Cyhawk postgame thread

After some perusal of their fan sites and remembering that nothing is ever 100 % one way, nobody expected them to tie or go ahead in the last 1:40.

Or if ISU missed the field goal that they'd get the 20ish yards necessary to attempt one of their own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aclone
Iowa State is the big dog in this state and Hawkeye fans know it. All they have for hope these days is that ISU athletics will collapse due to realignment/budget issues. That's their big comeback in every conversation.
 
He said "us" numerous times referring to the hawk football team. I'm curious what number this guy wears on the team.
Proof that if you buy a microphone and a camera, you are a sports expert.
 
The design of those plays are having the RB downhill at the snap. They ran it a lot last year.

It's basically an off tackle tackle run but the pitch must be used to get the ball to the back quicker.
They run both.

The formation for this particular play was 22 personnel with double TEs on the right.

The TEs both crash down into the line and they pulled the RG and FB to lead block.

That play was certainly designed to go outside the double tights with Abu to read his pulling blockers against would be tacklers and use them as leverage to cut inside or bounce it out.

It was very loud. Sama, the outside TE, and the split WR on the left (all three the furthest from Rocco and Sama obviously behind) certainly didn’t hear the snap count and are all 3 late to move. This isn’t anyone’s fault but has an impact on timing.

Abu Sama’s body language and demeanor looked unsure in his post snap actions, he was a fraction late on the snap and stutter stepped. His path leads him forward and then slightly out.

However, the formation and the blocking scheme indicate the play was designed to go outside of a double tight end formation. Which is two gaps outside of the off-tackle C gap.

The ball was wet,
The stadium was loud,
22 personnel
The players were late
TEs crash down
RG and FB pull
Abu Stutter-steps
Rocco fires a pitch “high”
Goes through Abu’s hand (who BTW only had 8 Receptions last year)
Fumble

Play call (Rocco audible? ) was questionable considering conditions with down and distance.
 
They run both.

The formation for this particular play was 22 personnel with double TEs on the right.

The TEs both crash down into the line and they pulled the RG and FB to lead block.

That play was certainly designed to go outside the double tights with Abu to read his pulling blockers against would be tacklers and use them as leverage to cut inside or bounce it out.

It was very loud. Sama, the outside TE, and the split WR on the left (all three the furthest from Rocco and Sama obviously behind) certainly didn’t hear the snap count and are all 3 late to move. This isn’t anyone’s fault but has an impact on timing.

Abu Sama’s body language and demeanor looked unsure in his post snap actions, he was a fraction late on the snap and stutter stepped. His path leads him forward and then slightly out.

However, the formation and the blocking scheme indicate the play was designed to go outside of a double tight end formation. Which is two gaps outside of the off-tackle C gap.

The ball was wet,
The stadium was loud,
22 personnel
The players were late
TEs crash down
RG and FB pull
Abu Stutter-steps
Rocco fires a pitch “high”
Goes through Abu’s hand (who BTW only had 8 Receptions last year)
Fumble

Play call (Rocco audible? ) was questionable considering conditions with down and distance.

I think it's just as simple as they ran it in the downhill concept no matter the personnel like they've done before and fumbled and that's it. It doesn't need some sort of deep dive analytics.

Rocco's very good at sneaks and 1st or 2nd and goal at the 1 should imo be automatically just that instead of unnecessary risks.

OC's tend to overthink things and that may have been the case there.
 
I think it's just as simple as they ran it in the downhill concept no matter the personnel like they've done before and fumbled and that's it. It doesn't need some sort of deep dive analytics.

Rocco's very good at sneaks and 1st or 2nd and goal at the 1 should imo be automatically just that instead of unnecessary risks.

OC's tend to overthink things and that may have been the case there.
Agree QB sneak was the call,

I think Rocco audibles into the pitch , but usually Mouser gives him two plays. So likely it’s on Mouser if he had that play in the choice.

It’s not just the formation, it is the blocking scheme and where the runner’s point of attack will be, which is outside of where Abu was running downhill. He’s supposed to be outside more.

And if it was “downhill” then why the hesitation and stutter?

Maybe Abu didn’t hear the call switch because the FB turns to tell him.
 
No instate school to compete against doesn’t really apply to Illinois. All border state big ten schools recruit Illinois heavily.

Edit: and Notre dame is huge in Chicagoland.
Northwestern does not count?
 
Trying to figure out how to get my brain cells back after watching 10 seconds of that
You see it's just an intractable law of nature that the Cyclones can never be good no matter what!

All you have to do is ignore our record, our awesome coaching staff, our rock solid QB play, our defensive track record, and our elite fans, culture, NFL players, player development, recruiting wins, 63 yard kicks, TEs from Cedar Rapids you didn't offer....

And what does Iowa State actually have going for it, really????
 
I think Iowa's problem is that Kirk eventually got stuck on "this is what we do, it worked in the past, there's no reason to change it". Campbell has shown that he is willing to constantly analyze what they're doing and adjust what isn't working.
My Iowa friends are so sick of this. 4 and 2 from midfield and Ferentz refuses to go for it. They just want something different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride
"We were really close on that deep one... I guess that guy ended up making a good play kind of saving it by causing the PI. That could have ended up being a 75 yard touchdown and I mean that would have changed the game." Gronowski said.

Saw this in an article from Iowa Hawkeyes on SI. I can't figure out what he is talking about. They had a deep pass? And we committed Pass Interference to stop the catch? That isn't anything I remember. But if so, then yeah, that was a good play by our guy. Better to get 15 yards than give up a 75 yard TD.
lol is this the play he threw into triple coverage?

Good sir, if that PI didn’t occur, you would have only overthrew the receiver by 10 yards, not 20
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron