals and set the mark, nobody will remember this if they don't win the title. They have also proven to be less dominant. Every knows what you mean, yet I am forced to hold your hand and spell it out for you. Hmm
 
I was fine with them last year but the over-hyping and the extra favorable officiating they got all year has made me loathe the Warriors. I go cursing every time I see Curry chewing his mouthpiece, reminds me of kindergarten kid still sucking a pacifier.

Thats cute. Playing against the Thunder who are only here on favorable officiating.

1) Waiters push
2) No call foul on Westbrook Game 5
3) Westbrook travel game 1 (not a game changer)

The first two potentially were game changing calls at the end of games though.
 
Thats cute. Playing against the Thunder who are only here on favorable officiating.

1) Waiters push
2) No call foul on Westbrook Game 5
3) Westbrook travel game 1 (not a game changer)

The first two potentially were game changing calls at the end of games though.



Thats cute what about Green avoiding suspension for two kicks in consecutive games. The 2nd blatantly to the groin
 
Thats cute. Playing against the Thunder who are only here on favorable officiating.

1) Waiters push
2) No call foul on Westbrook Game 5
3) Westbrook travel game 1 (not a game changer)

The first two potentially were game changing calls at the end of games though.

Lolz, I hope you're not being serious.
 
What exactly would that be? Is what I said wrong? No. So......

Until 3 hours ago I had never heard anybody reference the most wins in a season as the Bulls regular and post season total. The number to beat has always been 72.
 
Until 3 hours ago I had never heard anybody reference the most wins in a season as the Bulls regular and post season total. The number to beat has always been 72.



So that automatically makes me wrong? You havent thought for 1 second that a team with 1 less reg season win, back in an era when guys played all 82 and every night meant more might actually be better if they dominated their respective playoffs? Glad I could open you up to the world of thought. Just because ESPN says so is a weak way to live. We call that the CyJack hi-jack, cause that's where he gets his. Oh he also geta his info from mindless Believeland schticks.
 
So that automatically makes me wrong? You havent thought for 1 second that a team with 1 less reg season win, back in an era when guys played all 82 and every night meant more might actually be better if they dominated their respective playoffs? Glad I could open you up to the world of thought. Just because ESPN says so is a weak way to live. We call that the CyJack hi-jack, cause that's where he gets his. Oh he also geta his info from mindless Believeland schticks.

I really don't care what point you're trying to make. Everybody, including yourself, knew what CyJack meant. You sound like an idiot trying to argue for the sake of arguing.
 
giphy.gif
 
Lolz, I hope you're not being serious.

I'm responding to a point on favorable offiating to golden state. OKC has been just favorable. Can debate that if you wish.

Congrats to Cleveland on winning their mid major championship. The NBA playoffs await.
 
This thread has a whole lot of stupid in it right now. Something about screen names starting with cyc...
 
So that automatically makes me wrong? You havent thought for 1 second that a team with 1 less reg season win, back in an era when guys played all 82 and every night meant more might actually be better if they dominated their respective playoffs? Glad I could open you up to the world of thought. Just because ESPN says so is a weak way to live. We call that the CyJack hi-jack, cause that's where he gets his. Oh he also geta his info from mindless Believeland schticks.

No offense (well, maybe a little since you're kinda acting like an ******* in this thread), but I just googled "NBA wins record and the only thing that came up on the first few pages of results was the 72 win mark that Golden State just beat. This includes links to NBA.com, so I think I'm going to go with that. I mean, if the NBA is saying that is the record, I'm going to go with it.
 
Oh thank goodness.

I think we need a separate thread for the casual NBA fan watching the playoffs who isn't involved in some long standing feud or interested in claiming NBA expert superiority. There was a game last night.
 
No offense (well, maybe a little since you're kinda acting like an ******* in this thread), but I just googled "NBA wins record and the only thing that came up on the first few pages of results was the 72 win mark that Golden State just beat. This includes links to NBA.com, so I think I'm going to go with that. I mean, if the NBA is saying that is the record, I'm going to go with it.

My influence runs deep...
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron