******* Iowa Weekly Discussion Thread***

Dopey

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2009
3,262
2,119
113
Every year the chicken littles come out pissing their pants like Iowa is some national power like Georgia. It's pathetic.
I don’t see many compliments of Iowas prowess.

Many stating the obvious that our weaknesses yesterday play into their typical strengths.

And we’re 1-7 against them. You’d be silly to be confident at this point.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,800
24,897
113
They are the fake ID of college football, feasting on a soft B1G West schedule. But CMC is 1-7 against them. CMC has lost to them with some of our best teams ever. There is a good reason people have minimal confidence playing them at this point.

Hell, at this point I feel more confident lining up against Oklahoma than iowa.

I don’t have a lot of confidence of lining up against Oklahoma this year. But I’m willing to be wrong on that.
 

mitchforcy

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2009
1,203
1,361
113
Their offense looks much better than last year which was the worst offense I have ever seen. They scored 7 points against sdsu a couple years ago for **** sake. They’ll have more success moving the ball against us than previous years but I think Rocco and the receiving core will prove to be enough for the W.
 

CyCity

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 28, 2014
2,064
4,774
113
West Des Moines
They are the fake ID of college football, feasting on a soft B1G West schedule. But CMC is 1-7 against them. CMC has lost to them with some of our best teams ever. There is a good reason people have minimal confidence playing them at this point.

Hell, at this point I feel more confident lining up against Oklahoma than iowa.
He’s 1-6 against them. We also didn’t play Iowa with our best team ever.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,800
24,897
113
Their offense looks much better than last year which was the worst offense I have ever seen. They scored 7 points against sdsu a couple years ago for **** sake. They’ll have more success moving the ball against us than previous years but I think Rocco and the receiving core will prove to be enough for the W.

I agree. But at the same time, our defensive scheme is better suited to stop this type of passing offense better than their 3 TE play it in a phone booth style they’ve run before.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,270
55,162
113
Things I'm looking for:
Same as last week. See if the OL and DL can progress.

For this game in particular, for ISU to be succinct and take what's there. Maybe more roll outs with Becht to get Iowa moving.

I'd guess a 20-14 type of loss with some plays left out there.
 
Last edited:

Koala

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2024
246
294
63
At the end of broadcast in talking about the upcoming cy-hawk game John and Eric brought up that we have played them better in Iowa City as of recent history. Hope trend can continue.
That has to be purely vibes based since the last time there was a win. Campbell's teams have played there 3 times and only scored 16 total points.
 

coolerifyoudid

Well-Known Member
Feb 8, 2013
17,317
27,032
113
KC
Iowa is comfortable getting 4 yards, three yards, three yards, rinse, repeat. It's boring and frustratingly effective. I actually like our offense matching up versus their defense, but we need to get more than 3 possessions a half.

I trust Heacock to adjust, but if he waits until Iowa goes up 14-3, it's going to be a frustrating game to watch. I'd like to see us take some chances early on both sides of the ball versus us letting them dictate the pace.

It's not in Campbell's wheelhouse to risk a fast 3 and out to put his defense back on the field quickly, but the defense gets just as dejected watching the offense flounder with conservative play calling and then sending them back on the field to "keep them in the game".

I just want to see us play to win from the get-go versus playing to keep it close and then win in the 4th quarter.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,744
31,094
113
Behind you
Their offense looks much better than last year which was the worst offense I have ever seen. They scored 7 points against sdsu a couple years ago for **** sake. They’ll have more success moving the ball against us than previous years but I think Rocco and the receiving core will prove to be enough for the W.
Nope.
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,364
66,334
113
Colorado

FbwRg6lXkAEEcS2.jpg
 

rosshm16

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 8, 2023
5,190
8,471
113
I can’t tell much with ISU. But, there are several members of the conference that I will go ahead and put that W in ink. I think ISU still has a decent chance of being in the conversation for the CCG regardless of how the Iowa game turns out.
I'm pretty optimistic right now despite our less-than-great showing on Saturday. Among our upcoming opponents:
  • Iowa managed ~125 yards and two field goals in an entire half against a bad FCS team
  • Houston got their doors blown off at home by UNLV
  • West Virginia looked pretty overmatched against Penn State
  • Texas Tech gave up 51 points to Abilene Christian
Win three of those four and even if we split Baylor and UCF at home, you're 6-2, I'll take it.
 

GoHawks

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2009
3,794
2,237
113
Clearly didn’t cause any issues yesterday, but has to feel like you’re playing with fire once he starts facing better secondaries
Yes, it's a major concern this weekend against Iowa State. Biggest reasons Iowa's won most the games in the series recently is they've not turned it over much and had a big advantage in the punting game Essentially dominating field position. The punting advantage is gone and McNamara is a lot looser with the ball. Some of the risk is welcomed going forward but I do worry in what's likely to be a close game and against as good of secondary as Iowa State's