Asking again: Has the rot started to set in?
- Thread starter Gunnerclone
- Start date
Personally do not care specific names from Rotters for said Campbell replacement.
However, there is no doubt Pollard has alerts set to this thread and The Rotters.
He is intently watching.
So in order to potentially persuade and expedite Pollard’s removal of CMC, you should start releasing a short list for Rotter Approved Replacements. R.A.R.’s if you will.
If you come up with some sure-fire recommendations….CMC may be gone by Thanksgiving!
However, there is no doubt Pollard has alerts set to this thread and The Rotters.
He is intently watching.
So in order to potentially persuade and expedite Pollard’s removal of CMC, you should start releasing a short list for Rotter Approved Replacements. R.A.R.’s if you will.
If you come up with some sure-fire recommendations….CMC may be gone by Thanksgiving!
We've been doing the same thing on both sides of the ball all season.
Apparently ISU didn't know it could self scout during the bye week.
So little creativity and improvement.
Abu still running for the sideline sure is fun.
The 3 d linemen just playing straight up pinch and tickle with the offensive line isn't producing any pressure.
Who knew?
We are what we are, and CMC is what he is. Red Ferentz.
The next step costs at least 30 million dollars. We'd love to hear your plan.
this had been improved the last two years, but seems like things regressed after the bye.
This is the coach worship part I don’t like. He’s building on the good parts of what McCarney and Rhoads did and the work JP has put in (and that’s not a knock on CMC that is what he should do and has done). The next guy should be able to build on top of that. It’s a structure built from the ground up, not the top down.
Can you make a bad hire? Yep. Can you make a great hire? Yep. No one knows what would happen.
I NEED NAMES THOUGH GOD DAMMIT. **** off.
Campbell is a good coach and has no problem winning here.. comparatively speaking to other coaches we've had.
How can you be so sure a new hire would be a good coach? Iowa State is sure as sh*t not hiring a current P4 good coach, so you'd take a chance on a young guy and hope it works.
Say you do that, you're looking at 2-3 years minimum to probably get it up and running. If it doesn't work? You're even further behind. If it works, that guy is potentially leaving for bigger and better places and your behind.. again.
The stability you currently have with Campbell and pairing that with the winning he is doing is irreplaceable.
Gunner needs to stop with the weed, get out of his parents basement, and get a dose of reality.
how is ANY of that iowa states fault or matt Campbell's fault? Dodged???
That is one of the dumbest things ive' read and i post ALOT of dumb sh*t.
Last edited:
The stability is key. Best case scenario: There might be some young guy who could come in here and win 9-10 games for 2 years and then bounce, taking all his players with him.
Is that really what you want?
Exactly. Campbell has proven he wants to be here.
Now, you could potentially get yourself another hire like that, but doubtful in today$ climate.
Transfer portal and NIL has completely changed the game. These rotters live in the past where players were stuck and had to just play for the next guy.
Hire a new G5 coach or whatever, get stuck with a G5 roster. Does it end up like Indiana? I guess maybe, but more than likely, no.
One of the rotters predicted Scott Frost to win 9 games like 5 years ago and Nebraska still hasn't had a winning record. Not sure I trust his opinion.
The Curt Cignetti experiment will be interesting to see going forward. 63 year old coach whose only on his 3rd year of being a head coach (2 years prior at James Madison)
Quite right. When the schedule came out ISU was supposed to play 3 of the top 4 teams. It is just that nobody bothered to tell those 'top teams' that they were supposed to be good this year.
You’re positing that ISU is on an upward trajectory of improved results and program health independent of the staff and that this will continue on an upward trend no matter who is at the helm.
What we do know:
- ISU will improve after moving on from MC even if we have a series of unsuccessful hires.
- MC will not improve, ISU deserves more, and is better off without him
Is that accurate?
Last edited:
For the record, I defended this question initially being asked, when it was. This tripling down I don’t.
So let’s fire our most successful head coach in our history in the middle of a 7-2 season just because someone might be better or they might be worse? So glad you’re not the AD.
The reason I want names is because hopefully you’ll have the self awareness to realize you’re an idiot. Your post just proves you’re an idiot with zero self awareness
