Taxes

  • After Iowa State won the Big 12, a Cyclone made a wonderful offer to We Will that now increases our match. Now all gifts up to $400,000 between now and the Final 4 will be matched. Please consider giving at We Will Collective.
    This notice can be dismissed using the upper right corner X button.

cy4life94

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 26, 2012
587
260
63
Cedar Rapids
Uhh no. I've invested at a 62% return the past year. I had a refund around $2,450 in taxes last year. I take that $2,450 and turn around and invest that I come out ahead at $3,969.
I believe a more realistic example would be say I get a $2400 dollar refund at the end of the year. Instead of the refund let’s say I save the $200 per month and make 8% percent on it for the year for a total of $2503. Short answer is yes, you are better off getting as small of refund as possible back, but for most people it is not enough of a difference for the effort it would take.
 

dmclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
20,690
4,810
113
50131
I don't know if this is fake news but here you go:

https://www.atr.org/treasury-tax-refunds-match-previous-year


In net, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a tax cut for the majority of Americans, including middle class families:



  • 90 percent of wage earners have seen more money in their paychecks.
  • Taxpayers earning between $20,000 and $50,000 are seeing net federal tax cuts of 10 percent or higher according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.
  • 91 percent of taxpayers with annual income between $64,000 and $108,000 are seeing a 2018 federal tax cut averaging $1,400 according to the left of center Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy.
  • A family of four with annual income of $73,000 is seeing a 60 percent reduction in federal taxes totaling more than $2,058.
 

CloneFan4

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2010
5,882
5,593
113
West Des Moines
Very few people are going to earn 62% on an investment in a year, and the few who can are very unlikely to replicate it over time. I can't believe an accountant would peddle this as legitimate advice.

Don't be dense. Nowhere did I say a 62% return is normal. Take the average 9% return on investments and you're still cash ahead.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
6,857
11,205
113
Don't be dense. Nowhere did I say a 62% return is normal. Take the average 9% return on investments and you're still cash ahead.

Nice backpedal. No, you did not literally say those words. It was implied.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: wxman1

stateofmind

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2007
6,472
3,932
113
Ankeny
I actually get a refund every year, and since my wife doesn't work I usually write a check to our IRA for $5,500. If you are in my position, make sure that you take advantage of this. Our return goes up around $1,750 by doing this. ($5,500 into retirement and it ends up costing us $3,750)

We are good at saving our money, so I shouldn't get a refund. I'm actually disappointed in myself for not pushing us to open a money market, high-interest savings acct, or a CD with the extra money in our checking acct. It earns us around $.18/month when it could be earning upwards of $20/mo.

In short, I have been okay giving the gov't an interest free loan, since it's obvious our gov't needs the money and I'm a moron and doesn't take advantage of my extra money... until now. :)
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
6,857
11,205
113
Yes the guy who literally works with the stock market thinks the average investor can make a 62% return yearly. Glad you could put those words in my mouth.

Again, I concede that you did not literally say those words, but you're either dense yourself or being willfully dishonest if you can't understand what your post implied. In response to someone who said the OP should do what works for him in regards to his taxes, you said don't do that, here's what I do, and here was my return - as if that were a thing that is achievable for most people.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: besserheimerphat

capitalcityguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
8,332
2,124
113
Des Moines
It's all personal preference. Don't let anyone tell you different.

I agree and disagree with this.

If you are an investor and use that money during the year to make investment vs sending to the gov't , you're ahead by not tying up that money and getting zero return on it. So from that standpoint, it does matter. The numbers prove that out.

That said, most people won't do that, so in the end for the majority of people, it probably is more personal preference.
 

Cyclone.TV

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2016
3,750
2,354
83
39
I agree and disagree with this.

If you are an investor and use that money during the year to make investment vs sending to the gov't , you're ahead by not tying up that money and getting zero return on it. So from that standpoint, it does matter. The numbers prove that out.

That said, most people won't do that, so in the end for the majority of people, it probably is more personal preference.

Yeah, and if I get a 2nd job I’ll have more money than if I don’t.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cyched

CloneFan4

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2010
5,882
5,593
113
West Des Moines
Again, I concede that you did not literally say those words, but you're either dense yourself or being willfully dishonest if you can't understand what your post implied. In response to someone who said the OP should do what works for him in regards to his taxes, you said don't do that, here's what I do, and here was my return - as if that were a thing that is achievable for most people.

Again, thanks for putting words in my mouth and using your telepathic powers to communicate what I was implying. You're a big help.
 

capitalcityguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
8,332
2,124
113
Des Moines
Yeah, and if I get a 2nd job I’ll have more money than if I don’t.

Do you disagree with my answer?

Your initial response was patently false, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt because like me, you realize most won't use the larger paycheck received during the year to work to their advantage....i..e...they'll just spend a little more sooner.

But there are those, albeit the minority, they would consider the advantage of not shipping excess tax payments to the government throughout the year only to receive it back without interest.

That was the question the OP was trying to understand.
 

Cyclone.TV

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2016
3,750
2,354
83
39
Do you disagree with my answer?

Your initial response was patently false, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt because like me, you realize most won't use the larger paycheck received during the year to work to their advantage....i..e...they'll just spend a little more sooner.

But there are those, albeit the minority, they would consider the advantage of not shipping excess tax payments to the government throughout the year only to receive it back without interest.

That was the question the OP was trying to understand.

Again, it’s personal choice. Just because you can make more money doesn’t make it the right thing to do - it’s a choice. Some like the money now, some like it later. Some invest, some spend. It’s all personal preference. It’s not patently false.
 

capitalcityguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
8,332
2,124
113
Des Moines
Again, it’s personal choice. Just because you can make more money doesn’t make it the right thing to do - it’s a choice. Some like the money now, some like it later. Some invest, some spend. It’s all personal preference. It’s not patently false.

Look at the OPs original comment . They took the time to start a thread to better understand this question. it is a valid one, despite what you originally implied. You said there was no difference, which is false.

For you to be correct, you'll need to argue that the "time value of money" isn't a real concept. It is, and I can give you a laundry list of links if you need them.

I dollar in your hand today is more valuable to you than one given to you in 6 months.
 

3TrueFans

Just a Happily Married Man
Sep 10, 2009
59,148
52,917
113
44
Ames
Look at the OPs original comment . They took the time to start a thread to better understand this question. it is a valid one, despite what you originally implied. You said there was no difference, which is false.

For you to be correct, you'll need to argue that the "time value of money" isn't a real concept. It is, and I can give you a laundry list of links if you need them.

I dollar in your hand today is more valuable to you than one given to you in 6 months.
He didn't say there was no difference.
 

SoapyCy

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2012
20,023
9,760
113
grundy center
I'm pretty financially astute. I over-analyze a lot and enjoy discussing personal finance. But here's the deal... I *still* like getting a refund. We save for retirement, college, cash savings, pay extra on our mortgage, etc. So we are responsible and getting $1,000 back (or whatever) at once is a nice little bonus. We got a lot back this year and I put half of it into 529 plans and the other half into a future residing project on the house. Next year we'll owe and I'll dip into savings to pay for it. Getting a small chunk of cash at once is a good feeling. It may not be the absolute best penny-pinching thing to do but if it's not harmful that why not enjoy that feeling?
 

capitalcityguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
8,332
2,124
113
Des Moines
He didn't say there was no difference.

touche

But in reality there are consequences and his reply suggested there were none. The OP was trying to understand the overall argument for and against. Yes, it is personal preference (i.e...no one forces you one way or another), but that doesn't answer the question as to why you'd do one vs the other.
 

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
7,345
11,664
113
Augusta National Golf Club
Time value of money says a dollar today is worth more than a dollar next spring. Refunds are not "bonus income" checks that the financially illiterate claim them to be. The IRS withheld more of YOUR money at a 0% interest rate.

However, there are sooo many people in this country that can't save a couple hundred dollars for a rainy day fund. So I get why a refund amount makes them upset. It's easier to complain about the IRS then to look into the mirror and tell yourself you need help with your money habits
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: isufbcurt

Cyclone.TV

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2016
3,750
2,354
83
39
touche

But in reality there are consequences and his reply suggested there were none. The OP was trying to understand the overall argument for and against. Yes, it is personal preference (i.e...no one forces you one way or another), but that doesn't answer the question as to why you'd do one vs the other.

Consequences?? You could invest and lose, you know.

The question as to why you’d one vs the other is the exact reason I say “personal preference”. For some, it could actually save them money because they don’t spend it during the year. Some could make a little. Some don’t care if they make money off of it. I could make more money if I wanted to by working more during the year, too. I choose not to. It’s a preference.