Another Female Teacher 'Incident'

What tells us about her psyche is that she risked losing her job, doing jail time, and doing damage to her future employability just to have sex with multiple teenage boys, when she likely could have had as much sex as she wanted with men that wouldn't have risked all of those consequences. This is not normal. Hopefully the court will get her a pysch evaluation.
I assume this is directed at me since it followed my post and used the word psyche which I did as well. If you read my post and the post I was responding to you will see I was addressing the conclusions the poster was coming to based on her posting a picture of herself in a costume. I think it is a little ridiculous to draw a bunch of conclusions on mental state based on a picture that may have been taken and posted any time in the last several years including when she was in college. There are quite a few obvious issues based on her actions as you suggest, but to lump that picture in there I think it is probably grabbing at straws. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to think the media might use the most sensational photo they can find of the accused with their story.
 
I assume this is directed at me since it followed my post and used the word psyche which I did as well. If you read my post and the post I was responding to you will see I was addressing the conclusions the poster was coming to based on her posting a picture of herself in a costume. I think it is a little ridiculous to draw a bunch of conclusions on mental state based on a picture that may have been taken and posted any time in the last several years including when she was in college. There are quite a few obvious issues based on her actions as you suggest, but to lump that picture in there I think it is probably grabbing at straws. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to think the media might use the most sensational photo they can find of the accused with their story.

My post wasn't particularly directed at you. It was just my observation/opinion that her actions reflect some serious problems, and in a way, implying what you are saying that it is not necessary to use the picture to to come to that conclusion.
 
This was a very entertaining thread to read. I don't think gender makes a difference to me, its more age and consent. If the students were say 12, then I think automatic jail time no matter consent. At 16 I feel its a little tougher to say automatic jail-time if the students consented. I obviously don't know the actual law, this is just one idiots opinion. At 16 I feel you're smart enough to make decisions like this. However at 16 you're still a child with adult supervision so I see possible jail time if a parent really feels strongly about it. I think a teach should definitely be fired in all scenarios. Best practice for teachers, is to just not go there.

It happens more frequently I think than gets reported. I had a cousin, who easily could have had his way with his teacher at 17. She had to be like 30. He didn't go there, but he sure thought about it when everyone including his uncles were telling him to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc
Well the law disagrees with you. But by all mean continue with this asinine reasoning...

Sorry - I don't think every case of sex is rape or abuse of power and I'm reasonably familiar with the legality of it. I'm unconvinced she was grooming these kids like a pedophile would. Nothing I've read leads me to believe the "victims" were innocent lambs who were lead to slaughter by this succubus.

A few on here are WAY more into this than I am. She's hot, I wish I could have been "victimized" by someone like her when I was a senior in high school.

Teachers should not have sex with pupils - especially non-consenting pupils. Consenting adults is sex - plain, simple and dirty. Non-consenting adults are the horrible victims of rape which has nothing at all to do with sex.

Sorry Puritan - I don't see it your way and both of us should be happy about that.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: isufbcurt
My post wasn't particularly directed at you. It was just my observation/opinion that her actions reflect some serious problems, and in a way, implying what you are saying that it is not necessary to use the picture to to come to that conclusion.

Most of us on this board have more risque pictures floating around than hers. Trust me - I Iooked.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isufbcurt
It happens more frequently I think than gets reported. I had a cousin, who easily could have had his way with his teacher at 17. She had to be like 30. He didn't go there, but he sure thought about it when everyone including his uncles were telling him to do it.
Or, he did go there and he kept his lips sealed shut. ;)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: dawgpound and GTO
Sorry - I don't think every case of sex is rape or abuse of power and I'm reasonably familiar with the legality of it. I'm unconvinced she was grooming these kids like a pedophile would. Nothing I've read leads me to believe the "victims" were innocent lambs who were lead to slaughter by this succubus.

A few on here are WAY more into this than I am. She's hot, I wish I could have been "victimized" by someone like her when I was a senior in high school.

Teachers should not have sex with pupils - especially non-consenting pupils. Consenting adults is sex - plain, simple and dirty. Non-consenting adults are the horrible victims of rape which has nothing at all to do with sex.

Sorry Puritan - I don't see it your way and both of us should be happy about that.
If thinking felony sexual contact with a minor is a big deal even though she is hot makes me a puritan than so be it. Sorry I don't need to live out school boy fantasies.
 
Here's my theory: The Teacher is completely insecure young lady. The popular good looking macho dominant alpha students flirted with her and she highly enjoyed it. The alpha males sensed blood in the water, she was too insecure to realize the situation and grew to love the attention the students gave her. The students eventually closed the deal.

I fear this is most likely the case. Not a teacher taking advantage, but rather the students taking advantage of an incredibly insecure girl. Really, why else would she do it. Not to mention "on average" confident 25 year olds who carry themselves correctly do not post seductive pictures of themselves as "sexy cop" on their facebook (or where ever the media retrieved this from).

Just a bad situation all around. 17 year old hormones at work. We've all been there, some of us are still going through it.

go on instagram...
 
  • Winner
Reactions: isufbcurt
If thinking felony sexual contact with a minor is a big deal even though she is hot makes me a puritan than so be it. Sorry I don't need to live out school boy fantasies.

What's the age of consent? Can a 17 year old boy legally have sex with a 25 year old woman?
 
