*** Official Iowa State Season Thread ***

Disappointed? Not necessarily. I won a bunch of money because this blowout was predictable.

I came into this year hoping to see glimpses for the future, and last night, if nothing else, was a chance to really see the freshman play. And what I saw was guys that are 2+ years away from being major contributors. That's just not the timeline we are on.

You watch those two freshmen for OSU, Walker and Alexander-Moncrief, and you'd have thought they were top 50 prospects. Walker was #102 and Alexander-Moncrief was #160. The difference is they've received actual coaching and motivation.

I'd like to think they were also recruited to fit a role for a plan that OSU has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clonefan32
i think many fans have given up. Hilton would be pretty sparse.

I was actually pretty thrilled to only have to buy 3 games to keep my season tickets this year. Why drive 200 miles and waste 6 hours - 18 effing times - thru the winter weather, just to watch this crime against basketball?
 
  • Useful
Reactions: CyBobby

hard to believe the same george conditt was making 3's as an 18 yr old...

I'm afraid Steve may have broke him.

They tried to bulk him up and make him a traditional big. In doing so the lost sight of what he was good at, which was stretching the floor and pick and roll/pop.
 
I'm afraid Steve may have broke him.

They tried to bulk him up and make him a traditional big. In doing so the lost sight of what he was good at, which was stretching the floor and pick and roll/pop.
I think he looks good with the weight. But he has no feel for the back to the basket game. He would be great as a pick n pop guy, that is if he can shoot worth a lick. Doesn't seem like he's got a huge knack for that either
 
Out rebounded by 30 and another 20+ point loss at hilton.
That was the game last night. If they get out rebounded by only 15 its a much closer game, possibly even swings back our way with all of okies turnovers. There were multiple long stretches of us getting zero rebounds and their guys just stood near their own rim and got cheap put backs. Shorthanded or not, you should never give up that many boards to a team that isn't much bigger than you. Conditt was by far the biggest player for either team size wise, but couldn't stay on the floor.
 
oh Randy. Just because Conditt is tall doesn’t mean he has NBA potential.

Conditt is a square peg that Prohm has been trying to jam into a round hole for 3 years. Conditt is your classic rim runner, a big who loves to run and play in space. He should be playing for an uptempo team somewhere, or only be used when we go uptempo (which we don't, of course).

Rather than try to coach him on skills to make him more effective in this role, and then use him in that role... Prohm has been trying to turn him into a Jared Homan type space heater.

That's why you see him "regressing". He is being coached/developed in the OPPOSITE way of what he should be. I would say Prohm has ruined any chance for GC4 to play professionally anywhere. He wasn't going NBA, but he could have had a nice run in Europe. CPS just killed his development and any professional career potential. Absolute malpractice.

My 2 cents, I could be wrong.
 
Are people actually disappointed in last night?

Did they expect a different result with a limited roster that was already limited for a whole bunch of reasons?

Which games does anyone expect us to win the rest of the season?

The over/under on wins the rest of the season is probably 0.5, right? Good lord.
 
Conditt is a square peg that Prohm has been trying to jam into a round hole for 3 years. Conditt is your classic rim runner, a big who loves to run and play in space. He should be playing for an uptempo team somewhere, or only be used when we go uptempo (which we don't, of course).

Rather than try to coach him on skills to make him more effective in this role, and then use him in that role... Prohm has been trying to turn him into a Jared Homan type space heater.

That's why you see him "regressing". He is being coached/developed in the OPPOSITE way of what he should be. I would say Prohm has ruined any chance for GC4 to play professionally anywhere. He wasn't going NBA, but he could have had a nice run in Europe. CPS just killed his development and any professional career potential. Absolute malpractice.

My 2 cents, I could be wrong.

Kind of a microcosm of what has seemed like an issue under CSP...figuring out the strengths and going with it.

Not that it would have mattered as it was a 'gap year' (or so we thought) but as a prime example, I remember it took a few games before NWB took over at point guard in 17-18.

What was happening at practice that didn't make it obvious that he fit that role better than DJ, and DJ fit better as a scrambling spot/off screen shooter?

Team can't play defense very well? Ok, keep it serviceable, focus on offense and see if it gets better as the team gels.
 
Conditt is a square peg that Prohm has been trying to jam into a round hole for 3 years. Conditt is your classic rim runner, a big who loves to run and play in space. He should be playing for an uptempo team somewhere, or only be used when we go uptempo (which we don't, of course).

Rather than try to coach him on skills to make him more effective in this role, and then use him in that role... Prohm has been trying to turn him into a Jared Homan type space heater.

That's why you see him "regressing". He is being coached/developed in the OPPOSITE way of what he should be. I would say Prohm has ruined any chance for GC4 to play professionally anywhere. He wasn't going NBA, but he could have had a nice run in Europe. CPS just killed his development and any professional career potential. Absolute malpractice.

My 2 cents, I could be wrong.



Maybe my old brain isn't functioning properly but I thought he was always in the project/developmental category.

A guy you take when you have a legit roster that can give him time.

We have pretty much roster collapse so we're looking at the not pretty result.
 
I will say I have been, and continue to be, very much in favor of playing these games. But there was a point last night when Prohm was in the huddle, with everyone wearing a mask, in an empty gym talking to a group of 8 players and I thought "what are we doing here."
 
Last edited:
Maybe my old brain isn't functioning properly but I thought he was always in the project/developmental category.

A guy you take when you have a legit roster that can give him time.

We have pretty much roster collapse so we're looking at the not pretty result.
I agree. I'm not sure where it's coming from that Conditt was going to be the next coming of Craig Brackins or Marcus Fizer. All this talk of him regressing, but regression from what exactly? He came in as the lowest rated recruit in his class. People were excited because he was 6'10", a legacy, and came in and had a few surprising moments as a FR. Bottom line though is he might just be what he is. A fringe P6 talent backup 5. He doesn't have a 3 point shot. I think his ceiling was Jameel McKay. Floor is Simeon Carter. He is somewhere in the middle right now, and not sure if we see him get to his peak here.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: SolarGarlic
Game ball to Nate Jenkins. There are some physical limitations there, but he plays smart and hard. Seems fundamentally sound. More than I can say for a lot of our scholarship guys.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Statefan10
Game ball to Nate Jenkins. There are some physical limitations there, but he plays smart and hard. Seems fundamentally sound. More than I can say for a lot of our scholarship guys.

I'm not sure that's fair. Jenkins played fine, but he knew his role. His job was to play defense and keep the ball moving. It's easy to be "fundamentally sound" when you aren't really looking to score.

Unfortunately guys like Harris and Bolton don't have that option as we look to them to create offense, which can lead to "not being fundamentally sound" when you are trying to create offense on a bad offensive team.
 
I'm not sure that's fair. Jenkins played fine, but he knew his role. His job was to play defense and keep the ball moving. It's easy to be "fundamentally sound" when you aren't really looking to score.

Unfortunately guys like Harris and Bolton don't have that option as we look to them to create offense, which can lead to "not being fundamentally sound" when you are trying to create offense on a bad offensive team.
I like seeing kids like Jenkins get a shot. But yes, unfair to Bolton and to a lesser extent Harris. Mostly referring to the freshmen and GC though.
 
I like seeing kids like Jenkins get a shot. But yes, unfair to Bolton and to a lesser extent Harris. Mostly referring to the freshmen and GC though.

I'd say my logic extends to GC and the freshmen too, at least for this past game. Those guys, as at least rotation players, know with 8 guys they can't afford to just be a placeholder. So they maybe pushed in ways they wouldn't ordinarily push.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron