2025-2026 MBB computer projections thread

Let's look at this logically.
On first bracket reveal ISU was a 1.

Houston, Purdue, UConn and Illinois were 2's.

Sparty a 4. Florida a 3, Zaga a 3, Tech a 3.

This was on 02/21

Florida is a 2 or 1 so that is one spot lost. No debate

ISU since then lost ,to 3 tourney teams 2 on the road and 1 at home.

Purdue lost to a Tourney team at home and a bubble team. They lost to ISU at home.

Houston lost to 2 tournament teams and beat CU nothing on their resume to pass ISU especially since ISU started as a 1. They lost to ISU


Illinois lost to UCLA and Michigan. Their last 2 games will not help them much. 2 bottom dwellers big 10 Again fair to ask why are they ahead of ISU?


Tech beat ISU and won 3 in a row 1 against maybe bubble team(Bearcats) They were a 4 do they jump to a 2? It could happen they got dinged for no Toppin first release. But they are still playing well. To win at Zona and ISU is crazy impressive . They still have to play at BYU who might need to play with their hair on fire


Sparty 3-0 with a win at Purdue. And beat a couple of teams that may or may not make the tourney. They go to Michigan last game of the year

Zaga a couple of wins against WCC teams and lost to 1 tourney team they played

So right now I would say ISU is a 2 with MSU and 1 other . UConn or Florida is a 2 lock

Data kind of points that way it seems.
Would wager ISU would be a 2 if reveal was this coming Sunday

And a 2 or 3 is not really a big thing. Unless Florida is a 2. That would suck for the 3
What you say is logical but I think it depends on how much the eye test is valued because visually Iowa State just doesn't look competitive in these games. Losing big to a BYU team that has gotten blown out by everybody else since Saunders went down and to a couple of likely non-tournament teams, same to Texas Tech without their best player who just went down to TCU at home, Arizona is understandable but they looked outmatched pretty badly. It's not just the losses, these are ugly losses to people who saw the games.
Ever since the reveal came out, the Cyclones have stumbled pretty badly so is it enough to drop them from 4 to 9? I'm not sure but I'd say that they're definitely teetering on the edge of dropping to a 3.

Florida is on the opposite side of the spectrum. None of the opponents they've beaten are particularly impressive, a function of a weakened SEC this season, but they've beaten the snot out of everybody and just look the part of a 1 seed even if the computer numbers don't bear that out. Iowa State has pretty good computer numbers and better wins than Florida but they just don't look like a highly competitive team when you see the games.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fsanford
What you say is logical but I think it depends on how much the eye test is valued because visually Iowa State just doesn't look competitive in these games. Losing big to a BYU team that has gotten blown out by everybody else since Saunders went down and to a couple of likely non-tournament teams, same to Texas Tech without their best player who just went down to TCU at home, Arizona is understandable but they looked outmatched pretty badly. It's not just the losses, these are ugly losses to people who saw the games.
Also need to remember that the committee members are not Iowa St fans and do not follow the games as closely as us. They see W/L record, quad wins and losses, and I'm sure they follow AP rankings.
 
credit to @NiceMarmot in another thread, but I agree that as of today Iowa State is probably somewhere from eighth overall to tenth. Handle your business and I don't think a quarterfinal loss to Kansas would drop you further. 1. Michigan State beating Michigan and 2. Michigan State, Illinois, or Nebraska rolling through the Big Ten tournament are the only things that could change that IMHO, with the likelihood of 2. impacting seeding being much lower than 1.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: isufbcurt
Also need to remember that the committee members are not Iowa St fans and do not follow the games as closely as us. They see W/L record, quad wins and losses, and I'm sure they follow AP rankings.
No but they definitely watch the games especially as we near March, especially the nationally televised ones like the last 3 have been and it hasn't been in favor of Iowa State to say the least. I see a team that is on the bubble of a 2 to 3 seed, anywhere from 7th overall to 10th overall whereas they looked to be more like 4th-7th prior.
 
Expect a 3 seed, could still earn a 2 with no bad losses and a good win in KC, only way to a 4 is an AZ St and/or bad Wednesday loss in KC. That's really it.
 
Whoever is thinking ASU will be a cakewalk, they are up on KU with 6 to go in the second.
5 of the 7 ASU wins have come on the 2nd game of the Arizona road trip for the teams they have beat. Their two Utah wins are the only ones that have not come right after the other team played at Arizona.
 
Not much difference between a 2 and 3.
The only difference is you play a 6 seed vs a 7 seed in the second round, and the color of jersey you wear in the Sweet 16. For me, I couldn't care less between a 2 or a 3 seed this year. 4 seed would suck as it gets very difficult to make it to the Elite 8.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mj4cy and Cyballzz

Help Support Us

Become a patron