What's the age of consent? Can a 17 year old boy legally have sex with a 25 year old woman?
Not if the 25 year old works at the school he attends.

From North Carolina General Statutes § 14-32 :

(a) If a defendant, who is a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, at any age, or who is other school personnel, and who is at least four years older than the victim engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with a victim who is a student, at any time during or after the time the defendant and victim were present together in the same school, but before the victim ceases to be a student, the defendant is guilty of a Class G felony, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the student. The term "same school" means a school at which the student is enrolled and the defendant is employed, assigned, or volunteers.

(b) A defendant who is school personnel, other than a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, and is less than four years older than the victim and engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with a victim who is a student, is guilty of a Class I felony.

(c) This section shall apply unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing for greater punishment.

(d) Consent is not a defense to a charge under this section.

(e) For purposes of this section, the terms "school", "school personnel", and "student" shall have the same meaning as in G.S. 14-202.4(d). For purposes of this section, the term "school safety officer" shall include a school resource officer or any other person who is regularly present in a school for the purpose of promoting and maintaining safe and orderly schools. (1979, c. 682, s. 1; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1316, s. 9; 1981, c. 63; c. 179, s. 14; 1993, c. 539, s. 1132; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1999-300, s. 2; 2003-98, s. 1; 2015-44, s. 2; 2015-181, s. 14(a), (b).)
 
Last edited:
Not if the 25 year old works at the school he attends.

From North Carolina General Statutes § 14-32 :

(a) If a defendant, who is a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, at any age, or who is other school personnel, and who is at least four years older than the victim engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with a victim who is a student, at any time during or after the time the defendant and victim were present together in the same school, but before the victim ceases to be a student, the defendant is guilty of a Class G felony, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the student. The term "same school" means a school at which the student is enrolled and the defendant is employed, assigned, or volunteers.

(b) A defendant who is school personnel, other than a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, and is less than four years older than the victim and engages in vaginal intercourse or a sexual act with a victim who is a student, is guilty of a Class I felony.

(c) This section shall apply unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing for greater punishment.

(d) Consent is not a defense to a charge under this section.

(e) For purposes of this section, the terms "school", "school personnel", and "student" shall have the same meaning as in G.S. 14-202.4(d). For purposes of this section, the term "school safety officer" shall include a school resource officer or any other person who is regularly present in a school for the purpose of promoting and maintaining safe and orderly schools. (1979, c. 682, s. 1; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1316, s. 9; 1981, c. 63; c. 179, s. 14; 1993, c. 539, s. 1132; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1999-300, s. 2; 2003-98, s. 1; 2015-44, s. 2; 2015-181, s. 14(a), (b).)

I read that too. The age limit makes some sense but when you arbitrarily impose these other hurdles simply because you work in a certain job is - well arbitrary. Unless and until you can demonstrate an abuse of power of her position to entice these young men into sex, my opinion still stands.

So for YOU, should these young men have sex with a 25 year old homeless meth addict then all is right in your world and lady justice is sated?
 
I read that too. The age limit makes some sense but when you arbitrarily impose these other hurdles simply because you work in a certain job is - well arbitrary. Unless and until you can demonstrate an abuse of power of her position to entice these young men into sex, my opinion still stands.

So for YOU, should these young men have sex with a 25 year old homeless meth addict then all is right in your world and lady justice is sated?
It isn't against the law, you may or may not concern yourself with that.

Honestly I don't care - I have zero burden of proof to think what she did is not criminal - other than the law of course.

I am not really sure what you concern yourself with honestly

Had this been a male teacher, I would feel exactly opposite and would look at the teacher as preying on young girls. In this case - nope.

IF someone uses their position of power to seduce children, that's wrong m'kay. I do not feel this is that situation. Consensual sex is consensual sex regardless of gender but that doesn't mean she shouldn't lose her job.

Now, we do not yet know who initiated the relationship in this situation but of the four people involved there is ONE who knew beyond any doubt that they should not be in the relationship and had the power to stop it. That is the teacher. The teacher had all of the power in this relationship and she chose not to end it.

I'm done.
 
if even half-serious, this is honestly the most disturbing post on this thread. as someone with an advanced science degree and close female friends with the same -- trust me, this **** isn't funny any more.
:rolleyes:
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Tailg8er
There are 4 types of people in this thread.

1. The people joking it's ok because she's hot.
2. The people who think it's wrong, but probably shouldn't have as tough of penalties as those that exist.
3. The letter of the law / it's creepy if the teacher was a dude folks.
4. Argent
 
Here's my theory: The Teacher is completely insecure young lady. The popular good looking macho dominant alpha students flirted with her and she highly enjoyed it. The alpha males sensed blood in the water, she was too insecure to realize the situation and grew to love the attention the students gave her. The students eventually closed the deal.

I fear this is most likely the case. Not a teacher taking advantage, but rather the students taking advantage of an incredibly insecure girl. Really, why else would she do it. Not to mention "on average" confident 25 year olds who carry themselves correctly do not post seductive pictures of themselves as "sexy cop" on their facebook (or where ever the media retrieved this from).

Just a bad situation all around. 17 year old hormones at work. We've all been there, some of us are still going through it.

I think you may have missed the last however many years that humans have grown more and obsessed with promoting themselves in anyway possible, including seductively. Not saying the wastes of space below are being seductive, but it's a prime example of vanity and machines taking over.