Finally got through every post in this thread...
I have some questions that I think get to the heart of it...
1. Who was the accuser who appealed to Leath during the summer? Was it the alleged victim or maybe a donor?
2. Why did it take Leath so long to render a decision?
After reading through all of this, it is my humble opinion that somebody who Iowa State values has a problem with Bubu playing basketball at Iowa State. Maybe a big donor? The only reason i can fathom Leath sitting on his decision until Bubu can't transfer is that somebody told him to or they won't donate anymore. That is it... in my mind anyway.
That is the crux of the issue... who was the person that appealed to Leath to get Bubu booted a second time? Obviously Leath wasn't going to do it without an outside appeal to him directly. That precedent had been set when Bubu got reinstated the first time and Leath and Pollard didn't have a problem.
Somebody important to ISU (not necessarily AT ISU) doesn't want Bubu to play basketball... not at ISU... not anywhere. Who is it?
I'm beginning to think that Diane Stahle might have been involved in this case much earlier and to a larger extent than has been made public to this point. There has to be a reason that Bubu's legal team has called her out. Leath is the one looking bad right now, but does anyone believe that he wasn't getting legal advise throughout the past year?
What bothers me about this involvement is that she had her hands all over the infamous athlete rape case in Iowa City back in 2007. The school clearly bungled that investigation and she was right in the middle of trying to defend what they did or didn't do.
It makes me wonder if she hasn't been the driving force to try to just make Bubu go away rather than make sure that discipline is fairly applied. It's wrong to let something slide based on someone being an athlete. It would be just as bad if punishment were applied simply because someone is an athlete.