Blowout loss to Baylor, Rhoads fired?

A mid-season firing for losses alone (without a circus of player walk outs, some kind of character scandal, etc) is probably a bad idea for a school like ISU as it sends a message of impatience in a place where a new coach is going to need patience. Wait til the end of the season, and let him go.
This is what happens when you get your head kicked in for 3 straight years.
 
The more I think about it, the more I think he will still be here next year. So we have that to look forward too.

Bret, I'm glad you were the one to post this, because there is only one appropriate reply:

giphy.gif


Seriously, I'm afraid he doesn't get fired also.
 
I heard Briles will call off the dogs and keep the game somewhat close because he doesn't want to upset his pal who runs a Cyclone message board
 
A mid-season firing for losses alone (without a circus of player walk outs, some kind of character scandal, etc) is probably a bad idea for a school like ISU as it sends a message of impatience in a place where a new coach is going to need patience. Wait til the end of the season, and let him go.

I get what you are saying, but I think "patience" isn't quite the right word. Although I'm drawing a blank on the right word. I think it's something closer to "respect".
 
One other thought: does anyone get on CF each day hoping there is some long shot news that he actually was fired? I know it's crossed my mind.
 
I understand the thought process here but anyone who takes more than a 2 second glance would see that Rhoads is in year 7 with 3 straight awful seasons to boot. There is patience here.

Yes. Impatience. If there is one thing that ISU is not, it's impatient with the football program as the fact that he is still coaching here this year attests.

Keeping him till the end of the season proves that ISU is fine with double digit loss seasons and that having one doesn't shorten the noose until the end of next year.

Well, history is not on our side, idk I could be wrong, but a lot of the donors think that Paul is a good guy, which he is, and thats all fine and dandy, but when that "nice guy" can't win a friggin football game, it's time to cut the strings. I just hope the donors are getting tired of the product on the field.

Also, what makes anyone think that JP would fire a coach, people remember the GMac situation? He was going to give him another year. Thank you again, Oregon for taking Altman.

I get all these points and agree that we've been patient, and agree that maybe it should have happened at the end of last year, but I think it sends a much better signal to future coaches if you make the move in the offseason.
 
FWIW, I heard that if we somehow managed to lose to KU, Rhoads would have been fired after the game. Since that didn't happen, if he is to be fired, it won't be until after the last game.

I heard that too. It was my brother who told me. My brother has nothing to do with ISU.
 


You act like this is completely Pollard's decision. Its not. Leath and Donors will force JP to get rid of CPR.

There were quite a few people willing to give him another year with what we brought back last year, esp. on D. However, there is no excuse for this year. Support is gone, and a change will be forced.

Where did I say anything about Pollard?

The way he is coaching, just doesn't look like a coach who's concerned about his job. I'm the opposite of a Pollard hater, so my post had nothing to do with that.
 
I get what you are saying, but I think "patience" isn't quite the right word. Although I'm drawing a blank on the right word. I think it's something closer to "respect".

I think that "professional courtesy" might be what you're looking for.
 
Where did I say anything about Pollard?

The way he is coaching, just doesn't look like a coach who's concerned about his job. I'm the opposite of a Pollard hater, so my post had nothing to do with that.

I'd kinda agree with you here, but that could also mean he's already been told that he's going to be out at the end of the year.
 
A mid-season firing for losses alone (without a circus of player walk outs, some kind of character scandal, etc) is probably a bad idea for a school like ISU as it sends a message of impatience in a place where a new coach is going to need patience. Wait til the end of the season, and let him go.

For some, the patience ran out in nashville.
 
I get all these points and agree that we've been patient, and agree that maybe it should have happened at the end of last year, but I think it sends a much better signal to future coaches if you make the move in the offseason.

If I was the new coach, I would ask for a fair ten year contract with a nice buyout as it is a coaching graveyard.