Right, 4 seed. Ok, gotchyaNo. We’re not a 2 after that blowout diarrhea performance against Arizona. Beating Arizona State won’t put us back on the 2 line. We might even be looking at a 4.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right, 4 seed. Ok, gotchyaNo. We’re not a 2 after that blowout diarrhea performance against Arizona. Beating Arizona State won’t put us back on the 2 line. We might even be looking at a 4.
What you say is logical but I think it depends on how much the eye test is valued because visually Iowa State just doesn't look competitive in these games. Losing big to a BYU team that has gotten blown out by everybody else since Saunders went down and to a couple of likely non-tournament teams, same to Texas Tech without their best player who just went down to TCU at home, Arizona is understandable but they looked outmatched pretty badly. It's not just the losses, these are ugly losses to people who saw the games.Let's look at this logically.
On first bracket reveal ISU was a 1.
Houston, Purdue, UConn and Illinois were 2's.
Sparty a 4. Florida a 3, Zaga a 3, Tech a 3.
This was on 02/21
Florida is a 2 or 1 so that is one spot lost. No debate
ISU since then lost ,to 3 tourney teams 2 on the road and 1 at home.
Purdue lost to a Tourney team at home and a bubble team. They lost to ISU at home.
Houston lost to 2 tournament teams and beat CU nothing on their resume to pass ISU especially since ISU started as a 1. They lost to ISU
Illinois lost to UCLA and Michigan. Their last 2 games will not help them much. 2 bottom dwellers big 10 Again fair to ask why are they ahead of ISU?
Tech beat ISU and won 3 in a row 1 against maybe bubble team(Bearcats) They were a 4 do they jump to a 2? It could happen they got dinged for no Toppin first release. But they are still playing well. To win at Zona and ISU is crazy impressive . They still have to play at BYU who might need to play with their hair on fire
Sparty 3-0 with a win at Purdue. And beat a couple of teams that may or may not make the tourney. They go to Michigan last game of the year
Zaga a couple of wins against WCC teams and lost to 1 tourney team they played
So right now I would say ISU is a 2 with MSU and 1 other . UConn or Florida is a 2 lock
Data kind of points that way it seems.
Would wager ISU would be a 2 if reveal was this coming Sunday
And a 2 or 3 is not really a big thing. Unless Florida is a 2. That would suck for the 3
Also need to remember that the committee members are not Iowa St fans and do not follow the games as closely as us. They see W/L record, quad wins and losses, and I'm sure they follow AP rankings.What you say is logical but I think it depends on how much the eye test is valued because visually Iowa State just doesn't look competitive in these games. Losing big to a BYU team that has gotten blown out by everybody else since Saunders went down and to a couple of likely non-tournament teams, same to Texas Tech without their best player who just went down to TCU at home, Arizona is understandable but they looked outmatched pretty badly. It's not just the losses, these are ugly losses to people who saw the games.
No but they definitely watch the games especially as we near March, especially the nationally televised ones like the last 3 have been and it hasn't been in favor of Iowa State to say the least. I see a team that is on the bubble of a 2 to 3 seed, anywhere from 7th overall to 10th overall whereas they looked to be more like 4th-7th prior.Also need to remember that the committee members are not Iowa St fans and do not follow the games as closely as us. They see W/L record, quad wins and losses, and I'm sure they follow AP rankings.
Expect a 3 seed, could still earn a 2 with no bad losses and a good win in KC, only way to a 4 is an AZ St and/or bad Wednesday loss in KC. That's really it.
As has been mentioned repeatedly, don't count on games in KC bailing out resumes for seeding. The cake is pretty much baked by that point.This is 100% where I'm at. Think we are a 3 if we don't win at least 2 in KC.
5 of the 7 ASU wins have come on the 2nd game of the Arizona road trip for the teams they have beat. Their two Utah wins are the only ones that have not come right after the other team played at Arizona.Whoever is thinking ASU will be a cakewalk, they are up on KU with 6 to go in the second.
If we beat ASU on Saturday there is zero chance we are a 4 regardless of what happens in our first round game in KC.Expect a 3 seed, could still earn a 2 with no bad losses and a good win in KC, only way to a 4 is an AZ St and/or bad Wednesday loss in KC. That's really it.
I really don't see how a 4 would be in play at this point. I think we're a two with a win against ASU, and would probably be the top 3 if we lose that one.Expect a 3 seed, could still earn a 2 with no bad losses and a good win in KC, only way to a 4 is an AZ St and/or bad Wednesday loss in KC. That's really it.
View attachment 168442
I've seen the committee do much worse. Until I hear we are a 2 or 3, I expect the worst from them.
We win Saturday we will be at worst a 3 seed.
The only difference is you play a 6 seed vs a 7 seed in the second round, and the color of jersey you wear in the Sweet 16. For me, I couldn't care less between a 2 or a 3 seed this year. 4 seed would suck as it gets very difficult to make it to the Elite 8.Not much difference between a 2 and 3.
Not much difference between a 2 and 3.
Somebody really athletic, that almost always shoots poorly from 3. Almost always!Nope only real difference is you most likely are playing a P6 team in the Round of 32.
We were a 3 last year………Not much difference between a 2 and 3.
We were a 3 last year………